Changeflow GovPing Banking & Finance UK Pensions Regulatory Updates: TPR Virgin Medi...
Priority review Guidance Added Final

UK Pensions Regulatory Updates: TPR Virgin Media Remedy Guidance, Master Trust Reserving, Beckmann Rights

Favicon for www.jdsupra.com JD Supra Finance & Banking
Published April 2nd, 2026
Detected April 3rd, 2026
Email

Summary

The Pensions Regulator published guidance addressing historic invalid scheme amendments following the Virgin Media decision, providing practical steps for remediation under prospective Pension Schemes Bill provisions. TPR also updated master trust reserving guidance with revised thresholds and a scheme-specific approach, and a new court judgment clarified Beckmann rights limitation periods as a single six-year breach at point of redundancy rather than ongoing with each payment.

What changed

TPR issued guidance on remedying potentially invalid historic alterations following the Virgin Media decision. The guidance enables schemes to either search for actuarial evidence or utilize forthcoming PSB provisions involving retrospective actuarial confirmation. Key requirements include: schemes must weigh cost-benefit of evidence searches versus PSB remediation; formal written actuarial instructions specifying alterations; realistic scheme-specific timetables; TPR does not expect exhaustive searches. Importantly, TPR confirms schemes need not report actions to the regulator, and any historic breach is "very unlikely to be materially significant" where remedied under PSB provisions. Master trust reserving guidance was also updated with revised thresholds adopting a more scheme-specific approach to free capital for productive use. A new judgment clarified Beckmann rights limitation: a one-off breach occurs at redundancy (not with each pension payment), subject to a six-year contractual limitation period.

Schemes with potentially invalid historic amendments should evaluate remediation options, engage actuaries early to determine available information, and maintain clear audit trails. TPR signals upcoming guidance on DB scheme surplus release, barriers to private market and UK infrastructure investment, and an AI action plan. Scheme trustees and administrators should review Beckmann rights claims for limitation considerations and ensure document retention policies preserve records pending resolution. No mandatory reporting to TPR is required for schemes pursuing PSB remediation.

What to do next

  1. Assess schemes for potentially invalid historic amendments and evaluate cost-benefit of evidence search versus PSB remediation pathway
  2. Issue formal written instructions to actuaries specifying alterations to be considered under PSB provisions
  3. Review Beckmann rights claims for limitation period exposure under new judgment (six years from redundancy)

Source document (simplified)

April 2, 2026

UK Pensions: What’s new this week? March 2026 #5

Neil Bowden, Andy Cork, Jane Higgins, Jessica Kerslake, Helen Powell, Angela Stafford A&O Shearman + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed

Welcome to your weekly update from the A&O Shearman Pensions team, covering all the latest legal and regulatory developments in the world of workplace pensions.

Summary

  • TPR guidance on Virgin Media remedy, with practical steps for schemes on remedying potentially invalid historic alterations.
  • Master trust reserving guidance has been updated, with TPR adopting a more scheme-specific approach and changing thresholds to free up capital for productive use and better member outcomes.
  • Upcoming TPR guidance: expect publications on releasing DB scheme surplus, barriers to private market and UK infrastructure investment, and an AI action plan.
  • A new judgment clarifies limitation for claiming Beckmann rights, finding there is a one-off breach at redundancy (not with each pension payment), and a six-year contractual limitation period.
  • Plus: PASA trustee-administrator relationship guidance; dashboards testing and updated draft standards; and HMRC’s latest pension schemes newsletter.

TPR guidance on Virgin Media remedy

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has published guidance for schemes with potentially invalid historic alterations following the Virgin Media decision. The Pension Schemes Bill (PSB) includes a remedy to help deal with these issues, involving retrospective actuarial confirmation. The guidance sets out a range of practical points, including:

  • Schemes should weigh up the cost and benefit of searching for evidence of a historic actuarial confirmation versus moving directly to remediation under the PSB provisions.
  • To use the PSB provisions, schemes will need to provide a formal written instruction to their actuary specifying the alterations to be considered; agree a practical and realistic timetable according to the scheme's circumstances and discuss timing with the sponsoring employer.
  • Schemes should speak to actuaries at the outset about whether they have sufficient information already available to form an opinion. TPR does not expect exhaustive searches to be undertaken. If additional information is required, work with administrators and employers to identify what is readily available.
  • Maintain a clear audit trail for all decisions, actions and results; keep the sponsoring employer informed and consider the extent to which any findings on validity may affect the scheme's funding position. Ensure document retention policies will not cause records to be destroyed before the matter is resolved.
  • Schemes do not need to report their actions to TPR: if and to the extent an invalid amendment can be remedied, any historic breach is “very unlikely to be materially significant” to TPR now. Read the guidance.

Updated master trust reserving guidance

TPR has updated its guidance around regulatory capital reserving requirements for master trusts, as part of its objective to “strip back unnecessary regulatory burden so that schemes can free up capital for productive use and focus on delivering the best possible outcomes for members”. The updates allow for a more scheme-specific approach and changes thresholds, including lower minimum liquidity levels in certain circumstances and greater allowance for revenue offsetting. TPR will publish annual data on reserving practices from next year.

Read the guidance and blog post discussing the updates.

Upcoming TPR guidance

In a recent speech discussing innovation in the pensions market, TPR’s chief executive gave some updates on upcoming developments: TPR will publish guidance in early May on the factors that trustees of DB schemes should consider when releasing surplus; it will publish a report later this spring on its engagement with industry on understanding the barriers and appetite for private market investments, including UK-based infrastructure; and it expects to publish an AI action plan in May, with annual progress updates.

Read the speech.

County Court ruling on limitation period issues in Beckmann rights claim

A new County Court decision considers the correct limitation period for a claim for failure to provide “ Beckmann rights” following a transfer under TUPE (the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006): Mendes v. Slater and Gordon. Broadly, TUPE protects an employee’s rights when a business is transferred to a new employer but contains an exemption under which rights under occupational pension schemes are carved out from the transfer, such that the new employer does not have to provide those rights. The exception is that any enhanced early retirement or redundancy rights (“ Beckmann rights”) do transfer to the new employer.

In this case, Dr Mendes had enhanced early retirement redundancy rights and was transferred to a new employer under TUPE in 2012. He was made redundant in 2017 but did not receive redundancy payments reflecting his Beckmann rights in relation to pre-2012 service and sought advice from solicitors on this. The solicitors failed to issue proceedings and admitted this was a breach of their duties. The question for consideration, as a preliminary matter, was whether Dr Mendes had lost his underlying right to claim for these Beckmann rights due to limitation (the legal time limit on bringing claims).

To determine when the limitation period began, His Honour Judge Monty KC first considered whether a fresh cause of action accrues for each incorrect monthly pension payment, or if there was a one-off breach upon redundancy. He considered multiple cases in which pension payments have given rise to a claim on an instalment-by-instalment basis. However, in this case the obligation was on the employer to ensure that Dr Mendes received regular payments reflecting his Beckmann rights. This was not a trustee obligation; the trustee had paid Dr Mendes in accordance with the rules of the scheme. On the day before redundancy, Dr Mendes was entitled to his Beckmann rights, and his employer was obliged to fund the pension scheme so that those rights would result in payment of the enhanced redundancy benefit. This claim was against the employer for damages in respect of its failure to do so, which was a one-off breach at the date of redundancy.

Limitation periods vary according to the type of claim, for example: a claim by a beneficiary under a trust to recover trust property—no limitation period; a claim upon a specialty (the deeds of the scheme)—a 12-year limitation period; or a simple contractual/tortious claim—a six-year limitation period. The judge held it was a contractual claim; it was a failure to provide Dr Mendes with his entitlement under his contract of employment when that right was triggered by redundancy. It was not a claim in respect of the loss of trust rights or for underpayment of benefits.

The case is not currently available through public sources; contact us if you would like more information.

PASA trustee-administrator lifecycle guidance: final instalment

The Pensions Administration Standards Association (PASA) has published the fourth and final part of its series of guidance on the trustee-administrator lifecycle. This instalment focuses on building and sustaining an effective trustee–administrator relationship following installation. It includes suggestions for a governance framework; effective oversight; and how to manage challenges and a breakdown in relationship. PASA will also be sharing a practical oversight tool to support discussions.

Read the guide.

Dashboards testing and revised reporting standards

The Pensions Dashboards Programme (PDP) has published an updated draft of its reporting standards as part of its consultation on changes to the standards, largely aimed at requiring daily, automated reporting of data. This updated draft version sets out the technical requirements for the routine submission of this data to MaPS. The consultation is open until April 30, 2026.

The PDP has also announced that the second phase of consumer testing for the MoneyHelper pensions dashboard is now underway. It has published a blog post outlining what this new phase involves and how results will be shared. It encourages schemes to invite members to take part and includes a toolkit to help communicate about this.

Read the updated standards and the blog post.

HMRC: latest pensions schemes newsletter

HMRC has published its latest pension schemes newsletter (no. 179). The newsletter includes information on changes to the way some UK pension payments to people living in Luxembourg are taxed; a reminder that from April 6, 2026, all pension scheme administrators of a UK registered pension scheme will need to be UK resident; and updates on the lifetime allowance protection look-up service and other matters.

Read the newsletter.

[View source.]

Send Print Report

Related Posts

Latest Posts

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

©
A&O Shearman

Written by:

A&O Shearman Contact + Follow Neil Bowden + Follow Andy Cork + Follow Jane Higgins + Follow Jessica Kerslake + Follow Helen Powell + Follow Angela Stafford + Follow more less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • ✔ Increased readership
  • ✔ Actionable analytics
  • ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Published In:

Defined Benefit Plans + Follow Employee Benefits + Follow HMRC + Follow International Labor Laws + Follow New Guidance + Follow Pensions + Follow Plan Administrators + Follow Regulatory Oversight + Follow Reporting Requirements + Follow Retirement Plan + Follow The Pensions Regulator (TPR) + Follow UK + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow Labor & Employment + Follow Tax + Follow more less

A&O Shearman on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide

Named provisions

Virgin Media Decision Remedy PSB Remediation Provisions Master Trust Regulatory Capital Requirements Beckmann Rights Limitation

Classification

Agency
TPR
Published
April 2nd, 2026
Instrument
Guidance
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive

Who this affects

Applies to
Employers Insurers Legal professionals
Industry sector
5239 Asset Management 5241 Insurance
Activity scope
Pension Scheme Administration DB Scheme Management Master Trust Oversight
Geographic scope
United Kingdom GB

Taxonomy

Primary area
Pensions & Retirement
Operational domain
Compliance
Topics
Financial Services Employment & Labor

Get Banking & Finance alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when JD Supra Finance & Banking publishes new changes.

Optional. Personalizes your daily digest.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.