What do you monitor?
Curated feeds for your role. Pick your area and get exactly the sources you need.
Compliance & Legal
Legal Research
Court opinions, regulatory guidance, and enforcement actions. AI-summarized.
Financial Compliance
SEC, OCC, FDIC, Fed, FINRA, CFPB, FASB, and state banking regulators. One feed.
Insurance Compliance
State commissioner bulletins, NAIC model laws, and DOI enforcement actions.
Environmental Compliance
EPA enforcement, state environmental agencies, PFAS regulatory updates.
Data Privacy
State AG privacy enforcement, FTC actions, CPPA rulemaking, and HIPAA enforcement.
Tax Compliance
IRS guidance changes and state tax department bulletins.
AML Compliance
FinCEN, OCC, FDIC, Fed, FATF, and banking regulator enforcement.
Labor & Employment
NLRB decisions, EEOC guidance, DOL wage updates, and 50-state labor law changes.
Immigration Law
USCIS policy changes, visa bulletin updates, CBP processing changes.
Industry
Pharma & Life Sciences
FDA warning letters, drug approvals, ICH guidelines, EMA updates, and DEA scheduling.
Energy & Utilities
FERC orders, state PUC decisions, and energy regulatory changes.
Cybersecurity
CISA KEV catalog, ICS-CERT, NSA advisories, NIST CSF, and FedRAMP updates.
Healthcare Compliance
CMS transmittals, OIG work plan, HIPAA enforcement, and Medicaid updates.
Trade & Procurement
Recent changes
Gray Media v. Comanche County Facilities Authority - Open Records Act Appeal
The Supreme Court of Oklahoma is reviewing an appeal concerning whether a detention center managed by a public trust qualifies as a "law enforcement agency" under the Oklahoma Open Records Act. The case involves a media group's request for video footage.
In re Renteria - Habeas Corpus
The California Court of Appeal denied a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by Luis Renteria. Renteria argued his reincarceration for a parole violation violated cruel and unusual punishment clauses and that the Board of Parole Hearings failed to consider relevant factors. The court found both claims lacked merit.
Rahman v. Ayoubi - Appeal of Anti-SLAPP Motion Denial
The California Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of an anti-SLAPP motion in Rahman v. Ayoubi. The court found sufficient evidence that the respondent had a probability of prevailing on the merits of his claim, despite a potential misapplication of a legal rule by the trial court. The case involves an appeal from an order denying a special motion to strike.
Piltan v. Novell - Appeal Dismissed
The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, filed an opinion in Piltan v. Novell on March 2, 2026. The court dismissed the appeal as premature due to a pending cross-complaint, citing California Rules of Court.
Brown v. Hall CA3 - Non-Precedential Opinion Affirming Trial Court
The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, filed a non-precedential opinion in Brown v. Hall, affirming trial court decisions. The court found the appellant's briefs deficient and rejected pleas for relief, citing non-compliance with court rules.
People v. Martinez - Criminal Appeal
The California Court of Appeal modified a judgment in the case of People v. Martinez. The court struck a parole revocation restitution fine and corrected fee assessments, while otherwise affirming the conviction for murder and burglary with enhancements.
People v. Vessels - Criminal Appeal
The California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, filed an opinion in the case of People v. Vessels. The court affirmed the judgment of the Butte County Superior Court, upholding the defendant's conviction and sentence for assault with a deadly weapon and battery on a peace officer.
People v. Godoy - Criminal Sentencing Appeal
The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's decision not to recall and resentence Augustine Brady Godoy. The court reviewed the case under People v. Delgadillo and found no arguable issues, upholding the original sentence for second-degree murder.
In re M.D. - Juvenile Court Law Appeal
The California Court of Appeal filed an opinion in the case of In re M.D., concerning a juvenile wardship based on forcible oral copulation. The appellant argued insufficient evidence and a potential defense, but the court affirmed the lower court's order. This non-precedential opinion addresses juvenile justice and criminal law.
People v. Saucedo - Criminal Appeal on Fines
The California Court of Appeal filed an opinion in People v. Saucedo, concerning a criminal appeal. The court reversed and remanded the case solely for reconsideration of restitution and parole revocation fines, as the trial court imposed them without considering the defendant's ability to pay.
Browse by category
US Federal
932 sources
US State
116 sources
US Courts
122 sources
UK
61 sources
EU
53 sources
Canada
23 sources
Courts & Legal
247 sources
Government & Legislation
240 sources
Banking & Finance
211 sources
Trade & Sanctions
122 sources
Healthcare
116 sources
Labor & Employment
110 sources
Energy
101 sources
Environment
82 sources
Pharma & Drug Safety
77 sources
Securities & Markets
73 sources
Agriculture & Food Safety
61 sources
Data Privacy & Cybersecurity
59 sources
Insurance
56 sources
Transportation
56 sources
Tax
49 sources
Defense & National Security
48 sources
Consumer Protection
35 sources
Telecom & Technology
34 sources
Education
20 sources
Housing
15 sources
Immigration
8 sources
Energy & Utilities
1 sources
Browse by agency
HRSA
3 sources
NSF
3 sources
CBSA
3 sources
HHS OIG
3 sources
STB
3 sources
KS Courts
3 sources
SFO
3 sources
VA
3 sources
AMF France
3 sources
FFIEC
3 sources
AL Courts
3 sources
ESMA
3 sources
FEC
3 sources
NY Courts
3 sources
VA Courts
3 sources
EU Council
3 sources
ACPR
3 sources
DOC
3 sources
EIOPA
3 sources
NTSB
3 sources
Get alerts when regulations change
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.