Changeflow GovPing

What do you monitor?

Curated feeds for your role. Pick your area and get exactly the sources you need.

Recent changes

Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

GGH- GAL-0003 v. GGH- GAL-0003 - Civil Complaint

A new civil case, 3:26-cv-01779, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 2, 2026. The case involves a complaint for damages filed by GGH- GAL-0003 against GGH- GAL-0003.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

I.D. v. United States of America - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case, I.D. v. United States of America et al., was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a U.S. Government Defendant and is classified under Civil Rights: Other. The filing fee was $405.

Priority review Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Oscar v. HD Supply Management, LLC - Civil Rights Case

A new civil case, Oscar v. HD Supply Management, LLC, was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is classified under Civil Rights and falls under diversity jurisdiction. No summary of the case is currently available.

Routine Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Castillo Gomez v. Albarran - Habeas Corpus

A Habeas Corpus case, Castillo Gomez v. Albarran et al., was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing includes a petition for a writ of Habeas Corpus and a motion for a Temporary Restraining Order.

Routine Enforcement Immigration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Birkenseer v. Jaguar Land Rover - Contract Product Liability

A civil contract product liability case, Birkenseer v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was removed from Alameda Superior Court by Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC.

Routine Enforcement Product Safety
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

E.E v. United States, Federal Bureau of Prisons - Civil Case

A new civil case, E.E v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a U.S. Government Defendant and is categorized under 'Other' for the Nature of Suit. Recent filings include a proposed summons, an amended document, and a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Bezkorovayniy et al v. Edlow - Civil Immigration Case

A new civil immigration case, Bezkorovayniy et al v. Edlow, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was filed on March 2, 2026, with case number 5:26-cv-01798, and involves 'Other Immigration Actions'.

Routine Enforcement Immigration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Rubin et al v. County of Santa Clara California et al - Civil Rights

A new civil rights case, Rubin et al v. County of Santa Clara California et al, was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges violations related to civil rights and seeks damages against the County of Santa Clara and its departments.

Priority review Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

R.M. v. United States - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, R.M. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), was filed on March 2, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-01795. Initial filings include a complaint, proposed summons, a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

In Re Ishmael Jackson v. the State of Texas - Mandamus

The Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District, denied Ishmael Jackson's petition for writ of mandamus. The court found that the record provided was insufficient to establish the right to relief, citing deficiencies in meeting the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration

Showing 16021–16030 of 19,010 changes

1 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1901

Get alerts when regulations change

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.