OH-COURTS

Mesenbrick v. Hartley - Appeal Dismissed

The Ohio Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal and cross-appeal in Mesenbrick v. Hartley. The court found that the trial court's dismissal without prejudice was not a final appealable order, rendering any potential errors harmless as the claims could be refiled.

H.A. v. J.A. - Ohio Court of Appeals Domestic Violence Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a domestic violence civil protection order (DVCPO) against the appellant. The court found sufficient evidence that the appellee feared imminent serious physical harm, upholding the trial court's decision to grant the DVCPO despite a magistrate's recommendation against it.

Ohio Court of Appeals rules on unlawful detention during traffic stop

The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's decision to suppress evidence, ruling that a defendant fleeing from a traffic stop did not prolong the detention unlawfully. The court found the stop was terminated by the defendant's actions before any unlawful extension could occur.

State v. Jones - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's conviction of Kiante Jones for obstructing official business. The court found no irreconcilable conflict between the obstructing official business statute and the resisting arrest statute, upholding the State's discretion in charging decisions.

State v. Halderman - Sex Offender Designation Error

The Ohio Court of Appeals vacated its prior judgment and reversed in part the trial court's decision in State v. Halderman. The court found that the trial court erred in designating the appellant a sex offender for a misdemeanor conviction that did not qualify as a sexually oriented offense. The case is remanded for vacation of the sex offender designation.

Goldshtein v. Cuyahoga Cty. Fiscal Officer - Abuse of Discretion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision, finding no abuse of discretion in upholding the Cuyahoga County Board of Revision's assessment of property value. The appellant failed to establish sufficient evidence that the board's decision was in error.

State ex rel. Fought v. Industrial Commission of Ohio - Mandamus

The Ohio Court of Appeals denied a writ of mandamus sought by Jason B. Fought, upholding the Industrial Commission's denial of his permanent total disability compensation application. The court found sufficient evidence supported the commission's findings regarding vocational potential and consideration of psychological and physical conditions.

Kurtz v. Indus. Comm. - TTD Compensation Termination

The Ohio Court of Appeals ruled that while temporary total disability (TTD) compensation can terminate upon reaching maximum medical improvement (MMI), the Industrial Commission abused its discretion in ordering recoupment of overpayments. The court granted a limited writ of mandamus and remanded the case for further proceedings.

In re J.R.P. - Ohio Court of Appeals Opinion

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court's decision denying a father's motion to terminate shared parenting and reduce his parenting time. The court found the juvenile court did not err in reviewing best-interest factors and did not abuse its discretion.

In re G.M. - Court Denies Father's Motion to Modify Legal Custody

The Ohio Court of Appeals affirmed a juvenile court's denial of a father's motion to modify legal custody of his child. The court found no changed circumstances to warrant modification, citing evidence of abuse predating the prior decree and the father's ongoing criminal conduct.