Supreme Court: Substantial-Evidence Standard for Asylum Persecution Determinations

The Supreme Court ruled that courts of appeals must apply the substantial-evidence standard when reviewing the Board of Immigration Appeals' determination of whether undisputed facts constitute 'persecution' under the Immigration and Nationality Act. This decision clarifies the standard of review for asylum cases.

County of Lancaster, PA v. AFSCME District Council 89 - Labor Arbitration

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued an opinion in County of Lancaster, PA v. AFSCME District Council 89, addressing whether a labor arbitration panel had jurisdiction to issue an award concerning impact bargaining due to unforeseen circumstances. The court reviewed the trial court's order denying the union's petition to vacate the arbitration award.

Protect PT & P.R. Wendell v. Twp. of Penn - Land Development Approval

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania affirmed a lower court's decision upholding the approval of a revised land development application for an unconventional natural gas well pad. The court found that the Penn Township Board of Commissioners and the Court of Common Pleas correctly granted preliminary and final approval for EQT Artemis Production, LLC's project.

EU Official Journal L Series Daily View

The EU Official Journal L series for March 4, 2026, has been published, featuring various legislative and non-legislative acts. Key items include updates to monetary agreements with Monaco and Andorra, a definitive countervailing duty on biodiesel imports from Indonesia, and amendments to regulations concerning automated driving systems.

Pearson v. Pearson - Child Custody Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania reviewed a child custody order, finding that certain provisions modifying custody upon completion of requirements without a best interest determination violated the Child Custody Act. The court affirmed in part and vacated in part the lower court's order.

Com. v. Adams Diaz, S. - Non-Precedential Decision

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential decision in the case of Commonwealth v. Adams Diaz, S. The court affirmed the trial court's judgment of sentence after the appellant was convicted of theft by failing to make required disposition of funds. The decision addresses the denial of the appellant's motions to dismiss and for a mistrial.

Com. v. Baltimore, M., Jr. - Criminal Sentencing Appeal

The Superior Court of Pennsylvania issued a non-precedential opinion affirming the judgment of sentence for Michael Baltimore Jr. following the revocation of his probation. The appeal concerned the discretionary aspects of his sentencing.

Com. v. Carlton - Appeal of Firearm Statute Constitutionality

The Pennsylvania Superior Court issued a non-precedential decision in Commonwealth v. Carlton, addressing the constitutionality of firearm carrying statutes. The appellant challenged the prohibition on individuals aged 18-20 obtaining a license to carry a firearm. The court affirmed the judgment of sentence.

USITC Institutes Section 337 Investigation of Laptops, Routers, Gateways

The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has instituted a Section 337 investigation into alleged patent infringement by certain laptops, routers, gateways, and components imported into the U.S. The investigation names ASUSTeK Computer Inc., ASUS Computer International, Inc., TP-Link Systems Inc., D-Link Corporation, D-Link Systems, Inc., and Ubiquiti Inc. as respondents.

USITC Affirms Wind Tower Trade Cases from Four Countries

The USITC has affirmed existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on utility scale wind towers from Canada, Indonesia, South Korea, and Vietnam. This decision means the current trade remedy orders will remain in place, continuing to affect imports of these products into the United States.