Recent changes
Family Behavioral Health Inc. v. 387 Main Street Realty Trust - Appeals Court Opinion
The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming a lower court's judgment against 387 Main Street Realty Trust and Raymond Bonneville. The defendants were found liable for breach of contract, interference with business relations, and unfair trade practices. The court found the defendants' arguments regarding sufficiency of evidence were waived.
Coppenrath v. Pontiff Cranberries - Appeals Court Opinion
The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion in Coppenrath v. Pontiff Cranberries, affirming a lower court's dismissal of a complaint challenging an earth removal permit. The court found the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the permit issued by the town of Carver's earth removal committee.
Adoption of Ilee - Massachusetts Appeals Court
The Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed a Juvenile Court judge's decision to terminate a mother's parental rights and approve adoption by foster parents. The mother appealed, but the court found no error in the judge's findings or rulings.
Adoption of Jazzy - Massachusetts Appeals Court Opinion
The Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a non-precedential opinion affirming a lower court's decision to terminate parental rights and approve adoption by the children's maternal aunt and uncle. The parents appealed, arguing the court failed to determine reasonable efforts by the Department of Children and Families, adequately consider guardianship, or order post-decree contact.
Corona-Montano v. United States - Alien Transport Sentencing Appeal
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's sentencing enhancement for transporting an unaccompanied minor in the case of Luis Francisco Corona-Montano. The court held that the Sentencing Guidelines do not require scienter for this enhancement, affirming the 71-month sentence.
Culver City v. Federal Aviation Administration - Standing to Challenge Air Traffic Procedures
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed petitions from the Cities of Malibu and Culver City challenging FAA air traffic procedures. The court found the cities lacked standing to sue, as they failed to demonstrate a reasonable probability of injury from the challenged 2018 amendments to the NextGen initiative.
Malibu and Culver City v. FAA - Standing for NextGen Initiative Challenges
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed petitions from the Cities of Malibu and Culver City challenging the FAA's NextGen initiative. The court found the cities lacked standing to sue over the 2018 amendments and that challenges to the original 2016 procedures were untimely.
State v. Aliff - Probation Revocation Appeal
The Court of Appeals of Kansas affirmed a district court's decision to revoke Allen Dale Aliff's probation and impose his underlying 33-month prison sentence. The appeal was submitted for summary disposition.
People v. Baltazar - Criminal Resentencing Appeal
The California Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's denial of a resentencing petition filed by Ernesto Baltazar under Penal Code section 1172.6. The court found substantial evidence that Baltazar aided and abetted a killing with intent to kill, thus disqualifying him from resentencing.
People v. Nelson - Criminal Appeal
The California Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of a petition for resentencing filed by Charles L. Nelson. The court found that Nelson was the actual perpetrator of the offenses and therefore ineligible for relief under Penal Code section 1172.6. The appeal was reviewed under the Wende/Anders standard.
Last 7 days
Most active sources
Browse Categories
Activity
Get daily alerts
Morning digest delivered to your inbox. Free.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Categories
Get US Courts alerts
Daily digest of regulatory changes. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get US Courts alerts
We'll email you when new US Courts regulatory changes are detected.