Searching in State Courts · Search everything

2,442 changes

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

State v. Friedel - Arizona Court of Appeals Non-Precedential Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential decision in State v. Friedel, docket number 1 CA-CR 25-0289 PRPC. The court granted review of the petitioner's request for post-conviction relief but ultimately denied the relief sought.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Arizona Court Opinion on Parental Rights

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision regarding parental rights termination. The court found that while abandonment grounds were proven, terminating the father's rights was not in the child's best interest. The decision is non-precedential.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Massachusetts Appeals Court Opinion on Marcie's Care

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming a Juvenile Court judgment that found parents unfit and granted permanent custody of a child to the Department of Children and Families (DCF). The decision addresses parental unfitness due to housing, educational, and medical neglect, as well as substance use and mental health issues.

Routine Enforcement Healthcare
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Commonwealth v. Greg McCollum - Massachusetts Appeals Court Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court vacated judgments against Greg McCollum for operating under the influence (OUI) and negligent operation of a motor vehicle. The court found the verdicts and subsequent offense finding to be in error and set them aside.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Agnitti v. Philip Morris USA Inc. - Massachusetts Appeals Court Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued an opinion in Agnitti v. Philip Morris USA Inc., affirming a jury verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff appealed jury instructions related to claims of negligence, product defect, fraud, and violations of the Consumer Protection Act.

Routine Enforcement Consumer Protection
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Commonwealth v. Jean P. Durand - Criminal Assault and Battery Appeal

The Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed a conviction for assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon causing serious bodily injury. The court found sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction despite the defendant's claim of not being criminally responsible due to mental illness.

Priority review Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Stanley Webb v. George Leontire - Legal Opinion

The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential summary decision in Stanley Webb v. George Leontire. The court affirmed a lower court judgment, allowing cross-examination on criminal matters and upholding the defendant's earned fee.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Stephen Stoute v. Joseph Aoun - Breach of Contract Appeal

The Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a breach of contract and discrimination lawsuit filed by Stephen Stoute against Northeastern University and its trustees. The plaintiff appealed after the Superior Court dismissed the case, including claims related to admission to the university's college of engineering.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Estate of William Pratt v. Amisub of SC, Inc. - Certiorari Dismissed

The Supreme Court of South Carolina has dismissed a writ of certiorari in the case of Estate of William Pratt v. Amisub of SC, Inc. The court found the writ was improvidently granted, effectively upholding the lower court's decision without further review on the merits. This action pertains to appellate case number 2025-000563.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Michael Jerome Jennings v. City of Childersburg - Certified Question Opinion

The Supreme Court of Alabama issued an opinion answering a certified question from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama regarding the state's "stop and identify" statute. The court addressed whether officers can demand physical identification if a person provides an incomplete or unsatisfactory oral response.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice

Showing 11–20 of 2,442 changes

1 2 3 4 245

Get alerts for ""

We'll email you when new changes match this search.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.