Changeflow GovPing State Courts CA Court of Appeal Opinions
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

CA Court of Appeal Opinions

RSS
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

In re J.W. - Juvenile Wardship Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a juvenile court's order adjudicating J.W. a ward of the court. The order followed the sustainment of allegations for vehicle theft and hit-and-run resulting in property damage. The appeal raised no arguable issues.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

VolumeFi Software v. Manian - Intentional Interference Case

The California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, filed an opinion in VolumeFi Software, Inc. v. Zaki Manian. The court affirmed the trial court's order denying Manian's special motion to strike the intentional interference with contract claim, finding the claim did not arise from protected statements.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Bartholomew v. Parking Concepts, Inc. - Opinion Modification

The California Court of Appeal filed an order modifying an opinion in Bartholomew v. Parking Concepts, Inc. The modification adds a footnote to clarify the scope of privacy concerns related to Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) data collection. The court also denied the respondent's petition for rehearing.

Routine Enforcement Data Privacy
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Vartanian v. Swalef - Property Dispute Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision to enforce a settlement agreement in Vartanian v. Swalef. The dispute involved vegetation encroachment between neighboring properties. The court upheld the dismissal of the lawsuit after the settlement terms were met.

Routine Enforcement Real Estate
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Fix the City Inc. v. City of Los Angeles - Legal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in Fix the City, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, ruling that a city ordinance allowing mayoral powers during a housing and homelessness emergency is not preempted by state law. The court found no conflict between the City's administrative code and the California Emergency Services Act.

Routine Enforcement Government Contracting
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Seeley v. Urwell Diversified Holdings - Appeal of Real Estate Transaction Judgment

The California Court of Appeal has issued a non-precedential opinion in Seeley v. Urwell Diversified Holdings. The case involves competing claims related to real estate transactions where buyers fraudulently accepted loans. The appellate court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the judgment from the Superior Court of Riverside County.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Raubitschek v. County of Los Angeles - Premises Liability Appeal

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's summary judgment for the County of Los Angeles in a premises liability case. The court found the sidewalk defect was trivial and could not support liability, affirming the non-precedential opinion.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

People v. Rogers - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has issued an opinion in the case of People v. Rogers. This document is a non-precedential opinion related to a specific legal case. The court has not identified any known citations or subsequent legal actions directly related to this opinion.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Ribstein v. Marx - Civil Harassment Restraining Order Appeal

The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, affirmed an order granting a civil harassment restraining order (CHRO) against the appellant. The case involves allegations of fraud and a subsequent petition for a CHRO.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Woodhouse v. State Bar of Cal. - Vexatious Litigant Ruling

The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's finding that Benjamin Woodhouse is a vexatious litigant. The court held his complaint lacked merit and affirmed orders barring him from future self-represented suits without pre-filing approval and security. This ruling impacts Woodhouse's ability to file future lawsuits.

Priority review Enforcement Judicial Administration

Showing 161–170 of 208 changes

1 15 16 17 18 19 21

Get CA Court of Appeal Opinions alerts

We'll email you when CA Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.