What do you monitor?
Curated feeds for your role. Pick your area and get exactly the sources you need.
Compliance & Legal
Legal Research
Court opinions, regulatory guidance, and enforcement actions. AI-summarized.
Financial Compliance
SEC, OCC, FDIC, Fed, FINRA, CFPB, FASB, and state banking regulators. One feed.
Insurance Compliance
State commissioner bulletins, NAIC model laws, and DOI enforcement actions.
Environmental Compliance
EPA enforcement, state environmental agencies, PFAS regulatory updates.
Data Privacy
State AG privacy enforcement, FTC actions, CPPA rulemaking, and HIPAA enforcement.
Tax Compliance
IRS guidance changes and state tax department bulletins.
AML Compliance
FinCEN, OCC, FDIC, Fed, FATF, and banking regulator enforcement.
Labor & Employment
NLRB decisions, EEOC guidance, DOL wage updates, and 50-state labor law changes.
Immigration Law
USCIS policy changes, visa bulletin updates, CBP processing changes.
Industry
Pharma & Life Sciences
FDA warning letters, drug approvals, ICH guidelines, EMA updates, and DEA scheduling.
Energy & Utilities
FERC orders, state PUC decisions, and energy regulatory changes.
Cybersecurity
CISA KEV catalog, ICS-CERT, NSA advisories, NIST CSF, and FedRAMP updates.
Healthcare Compliance
CMS transmittals, OIG work plan, HIPAA enforcement, and Medicaid updates.
Trade & Procurement
Recent changes
California Highway Patrol v. Diaz - Employment Dispute
The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision to reduce a California Highway Patrol officer's termination to a one-year suspension for falsely claiming overtime. The court found the State Personnel Board did not abuse its discretion in modifying the penalty.
People v. Candler - California Court of Appeal Opinion
The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's denial of Mark Anthony Candler's petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. The court found Candler ineligible for relief as a matter of law, upholding his conviction for attempted murder and associated enhancements.
People v. Lopez - Resentencing Petition Denial
The California Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of a petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. The court found the defendant ineligible for resentencing as a matter of law based on the record of conviction.
In re M.D. - Juvenile Court Law Appeal
The California Court of Appeal filed an opinion in the case of In re M.D., concerning a juvenile wardship based on forcible oral copulation. The appellant argued insufficient evidence and a potential defense, but the court affirmed the lower court's order. This non-precedential opinion addresses juvenile justice and criminal law.
People v. Godoy - Criminal Sentencing Appeal
The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's decision not to recall and resentence Augustine Brady Godoy. The court reviewed the case under People v. Delgadillo and found no arguable issues, upholding the original sentence for second-degree murder.
People v. Vessels - Criminal Appeal
The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, filed an opinion in the case of People v. Vessels. The court affirmed the judgment of the Butte County Superior Court, upholding the defendant's conviction and sentence for assault with a deadly weapon and battery on a peace officer.
People v. Martinez - Criminal Appeal
The California Court of Appeal modified a judgment in the case of People v. Martinez. The court struck a parole revocation restitution fine and corrected fee assessments, while otherwise affirming the conviction for murder and burglary with enhancements.
Brown v. Hall CA3 - Non-Precedential Opinion Affirming Trial Court
The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, filed a non-precedential opinion in Brown v. Hall, affirming trial court decisions. The court found the appellant's briefs deficient and rejected pleas for relief, citing non-compliance with court rules.
Piltan v. Novell - Appeal Dismissed
The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, filed an opinion in Piltan v. Novell on March 2, 2026. The court dismissed the appeal as premature due to a pending cross-complaint, citing California Rules of Court.
Rahman v. Ayoubi - Appeal of Anti-SLAPP Motion Denial
The California Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of an anti-SLAPP motion in Rahman v. Ayoubi. The court found sufficient evidence that the respondent had a probability of prevailing on the merits of his claim, despite a potential misapplication of a legal rule by the trial court. The case involves an appeal from an order denying a special motion to strike.
Browse by category
US Federal
963 sources
US State
116 sources
US Courts
122 sources
UK
77 sources
EU
57 sources
Canada
27 sources
Courts & Legal
309 sources
Government & Legislation
257 sources
Banking & Finance
222 sources
Trade & Sanctions
124 sources
Healthcare
119 sources
Labor & Employment
110 sources
Energy
98 sources
Environment
83 sources
Pharma & Drug Safety
81 sources
Securities & Markets
74 sources
Tax
62 sources
Data Privacy & Cybersecurity
61 sources
Agriculture & Food Safety
61 sources
Transportation
56 sources
Insurance
55 sources
Defense & National Security
48 sources
Consumer Protection
39 sources
Telecom & Technology
34 sources
Education
20 sources
Housing
15 sources
Immigration
9 sources
Browse by agency
ESMA
3 sources
TX Courts
3 sources
HRSA
3 sources
NY Courts
3 sources
OR Courts
3 sources
VA
3 sources
Health Canada
3 sources
VA Courts
3 sources
STB
3 sources
PBGC
3 sources
EU Council
3 sources
Fiscal Service
3 sources
SFO
3 sources
EBSA
3 sources
State BOA
3 sources
HHS OIG
3 sources
SFC Hong Kong
3 sources
AL Courts
3 sources
ASIC
3 sources
NSF
3 sources
Get alerts when regulations change
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.