People v. Blake - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Two, filed an opinion on March 5, 2026, in the case of People v. Blake. The court affirmed the trial court's order denying the defendant's petition for resentencing under section 1172.6, finding the evidence sufficient to support the conclusion that the defendant was the actual killer.

People v. Alvaro - Non-Precedential Opinion

The California Court of Appeal filed a non-precedential opinion in the case of People v. Alvaro. The defendant was found guilty of 10 counts arising from sexual offenses against two minors. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, finding no reversible error.

People v. Nelson - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's denial of mental health diversion for Ryan Anthony Nelson, who was sentenced to 12 years for burglary and auto theft. The court found Nelson's mental health disorders were not significant factors in his crimes and that he was unsuitable for diversion.

People v. Uceda - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal filed an opinion in People v. Uceda, concerning a conviction for murder and shooting from a vehicle. The court reversed one conviction due to instructional error, allowing the prosecution to retry the charge or proceed with a lesser included offense.

People v. Tindall - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment against Christopher John Tindall, who was convicted of maintaining a place for unlawful cannabis sales and possession of cannabis for sale. Tindall appealed, arguing the trial court erred by preventing a religious exemption defense and by judicial misconduct. The appellate court disagreed with his contentions.

Las Posas Valley Water v. Ventura County Waterworks - Water Rights Adjudication

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's judgment in a comprehensive water rights adjudication for the Las Posas Valley Groundwater Basin. The ruling addresses the allocation of groundwater rights among various landowners and water suppliers, including a 'physical solution' and the appointment of a watermaster.

In re Meraz - Habeas Corpus

The California Court of Appeal issued an opinion in the case of In re Meraz, concerning a petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. The court addressed whether Proposition 57, which altered juvenile prosecution procedures, should have been applied retroactively to the petitioner's case, impacting his direct appeal and the effectiveness of counsel.

Marriage of Crabtree - Family Law Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, filed an opinion in the Marriage of Crabtree case on March 5, 2026. The case involves an appeal from an award of contractual attorney fees related to a contempt order for violating visitation orders. The court affirmed the trial court's award of attorney fees.

Moramarco v. Nowakoski - Appeal of Trustee's Civil Penalty

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's judgment against a trustee, Edward J. Nowakoski, in the case of Moramarco v. Nowakoski. The court ordered the judgment amended to clarify postjudgment interest accrual on prejudgment interest, affirming the civil penalty and attorney fees awarded to the beneficiaries.

In re G.M. - Juvenile Court Law Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a juvenile court's probation condition prohibiting the use, sale, or possession of non-prescribed medications. The appellant argued the condition was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, but the court found it valid.