Changeflow GovPing Labor & Employment Metal fabrication company sentenced after appre...
Urgent Enforcement Added Final

Metal fabrication company sentenced after apprentice guillotine injury

Favicon for press.hse.gov.uk UK HSE Prosecutions & Press
Filed March 30th, 2026
Detected March 30th, 2026
Email

Summary

HSE prosecuted MTL Advanced Ltd for breaching Regulation 11(1) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 after a 17-year-old apprentice suffered a crush injury when their thumb contacted a guillotine machine's clamps during apprenticeship training. The company was fined £140,000 and ordered to pay £5,013 in costs plus £2,000 Victim Surcharge at Sheffield Magistrates' Court. HSE found the company failed to identify a dangerous gap in the guillotine bed even after the incident occurred.

What changed

MTL Advanced Ltd (Rotherham-based metal fabrication company) pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 11(1) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998. A 17-year-old apprentice suffered a crush injury when their thumb contacted the machine's clamps during metal cutting practice. HSE investigation identified a large gap in the guillotine bed allowing access to dangerous parts, and critically, the company had failed to identify this risk even after the incident. The company was fined £140,000 with £5,013 costs and £2,000 Victim Surcharge.

Employers with apprentices or young workers in training must immediately review guarding on all machinery, particularly equipment used in training workshops. Companies should assess risks specific to young and inexperienced workers and ensure proper inspection regimes for workshop equipment. Failure to adequately protect apprentices can result in significant financial penalties and prosecution.

What to do next

  1. Review and remediate guarding on all metalworking machinery including guillotines and presses
  2. Conduct risk assessments specific to young persons and apprentices in training environments
  3. Implement systematic inspection protocols for all workshop equipment to identify hazardous access points

Penalties

Fine of £140,000 plus £5,013 costs and £2,000 Victim Surcharge

Source document (simplified)

Rotherham metal fabrication company sentenced after young apprentice injured during apprenticeship training

Search news

30th March 2026

Press release Prosecution – 17-year-old apprentice injured by a metal cutting guillotine

– An HSE investigation found a large gap in the bed of the guillotine that allowed access to dangerous parts of the machinery

– The company had failed to identify risk even after the incident had taken place

A Rotherham-based metal fabrication company has been sentenced after pleading guilty to health and safety failings that led to a young apprentice being injured by dangerous parts of a metal cutting guillotine during training.

On Friday 8 November 2024, a 17-year-old apprentice at MTL Advanced Ltd was cutting sheet metal in preparation for welding practice as part of their apprenticeship training. The guillotine was located within a dedicated Apprentice Training Workshop, where first-year apprentices learn and practise metal fabrication techniques before moving into the company’s main manufacturing areas in their second and third years.

The apprentice made several successful cuts, but on the final cut their thumb came into contact with the machine’s clamps, causing a crush injury.

Image from site

The HSE launched an investigation and identified, from documents provided by the company before an on-site visit, that a large gap in the bed of the guillotine was allowing access to dangerous parts of the machinery. Critically, the company had failed to identify this risk even after the incident had taken place.

A Prohibition Notice was served remotely by HSE to control the ongoing risk. Following its service, HSE Inspectors attended the site and identified further issues with the guillotine requiring immediate remedy.

HSE provides extensive guidance on managing risks in the workplace, including preventing access to dangerous parts of machinery and employing young persons in training. Guidance notes that young people are likely to be new to the workplace and so are at more risk of injury in the first six months of a job, as they may be less aware of risks.

A wider inspection of the Apprentice Training Workshop revealed additional health and safety failings, including access to live electrical parts, further instances of unguarded dangerous machinery, and deficiencies in the system of inspection for workshop equipment.

MTL Advanced Ltd, of Britannia House, Junction Street, Darwen, Lancashire, BB3 2RB, pleaded guilty to breaching Regulation 11(1) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998. The company was fined £140,000 and ordered to pay full costs of £5,013, with a Victim Surcharge of £2,000, at Sheffield Magistrates’ Court.

Speaking after the hearing, HM Principal Inspector of Health and Safety Chris Tilley said: “Young people and apprentices are at the beginning of their career and so  when it comes to workplace risks,  employers must  take particular care to assess those risks and fulfil their duty to keep them safe. Had this machinery been effectively guarded, this injury would never have happened.”

HSE provides extensive guidance on managing workplace risks, including preventing access to dangerous parts of machinery and employing young people in training:

This prosecution was brought by HSE enforcement lawyer Chloe Ward and Paralegal Officer Hannah Snelling.

Further Information

  1. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is Britain’s national regulator for workplace health and safety. We are dedicated to protecting people and places, and helping everyone lead safer and healthier lives.
  2. More information about the legislation referred to in this case is available.
  3. Further details on the latest HSE news releases is available.
  4. Relevant guidance can be found here Managing risks and risk assessment at work: Overview – HSE
  5. HSE does not pass sentences, set guidelines or collect any fines imposed. Relevant sentencing guidelines must be followed unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so.  The sentencing guidelines for health and safety offences can be found here.

Categories

Media relations contacts

Subscribe

Named provisions

Regulation 11(1) of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
HSE
Filed
March 30th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive

Who this affects

Applies to
Employers Manufacturers Educational institutions
Industry sector
2361 Construction 3114 Food & Beverage Manufacturing 3361 Automotive Manufacturing
Activity scope
Workplace Machine Safety Young Worker Protection Apprenticeship Training Safety
Geographic scope
United Kingdom GB

Taxonomy

Primary area
Occupational Safety
Operational domain
Health and Safety
Compliance frameworks
OSHA
Topics
Manufacturing Safety Young Workers Machine Safety

Get Labor & Employment alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when UK HSE Prosecutions & Press publishes new changes.

Optional. Personalizes your daily digest.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.