Changeflow GovPing

What do you monitor?

Curated feeds for your role. Pick your area and get exactly the sources you need.

Recent changes

Favicon for www.mass.gov

State AGs Challenge Trump Administration Regulations on Contraception Coverage

Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell led a coalition of 22 state attorneys general in filing an amicus brief challenging Trump Administration regulations that expand religious and moral exemptions to no-cost contraception coverage. The brief urges the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to affirm a lower court ruling that the regulations are unlawful, citing potential shifts of $73.8 million in costs to individuals.

Priority review Enforcement Healthcare
Favicon for www.aepd.es

GDPR Resolution Fines Company 1,400 Euros for Unsolicited Email

The Spanish Data Protection Agency (AEPD) has issued a resolution fining JOMAFRAN 2013, S. L. 1,400 euros for violating data protection laws. The company sent unsolicited marketing emails referencing a judicial proceeding without prior consent or relationship with the recipient.

Priority review Enforcement Data Privacy
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Guardianship of F.W. - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, has reversed a lower court's denial of a guardianship petition for a minor, F.W. The appellate court found the trial court applied the incorrect legal standard and misunderstood relevant case law, remanding the case for further proceedings.

Priority review Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Ryan v. Salinas Union High School District - Appeal of Order Denying Motion to Vacate Judgment

The California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, filed a non-precedential opinion on March 4, 2026, in Ryan v. Salinas Union High School District. The court dismissed the appeal of an order denying a motion to vacate a judgment, finding the order was not appealable.

Routine Enforcement Education
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

People v. Law - Felony Murder Law Resentencing

The California Court of Appeal reversed a trial court's denial of a resentencing petition filed under Penal Code section 1172.6, concerning changes to felony murder laws. The appellate court found the trial court erred in its definition of reckless indifference, requiring a remand for further proceedings.

Priority review Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

People v. Ramirez - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Seven, affirmed a judgment against Carlos Jose Ramirez. Ramirez appealed after pleading no contest and being sentenced to two years for being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court found no arguable issues on appeal.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

People v. Stortz - Criminal Conviction Appeal

The California Court of Appeal filed a non-precedential opinion in People v. Stortz, addressing a criminal defendant's appeal of a kidnapping conviction. The court affirmed the conviction, finding that any error in denying the defendant's request to represent himself at the preliminary hearing stage was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

People v. Williams - Criminal Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, filed a non-precedential opinion in People v. Williams. The court affirmed the lower court's denial of the defendant's petition for recall and resentencing, despite the People conceding error in the initial denial. The case concerns sentencing for a defendant convicted of multiple violent felonies.

Priority review Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Piltan v. Novell - Modification of Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, issued a modification to its non-precedential opinion in Piltan v. Novell. The modification corrects the listed counsel for the appellant, with no change to the judgment itself. The original opinion was filed on March 2, 2026, and the modification was filed on March 4, 2026.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Aquat 009 v. Fine CA2/7 - Non-Precedential Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Seven, filed a non-precedential opinion in Aquat 009, LLC v. Fine et al. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case concerning a defaulted loan and subsequent foreclosure. The opinion is not to be published in the official reports.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration

Showing 13731–13740 of 17,288 changes

1 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1729

Get alerts when regulations change

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.