MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR GRADE III HEMORRHOIDS - Observational Study NCT07534761
Summary
NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registered a new observational study (NCT07534761) evaluating minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for Grade III hemorrhoids using a closed excisional hemorrhoidectomy technique. The IDEAL Phase 2a study aims to assess reproducibility and technical feasibility of MIS in anal surgery with approximately 50 participants.
What changed
This document registers a new observational clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov investigating minimally invasive surgery for Grade III hemorrhoid treatment. The study uses the IDEAL Phase 2a framework to evaluate reproducibility of the technique, which employs enhanced visualization devices to improve surgical precision and reduce tissue damage compared to standard closed excisional hemorrhoidectomy.
For compliance and clinical operations teams, this represents an emerging area of surgical innovation that may inform future clinical practice guidelines. Healthcare providers conducting or considering similar surgical techniques should monitor this study for outcomes data that could influence standard-of-care considerations.
What to do next
- Monitor for updates
Archived snapshot
Apr 16, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR GRADE III HEMORRHOIDS
Observational NCT07534761 Kind: OBSERVATIONAL Apr 16, 2026
Abstract
Hemorrhoids are vascular-elastic structures of the anal canal that contribute to continence. Their enlargement and descent lead to symptoms such as rectal bleeding and the sensation of anal swelling, known as hemorrhoidal syndrome. In advanced cases (Goligher Grade III-IV), surgery is the only effective treatment. Closed excisional hemorrhoidectomy (CEH), based on the Ferguson technique, is one of the standard procedures. Although effective in the long term, it causes severe postoperative pain. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) employs enhanced visualization devices to improve surgical precision and reduce tissue damage. While widely used in specialties with small surgical fields, it has not yet been explored in anal surgery. Its advantages include reduced tissue injury and improved healing, although it presents a learning curve and an initially longer surgical time. The IDEAL framework evaluates surgical innovations in five stages: Idea, Development, Exploration, Evaluation, and Long-Term Study. The IDEAL phase 2a is aimed at the optimization and technical definition of surgical innovation with a focus on continuous improvement based on real clinical practice, laying the foundation for broader and more rigorous subsequent studies.
Since no previous studies on the application of MIS in CEH have been found, the investigators propose a study within Stage 2A of the IDEAL model to assess the reproducibility of this technique. The investigators believe its incorporation into cl...
Conditions: Hemorrhoidectomy, Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique
Interventions: Minimally Invasive hemorrhoidectomy
Related changes
Get daily alerts for ClinicalTrials.gov Studies
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from NIH.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when ClinicalTrials.gov Studies publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.