Chicago Headline Club v. Kristi Noem - Court Opinion

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a preliminary injunction against federal immigration enforcement activities in Chicago. The court dismissed the appeal as moot after the plaintiffs voluntarily sought dismissal of their case due to the cessation of the enforcement operation.

Chicago Headline Club v. Kristi Noem - Civil Rights

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals vacated a district court's preliminary injunction that regulated federal immigration enforcement in Chicago. The court dismissed the appeal after the plaintiffs voluntarily sought to dismiss their case, citing the end of 'Operation Midway Blitz'. This action removes the prior injunction against federal immigration authorities.

Campbell v. Bisignano - Social Security Civil Case

A new civil case, Campbell v. Bisignano, was filed on March 5, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves Social Security benefits and is classified under Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV. The filing includes a complaint and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Cohen v Hakim: Admar International ownership dispute memorandum opinion

The US District Court for the District of Delaware issued a memorandum opinion in Cohen v. Hakim, concerning an ownership dispute over Admar International, Inc. The court denied a motion to remand the case to state court, allowing the federal litigation to proceed.

West River Fish Consumption Advisory

The Connecticut Department of Public Health has issued an advisory regarding fish consumption from the West River due to a fuel oil spill. Residents are urged to avoid eating fish caught in the affected area until further notice.

ICO Decision: Council incorrectly withheld FOI information

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has ruled that Rhondda Cynon Taf County Borough Council incorrectly withheld information under FOI and EIR exemptions. The council must now reconsider the complainant's requests within 30 days.

ICO Decision: Council correct to withhold park expenditure information

The UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) issued a decision finding Ards and North Down Borough Council was correct to withhold certain park expenditure information under commercial confidentiality exemptions. The ICO does not require the council to take further action.

ICO Decision on DBT Information Disclosure

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) issued a decision regarding the Department for Business and Trade's (DBT) handling of an information request. While DBT was largely correct in withholding information, the ICO found breaches related to exceeding response times.

ICO Decision on East Hampshire Council FOIA Complaint

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) issued a decision regarding a complaint against East Hampshire Council concerning a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. The ICO found the council was justified in withholding some information but had breached FOIA regulations in its initial handling of the request. No further steps are required from the council.

ICO Decision: Home Office Correct to Deny FOI Request

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has ruled that the Home Office was correct to deny an FOI request concerning Kemi Badenoch by neither confirming nor denying holding the information, citing personal data exemptions. The decision upholds the Home Office's use of Section 40(5B) of the FOIA.