2,154 changes Priority review, last 7 days
People v. Paez - Criminal Appeal
The California Court of Appeal modified a criminal judgment, striking a condition that allowed warrantless searches of electronic devices as invalid under People v. Lent. The court upheld other probation conditions, including mandatory participation in a sex offender treatment program.
Center for Biological Diversity v. Public Utilities Commission - Net Energy Metering Tariff
The California Court of Appeal filed an opinion regarding the net energy metering (NEM) tariff, affirming the Public Utilities Commission's successor tariff. The case, Center for Biological Diversity, Inc. v. Public Utilities Com., addresses whether the successor tariff is consistent with state law directing the commission to prevent cost shifts to non-NEM customers.
Zeng v. Wang - Domestic Violence Restraining Order Appeal
The California Court of Appeal affirmed an order granting a new trial on a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) renewal but reversed the DVRO renewal order as it applied to the parties' daughter. The court found the father did not receive adequate notice regarding the daughter's inclusion.
Cruz v. Superior Court CA4/2 - Domestic Violence Restraining Order
The California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, granted a petition for writ of mandate in Cruz v. Superior Court. The court ordered the Superior Court to vacate its order continuing a Domestic Violence Restraining Order hearing and to set a hearing within the timeframe required by Family Code section 242(a). The opinion was filed on March 9, 2026.
Zeng v. Wang - Sanctions and Custody Appeal
The California Court of Appeal filed an opinion in Zeng v. Wang concerning an appeal of sanctions and custody orders. The court affirmed orders denying a request for minor's counsel and a child custody evaluator, while also affirming the denial of a request for sanctions, finding the minute order imposing sanctions not appealable.
Alameda County Taxpayers' Assn. v. City of Oakland - Initiative Measure Validity
The California Court of Appeal ruled on an initiative measure (Measure Y) funding the Oakland Zoo. The court found certain provisions violated the state constitution but were severable, upholding the measure with modifications. The ruling clarifies initiative validity and funding mechanisms for public facilities.
State AGs Continue Antitrust Lawsuit Against Live Nation/Ticketmaster
California Attorney General Rob Bonta and 26 other state attorneys general announced they will continue their antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation/Ticketmaster, rejecting the U.S. DOJ's settlement. The states aim to hold the company accountable for anticompetitive conduct harming consumers and the live music industry.
Federal Court Strikes Down HUD/USDA Energy Rule
A federal court has struck down a Biden-era rule from HUD and USDA that imposed stricter energy efficiency requirements on new home construction financed by federal programs. The court ruled the agencies lacked statutory authority and that the rule would negatively impact affordable housing availability.
Child Trust Funds: cETNs Banned from April 2026
HM Revenue & Customs has issued the Child Trust Funds (Amendment) Regulations 2026, which will ban cryptoasset exchange traded notes (cETNs) from being held in Child Trust Funds effective April 6, 2026. Existing holdings can remain in the account.
ISA Regulations Amended for Long Term Asset Funds and cETNs
HM Revenue & Customs has amended the Individual Savings Account Regulations 2026 to allow investments in Long Term Asset Funds and cryptoasset exchange traded notes (cETNs) within ISAs. These changes aim to extend investor choice while managing risks associated with digital finance.
Get alerts for ""
We'll email you when new changes match this search.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.