Newtown Estates Community Association v. Walk the Good Life, LLC - Appeal
Summary
The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment in favor of Newtown Estates Community Association against Walk the Good Life, LLC. The case involved alleged violations of community association Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions.
What changed
The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals issued a summary disposition order affirming the Circuit Court of the First Circuit's judgment against Walk the Good Life, LLC. The Association had sued Good Life for violating community association Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions. The appeal focused on the method of service of process, with the Association having moved to serve by certified mail after multiple unsuccessful attempts at personal service.
This ruling affirms the lower court's decision and the validity of the service method employed by the Association. For legal professionals involved in similar disputes, this case highlights the importance of diligent efforts in serving process and the potential for alternative service methods to be approved by the court under Hawaii Revised Statutes. No specific compliance deadlines or penalties are detailed in this appellate decision, as it affirms a prior judgment.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 6, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Newtown Estates Community Association v. Walk the Good Life, LLC
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
- Citations: None known
Docket Number: CAAP-24-0000088
Combined Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed
Intermediate Court of Appeals
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
06-MAR-2026
11:03 AM
Dkt. 51 SO
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
NEWTOWN ESTATES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, by and through its
Board of Directors, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
WALK THE GOOD LIFE, LLC, Defendant-Appellant,
and DOE DEFENDANTS 1-50, Defendants
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
(CASE NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
(By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and Guidry, JJ.)
Walk the Good Life, LLC appeals from the Judgment for
Newtown Estates Community Association entered by the Circuit
Court of the First Circuit on February 27, 2024.1 We affirm.
The Association sued Good Life on November 14, 2022.
The complaint alleged that Good Life owned property in the
Newtown Estates planned community and was violating the
Association's Master Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions.
A process server attempted to serve the complaint on
Good Life at 98-866 Ka#ahele Street, the address of Good Life's
Newtown Estates property, without success.
Good Life's registered agent was Trina M.T. Chun. On
July 26, 2022, the Hawai#i Department of Commerce and Consumer
1
The Honorable Dean E. Ochiai presided.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Affairs (DCCA) showed Chun's address to be 1079 Noio Street.
Good Life was advised that Chun's Hawai#i drivers license also
showed 1079 Noio Street #A as her address. A process server
attempted to serve the complaint on Good Life at 1079 Noio Street
A, without success.
Good Life was advised that Chun owned property at 2525
Date Street, Apt. 606. A process server attempted to serve the
complaint on Good Life at that address, without success.
Good Life was advised that Chun's grandmother resided
at 4300 Wai#alae Avenue PH B2. A process server attempted to
serve the complaint on Good Life at that address, without
success.
On January 9, 2023, the Association moved to serve Good
Life by certified mail to the four addresses it had for Chun,
marked "Restricted Delivery" with return receipt requested, under
Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 634-23,2 -243. The Circuit
Court granted the motion.
2
HRS § 634-23 (2016) provides, in relevant part:
Where an action or proceeding involves or concerns any
property . . . within the jurisdiction of a circuit court:
. . . .
(2) If a defendant is unknown or does not reside
within the State or if, after due diligence, the
defendant cannot be served with process within
the State, and the facts shall appear by
affidavit to the satisfaction of the court, it
may order that service be made as provided by
section 634-24 or by publication, as may be
appropriate; provided that service by
publication shall not be valid unless it is
shown to the satisfaction of the court that
service cannot be made as provided by section
634-24.
3
HRS § 634-24 (2016) provides, in relevant part:
(a) In any case in which, under section 634-23, provision
is made for service of summons as provided by this section,
personal service shall be made upon the defendant wherever
found or the defendant shall be served by registered or
certified mail with request for a return receipt and marked
deliver to addressee only, as ordered by the court.
2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
The envelope addressed to 98-866 Ka#ahele Street was
returned, marked "unclaimed" and "unable to forward."
The envelope addressed to 1079 Noio Street #A was
returned, marked "unclaimed" and "unable to forward."
The USPS.com tracking result for the envelope addressed
to 2525 Date Street, Apt. 606 shows "Notice Left (No Authorized
Recipient Available)" on January 11, 2023.
The envelope addressed to 4300 Wai#alae Avenue PH B2
was returned, marked "unclaimed" and "unable to forward."
On March 14, 2023, the Association moved to serve Good
Life by publication under HRS §§ 634-23(2), -36(b)4. The Circuit
Court granted the motion and ordered that summons be posted on
98-866 Ka#ahele Street. Summons was posted on 98-866 Ka#ahele
Street on April 19, 2023, with a return date of June 13, 2023, at
9:00 a.m. Publication of summons was completed on May 19, 2023.
Good Life did not appear for the June 13, 2023 return
on the summons. Good Life's default was entered on July 7, 2023.
The Association moved for default or summary judgment
on July 31, 2023. A hearing was set for August 24, 2023. Chun
appeared for the hearing and stated her tenant had left the
property. The hearing was continued to October 3, 2023. The
hearing was further continued to October 5, 2023. Counsel for
Good Life appeared on October 5, 2023, and requested another
continuance. The hearing was continued to October 30, 2023.
4
HRS § 634-36 (2016) provides, in relevant part:
(b) If the defendant cannot be found to serve or mail the
summons and the facts shall appear by affidavit or otherwise
to the satisfaction of the court, it may order that service
be made by publication of summons in at least one newspaper
published in the State and having a general circulation in
the circuit in which the action has been instituted, in such
manner and for such time as the court may order, but not
less than once each week in four successive weeks, the last
publication to be not less than twenty-one days prior to the
return date stated therein unless a different time is
prescribed by order of the court.
3
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Good Life filed its opposition to the Association's
motion for default or summary judgment on October 15, 2023. On
October 21, 2023, Good Life moved to set aside the entry of its
default and the orders allowing service by mail and by
publication.
On November 8, 2023, the Circuit Court entered an order
denying Good Life's motion to set aside. On January 16, 2024,
the court entered an order granting in part and denying in part
the Association's motion for default or summary judgment. The
court granted the requested injunctive relief and awarded the
Association $20,000.00 in attorney fees. The Judgment was
entered on February 27, 2024. This appeal followed.
Good Life states eight overlapping points of error. It
challenges: (1) the denial of its motion to set aside the entry
of its default; (2) the granting of the Association's motion for
default or summary judgment; and (3) the award of attorney fees.
(1) We review a motion to set aside an entry of
default for improper service of process de novo. Wagner v. World
Botanical Gardens, Inc., 126 Hawai#i 190, 197, 268 P.3d 443, 450
(App. 2011).
Good Life argues its 2022 DCCA annual report, filed on
September 30, 2022 (two months before the Association sued),
showed Chun's address for service of process to be 1314 South
King Street. The annual report contained no unit or suite
number; we take judicial notice that the multi-story Interstate
Building is at that address.
Good Life argues that "Section 428-110 HRS provides for
service of process to be made upon the registered agent" and
"anyone seeking service of process of a complaint upon a [sic]
LLC must likewise comply by serving the properly registered agent
at the designated address." (Emphasis added.) Good Life cites
no Hawai#i cases to support its argument. Probably because that
is not what the statute says.
4
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
As relevant here, the statute provides:
(a) Service of any notice or process authorized by
law that is issued against a domestic or foreign limited
liability company by any court . . . may be made in the
manner provided by law upon any registered agent, . . . or
upon any member if the company is member-managed, who is
found within the jurisdiction of the court . . . .
. . . .
(d) Nothing contained herein shall limit or affect
the right to serve any process . . . required or permitted
by law to be served upon a limited liability company or
foreign limited liability company in any other manner
permitted by law.
HRS § 428-110 (2004).
Chun submitted a declaration to support Good Life's
motion to set aside the entry of its default. It stated that
Good Life is member-managed and Chun is the sole member. It did
not state she did not live at 1079 Noio Street #A. She did not
explain why she didn't claim the certified mail the Association
sent there.
On this record, we conclude that the Circuit Court did
not err by granting the Association's motion to serve Good Life
by certified mail and, when service by mail was unsuccessful,
granting the motion to serve by publication. Service by
publication was accomplished in accordance with HRS § 634-36(b).
Entry of Good Life's default was proper.
Good Life makes no argument that the entry of its
default should have been set aside for "good cause" under the
standard announced in Chen v. Mah, 146 Hawai#i 157, 177, 457 P.3d
796, 816 (2020).
Other than improper service, Good Life makes no
argument that the Circuit Court erred by granting in part the
Association's motion for default or summary judgment, or by
awarding attorney fees.
5
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
The Judgment entered by the Circuit Court on
February 27, 2024, is affirmed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 6, 2026.
On the briefs:
/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka
Gale L.F. Ching, Presiding Judge
for Defendant-Appellant
Walk the Good Life, LLC. /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth
Associate Judge
Taylor W. Gray,
for Plaintiff-Appellee /s/ Kimberly T. Guidry
Newtown Estates Community Associate Judge
Association, by and through
its Board of Directors.
6
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get State Courts alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals publishes new changes.