Changeflow GovPing Trade & Sanctions DOJ NSD Enhances Voluntary Disclosure for Expor...
Priority review Guidance Added Final

DOJ NSD Enhances Voluntary Disclosure for Export, Sanctions

Favicon for www.jdsupra.com JD Supra Trade Law
Published April 3rd, 2026
Detected April 4th, 2026
Email

Summary

The Department of Justice's National Security Division issued guidance on March 30, 2026, extending its Unified Corporate Enforcement Policy to national security violations involving export controls, sanctions, and related matters under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The policy establishes a clear pathway for companies to receive cooperation credit through voluntary self-disclosure, full cooperation, and remediation. DOJ signals increased enforcement activity in this space.

What changed

DOJ NSD announced on March 30, 2026, a new voluntary self-disclosure policy for national security-related violations, including arms control, dual-use export controls, and economic sanctions. The policy integrates NSD into DOJ's broader Unified Corporate Enforcement Policy framework, allowing companies that promptly self-disclose, fully cooperate, and appropriately remediate to potentially receive declinations or reduced penalties. The announcement emphasizes harmonization across DOJ components and signals that NSD will take an increasingly active enforcement role.

Companies operating in cross-border trade, sensitive technologies, or sanctioned jurisdictions should strengthen compliance programs and carefully evaluate disclosure decisions. The policy removes fragmentation between DOJ components and establishes consistent expectations for cooperation credit. Companies failing to disclose face sharpened consequences, while those meeting stringent criteria—including timely disclosure and full cooperation—may be eligible for favorable treatment.

What to do next

  1. Review export control and sanctions compliance programs for effectiveness
  2. Assess whether any potential violations require voluntary self-disclosure under new policy criteria
  3. Ensure disclosure and cooperation protocols align with UCEP standards

Penalties

Companies that fail to disclose potential national security violations face sharpened consequences; companies that meet VSD criteria may receive declinations or reduced penalties

Source document (simplified)

April 3, 2026

Unified Enforcement Meets National Security: DOJ Signals a More Active NSD

Michael Huneke, Moshe Klein, Sandra Moser, Amanda Robinson, Justin Weitz Morgan Lewis + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed

On March 30, 2026, the US Department of Justice’s National Security Division (NSD) provided additional details about the proper mechanism for reporting potential violations of national security laws, including those pertaining to arms control, dual-use export controls, economic sanctions, or otherwise based on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

This development builds directly on DOJ’s broader Unified Corporate Enforcement Policy (UCEP) announced earlier in March to harmonize enforcement principles across DOJ components. By extending those principles into the national security context and emphasizing DOJ’s support for voluntary self-disclosures (VSDs), DOJ is continuing its effort to standardize how corporate misconduct is assessed, incentivized, and prosecuted across the Department.

Importantly, the announcement indicates that NSD expects to increase its enforcement actions, and as such compliance with national security laws, especially those related to export controls, sanctions, and government contracting, is paramount.

The new policy reflects NSD’s intent to ensure that companies have a clear and consistent pathway for receiving cooperation credit when they voluntarily disclose potential misconduct. As with under the UCEP, companies that promptly self-disclose, fully cooperate, and appropriately remediate may be eligible for declinations or reduced penalties.

Critically, the policy removes much of the fragmentation that previously existed between DOJ components, including NSD, by aligning expectations and outcomes. This harmonization reduces uncertainty for companies while simultaneously strengthening DOJ’s ability to enforce compliance where those standards are not met.

NSD has taken an increasingly active role in criminally enforcing export control and sanctions violations, treating them as core national security threats rather than purely regulatory issues. By reiterating NSD’s integration into the Departmentwide disclosure framework, DOJ is signaling that national security–related corporate enforcement will follow the same structured, and potentially more predictable, approach used in such areas as Foreign Corrupt Practices Act enforcement. Corporations should prepare for increased and aggressive enforcement in this space.

The policy underscores that the benefits of VSD are contingent and not automatic. DOJ has emphasized that declinations will be reserved for companies that meet stringent criteria, including timely disclosure and full cooperation. In this respect, the policy also indicates that DOJ hopes to sharpen the consequences for companies that fail to disclose.

Taken together, the national security–focused VSD policy, issued on the heels of the UCEP, underscores DOJ’s shift toward a more centralized and disciplined corporate enforcement regime in which NSD will play an increasingly prominent role.

For companies operating in sectors involving cross-border trade, sensitive technologies, or sanctioned jurisdictions, this development reinforces the importance of robust compliance programs and careful consideration of disclosure decisions. It also indicates that NSD is likely to remain active—and potentially more assertive—in bringing enforcement actions where companies do not avail themselves of DOJ’s voluntary disclosure framework.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • NSD is positioned for further increases in enforcement activity. With clearer rules and integration into DOJ’s broader corporate enforcement regime, NSD is likely to take a more active and assertive role in investigating and prosecuting export control and sanctions violations.
  • DOJ is standardizing expectations across enforcement areas. By extending the UCEP to national security violations DOJ has aligned NSD with other components, creating a more predictable framework for VSDs—but one that is also more rigorous.
  • DOJ and NSD are signaling to industry that VSD is becoming more consequential. The policy reinforces DOJ and NSD’s emphasis that timely disclosure, full cooperation, and remediation can lead to significant benefits while failure to disclose may now carry greater enforcement risk given DOJ’s clearer and more uniform standards. While the decision of whether to voluntarily disclose remains one to be carefully considered, NSD’s announcement is the latest iteration of DOJ’s efforts to tip the scales in favor of disclosure. [View source.]

Send Print Report

Related Posts

Latest Posts

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.

©
Morgan Lewis

Written by:

Morgan Lewis Contact + Follow Michael Huneke + Follow Moshe Klein + Follow Sandra Moser + Follow Amanda Robinson + Follow Justin Weitz + Follow more less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • ✔ Increased readership
  • ✔ Actionable analytics
  • ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Published In:

Department of Justice (DOJ) + Follow Dual Use Goods + Follow Economic Sanctions + Follow Enforcement Actions + Follow Enforcement Priorities + Follow Export Controls + Follow International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) + Follow National Security + Follow Reporting Requirements + Follow Voluntary Disclosure + Follow Criminal + Follow Government Contracting + Follow International Trade + Follow more less

Morgan Lewis on:

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide

Named provisions

Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy Unified Corporate Enforcement Policy

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
DOJ NSD
Published
April 3rd, 2026
Instrument
Guidance
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive
Document ID
DOJ Press Release (2026-03-30)
Supersedes
Prior fragmented NSD disclosure practices

Who this affects

Applies to
Manufacturers Technology companies Importers and exporters
Industry sector
3364 Aerospace & Defense 3341 Computer & Electronics Manufacturing 4231 Wholesale Trade
Activity scope
Export Controls Sanctions Compliance Government Contracting
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Export Controls
Operational domain
Compliance
Compliance frameworks
FCPA ITAR/EAR OFAC Sanctions
Topics
Sanctions International Trade

Get Trade & Sanctions alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when JD Supra Trade Law publishes new changes.

Optional. Personalizes your daily digest.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.