Changeflow GovPing Trade & Sanctions US Steel and USW File Antidumping Petitions Tar...
Routine Notice Added Final

US Steel and USW File Antidumping Petitions Targeting Tin Mill Products from China, Taiwan, and Turkey

Favicon for www.jdsupra.com JD Supra Trade Law
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

Clark Hill LLP published an analysis of antidumping and countervailing duty petitions filed by US Steel Corporation and the United Steelworkers Union with the U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. International Trade Commission. The petitions seek AD duties on tin mill products from China, Taiwan, and Turkey, and CVD duties on imports from China. Petitioners alleged dumping margins of 202.02% to 1077.08% for China, 152.15% to 160.37% for Taiwan, and 190.95% to 192.91% for Turkey, with countervailing duties alleged above de minimis for China.

Published by Clark Hill PLC on jdsupra.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

What changed

US Steel Corporation and the United Steelworkers Union filed petitions with the U.S. Department of Commerce and U.S. International Trade Commission seeking antidumping duties on tin mill products from China, Taiwan, and Turkey, and countervailing duties on products from China. The petitions cover tin mill flat-rolled products coated or plated with tin, chromium, or chromium oxides, including tinplate and tin-free steel used in can manufacturing and food packaging. Petitioners alleged dumping margins ranging from 152.15% to 192.91% for Taiwan and Turkey, and 202.02% to 1077.08% for China, with countervailing duties alleged above de minimis for China.

U.S. importers and foreign exporters of tin mill products from the named countries should monitor these investigations closely, as preliminary duties may be imposed following DOC and ITC determinations. If AD/CVD orders are issued, importers could be required to post cash deposits at rates matching the alleged margins, significantly increasing the cost of affected imports. Foreign producers and exporters may face increased scrutiny and potential loss of U.S. market access.

What to do next

  1. Monitor for updates on DOC and ITC investigation status
  2. Contact international trade counsel for importer/exporter guidance

Archived snapshot

Apr 11, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

April 10, 2026

New U.S. Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions Target Tin Mill Products from China, Taiwan, and Turkey

Kelsey Christensen, Mark Ludwikowski, R. Kevin Williams Clark Hill PLC + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed

The Petitions

United States Steel Corporation and the United Steel, Paper, and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (collectively, “Petitioners”) have filed new petitions with the U.S. Department of Commerce (“DOC”) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) seeking the imposition of antidumping duties (“AD”) on imports into the United States of tin mill products from China, Taiwan, and Turkey and countervailing duties (“CVD”) on imports into the United States of tin mill  products from China. The Petitioners allege that imports of tin mill products are being dumped into the U.S. market from China, Taiwan, and Turkey, and that imports are being unfairly subsidized by the government of China. The Petitioners allege that these imports are injuring the domestic producers.

Scope of the Investigation

The following language describes the imported merchandise that the Petitioners intend to cover in these investigations:

The products within the scope of these investigations are tin mill flat-rolled products that are coated or plated with tin, chromium, or chromium oxides. Flat-rolled steel products coated with tin are known as tinplate. Flat-rolled steel products coated with chromium or chromium oxides are known as tin-free steel or electrolytic chromium-coated steel. The scope includes all the noted tin mill products regardless of thickness, width, form (in coils or cut sheets), coating type (electrolytic or otherwise), edge (trimmed, untrimmed or further processed, such as scroll cut), coating thickness, surface finish, temper, coating metal (tin, chromium, chromium oxide), reduction (single- or double-reduced), and whether or not coated with a plastic material.

The merchandise subject to these investigations is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), under HTSUS subheadings 7210.11.0000, 7210.12.0000, 7210.50.0020, 7210.50.0090, 7212.10.0000, 7212.50.0000, if of non-alloy steel and under HTSUS subheadings 7225.99.0090, and 7226.99.0180 if of alloy steel. Although the subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the investigations is dispositive.

The imported product subject to these petitions is tin mill products. Tinplate is used primarily to manufacture welded cans for food, aerosol, paint, filtration and general line applications. Chromium-coated steel sheet is used primarily for two-piece drawn cans and ends for food cans, as well as caps and closures for glass containers. Tinplate is used for the can itself because it imparts a shinier surface than chromium coating while chromium-coated steel sheet, with its duller surface finish, is considered adequate for use in the can ends.

Key Facts

Petitioners: **** United States Steel Corporation and the United Steel, Paper, and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union.

Foreign Producers/Exporters and U.S. Importers:  Please contact Clark Hill’s international trade team for a listing of individual importers and exporters named in the petitions.

AD/CVD margins: Petitioners alleged the following AD and CVD margins:

  • China: AD Margin from 202.02% to 1077.08% ad valorem, and a CVD margin above de minimis.
  • Taiwan: AD margin from 152.15% to 160.37%, ad valorem.
  • Turkey: AD margin from 190.95% to 192.91%, ad valorem.

The Investigations

The DOC and the ITC will conduct parallel investigations. The ITC will first determine if there is a reasonable indication of material injury or threat of injury to the U.S. industry. The DOC will then determine whether imports are being dumped or unfairly subsidized and will calculate corresponding AD and CVD duty margins that importers will need to pay on their entries.

If the DOC issues an affirmative preliminary determination, importers will be required to deposit the estimated AD/CVD duties on their imports as of the date that the DOC publishes its affirmative preliminary determination in the Federal Register. In this case, the DOC’s preliminary determinations are currently expected by July 3, 2026 (CVD) and September 16, 2026 (AD), although the schedule is subject to change. Importers should be aware that cash deposits may apply earlier if the DOC finds that there is a surge of imports after the petitions were filed.

Next Steps

Given the compressed statutory deadlines in U.S. AD/CVD proceedings, producers/exporters and relevant stakeholders may begin preparing immediately. As practical first steps, affected parties could:

  • Confirm whether their products fall within the proposed scope
  • Identify the legal entities involved in production, export, and sale to the United States
  • Preserve and organize detailed information concerning U.S. and home market (or third-country) sales, including pricing and terms of sale (AD)
  • Preserve and organize information concerning sales, production, ownership, financing, tax treatment, utility usage, and government support programs (CVD)
  • Prepare for possible DOC questionnaires and follow-up requests shortly after initiation
  • Coordinate across accounting, sales, and production teams (AD) or government authorities (CVD) to ensure that factual positions are presented consistently and accurately. If this product is of interest to your business, please contact Clark Hill’s international trade for additional details and strategic guidance information.

A schedule of approximate key dates is below.

Approximate Key Dates

| | | |
| Antidumping Duty Investigation | | |
| Event | No. of Days | Date of Action |
| Petition Filed | 0 | 4/9/2026 |
| DOC Initiation Date | 20 | 4/29/2026 |
| DOC Separate Rate Applications | 41 | 5/20/2026 |
| DOC Q&V Questionnaires | 44 | 5/23/2026 |
| ITC Preliminary Determination | 45 | 5/25/2026 |
| DOC Preliminary AD Determination | 160 | 9/16/2026 |
| DOC Final AD Determination | 235 | 11/30/2026 |
| ITC Final AD Determination | 280 | 1/14/2027 |
| DOC AD Publication of Order | 287 | 1/21/2027 |
| Countervailing Duty Investigation | | |
| Event | No. of Days | Date of Action |
| Petition Filed | 0 | 4/9/2026 |
| DOC Initiation Date | 20 | 4/29/2026 |
| DOC Q&V Questionnaires | 44 | 5/23/2026 |
| ITC Preliminary Determination | 45 | 5/25/2026 |
| DOC Preliminary CVD Determination | 85 | 7/3/2026 |
| Request for a DOC Hearing | 122 | 8/10/2026 |
| DOC Final CVD Determination | 160 | 9/16/2026 |
| ITC Final CVD Determination | 205 | 11/2/2026 |
| DOC CVD Publication of Order | 212 | 11/9/2026 |
* All deadlines are approximate and are subject to change throughout the course of an investigation. Deadlines that fall on a weekend or Federal holiday are extended to the next business day, as shown above.

Send Print Report

Related Posts

Latest Posts

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

©
Clark Hill PLC

Written by:

Clark Hill PLC Contact + Follow Kelsey Christensen + Follow Mark Ludwikowski + Follow R. Kevin Williams + Follow more less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • ✔ Increased readership
  • ✔ Actionable analytics
  • ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Published In:

Anti-Dumping Duty + Follow Antitrust Investigations + Follow China + Follow Countervailing Duties + Follow Imports + Follow International Trade + Follow International Trade Commission (ITC) + Follow Taiwan + Follow Tariffs + Follow Trade Associations + Follow Turkey + Follow U.S. Commerce Department + Follow Antitrust & Trade Regulation + Follow International Trade + Follow more less

Clark Hill PLC on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide

Get daily alerts for JD Supra Trade Law

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Clark Hill PLC.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
Clark Hill PLC
Published
April 10th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Importers and exporters Manufacturers
Industry sector
3241 Chemical Manufacturing
Activity scope
Antidumping filings Trade remedies Steel imports
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
International Trade
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Antitrust & Competition Sanctions

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when JD Supra Trade Law publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!