Observational Falls Validation Study for Traumatic Brain Bleeding
Summary
NIH registered an observational study (NCT07536906) to validate a rapid bedside decision rule guiding emergency physicians on when older adults should receive brain scans to diagnose traumatic brain bleeding. The study addresses falls in adults over 65, which result in 500,000 Canadian emergency department visits annually. Researchers will assess whether the clinical decision rule effectively identifies patients requiring imaging for intracranial bleed detection.
What changed
The study is an observational trial designed to validate a rapid bedside clinical decision rule for detecting traumatic brain bleeding in older adults who have fallen. The decision rule aims to guide emergency physicians on patient selection for brain imaging.
For healthcare providers, this study represents an opportunity to participate in research that could establish evidence-based criteria for ordering brain scans in elderly fall patients, potentially reducing unnecessary imaging while ensuring timely diagnosis of intracranial bleeds.
Archived snapshot
Apr 18, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Falls Validation Study
Observational NCT07536906 Kind: OBSERVATIONAL Apr 17, 2026
Abstract
Each year, one in three adults over the age of 65 has a fall. These falls lead to half a million Canadian emergency department patient visits annually and falls in older adults account for more than 3% of all emergency department visits.
We have created a rapid, simple bedside test (known as a decision rule) to guide emergency physicians on when older adults should have a brain scan to diagnose traumatic brain bleeding. We will check this this decision rule works well in guiding who needs a brain scan.
Conditions: Intracranial Bleed, Falls
Interventions: Clinical Decision Rule
Related changes
Get daily alerts for ClinicalTrials.gov Studies
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from NIH.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when ClinicalTrials.gov Studies publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.