Search

Arizona Court Opinion on Parental Rights

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision regarding parental rights termination. The court found that while abandonment grounds were proven, terminating the father's rights was not in the child's best interest. The decision is non-precedential.

State v. Friedel - Arizona Court of Appeals Non-Precedential Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential decision in State v. Friedel, docket number 1 CA-CR 25-0289 PRPC. The court granted review of the petitioner's request for post-conviction relief but ultimately denied the relief sought.

Arizona Appeals Court Opinion on Parental Rights Case

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to terminate parental rights for two children. The father appealed, arguing insufficient diligent effort was made for reunification services. The court found that reunification services were provided and that the termination was appropriate.

jbi/twin v. Palacios - Workers' Compensation Appeal

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed an Industrial Commission award finding that an employee requires further active medical treatment, including lower back surgery. The decision is designated as non-precedential.

In Re Dependency as to B.H. - Arizona Non-Precedential Opinion

The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential memorandum decision in the dependency case of B.H. The court affirmed the superior court's order declining to adjudicate the minor as dependent. The decision is not for official publication.

Arizona Court Opinion on Parental Rights

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to terminate a mother's parental rights. The decision was based on the mother's history of substance abuse and neglect, as well as the child's exposure to substances at birth. This is a non-precedential decision.

Arizona Court of Appeals - Parental Rights Termination

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of parental rights for a mother due to ongoing substance abuse and neglect. The decision, docketed as 1 CA-JV 25-0144, is non-precedential and applies only to the specific case.