Changeflow GovPing

What do you monitor?

Curated feeds for your role. Pick your area and get exactly the sources you need.

Recent changes

Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

C. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, C. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al., involves a complaint filed by Y. C. against the Federal Bureau of Prisons and other defendants.

Routine Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

A. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) - Civil Rights Case

A civil rights case has been filed against the US Bureau of Prisons. The case, identified as 4:26-cv-02021, was filed on March 9, 2026, in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The nature of the suit is listed as 'Civil Rights: Other'.

Routine Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Buntjer v. Adobe, Inc. - Civil Rights Jobs Case

A new civil rights case concerning employment has been filed against Adobe, Inc. and Talentburst, Inc. by Anna Buntjer. The case, filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges violations under federal question jurisdiction.

Routine Enforcement Employment & Labor
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Florez Perez et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services - Mandamus & Other

A civil case, Florez Perez et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al, was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint for injunctive relief and a petition for a writ of mandamus.

Priority review Enforcement Immigration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

D.L. v. United States - Civil Rights Case

A new civil rights case, D.L. v. United States of America et al, was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves the U.S. Government as a defendant and is categorized under Civil Rights: Other.

Routine Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Kapil v. Levi Strauss & Co. - Civil Rights Job Discrimination

A civil rights job discrimination case titled Kapil v. Levi Strauss & Co. has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint alleges discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination, with a jury trial demanded.

Priority review Enforcement Employment & Labor
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Sumisaki v. SSA Commissioner - Social Security Case

Grace Sumisaki filed a civil complaint against the SSA Commissioner in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 4:26-cv-02027, was filed on March 9, 2026, with a filing fee of $405.

Routine Enforcement Pensions & Retirement
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Henderson v. Lyft, Inc. et al - Civil Case

A new civil case, Henderson v. Lyft, Inc. et al, was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-01939-RFL, and it falls under the category of Diversity jurisdiction with a Nature of Suit for Personal Injury: Other.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.tncourts.gov

Tino Cartez Sutton v. State of Tennessee - Appeal Dismissed for Late Filing

The Tennessee Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal filed by Tino Cartez Sutton due to a late filing of the notice of appeal. The appellant failed to file within the mandatory 30-day period required by Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a).

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.tncourts.gov

Father's Appeal Dismissed for Failing to Comply with Briefing Rules

The Tennessee Court of Appeals dismissed a father's appeal because his brief failed to comply with appellate procedure rules. The court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the father's petition for parenting time. This decision highlights the importance of adhering to procedural rules in appeals.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration

Showing 13271–13280 of 18,654 changes

1 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1866

Get alerts when regulations change

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.