Kentucky Supreme Court Suspends Lawyer for 60 Days
Summary
The Kentucky Supreme Court has suspended attorney Michael R. P. Calilung for 60 days due to violations of professional conduct rules. Calilung previously received a 120-day suspension, with 60 days served, for earlier violations. Despite completing ethics training, he continued to represent clients in eviction proceedings after his suspension, leading to this new disciplinary action.
What changed
The Kentucky Supreme Court has issued an Opinion and Order suspending attorney Michael R. P. Calilung for an additional 60 days. This action follows a previous suspension where Calilung was found guilty of violating multiple Supreme Court Rules (SCR) related to professional conduct, including duties to clients and the court. Although he completed a required ethics program and paid associated costs, Calilung subsequently represented clients in at least 499 eviction proceedings, with 453 new cases filed after his prior suspension order.
This new suspension highlights the critical importance of adhering to court-ordered disciplinary measures. Calilung's continued practice of law while suspended constitutes a serious violation, necessitating immediate action by legal professionals to ensure compliance with all court orders and bar association rules. Failure to comply with such orders can result in further disciplinary actions, including extended suspensions or disbarment. The Court's order implies that Calilung must cease all legal representation and comply with reinstatement procedures before resuming practice.
What to do next
- Cease all legal representation immediately.
- Comply with reinstatement procedures per SCR 3.501.
- Notify all clients in writing of inability to represent and provide copies to KBA Director within ten days.
Penalties
60-day suspension from the practice of law.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 19, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
In Re: Michael R. P. Calilung
Kentucky Supreme Court
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 2022-SC-0469
- Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Disposition: OPINION AND ORDER SUSPENDING FOR 60 DAYS
Disposition
OPINION AND ORDER SUSPENDING FOR 60 DAYS
Combined Opinion
TO BE PUBLISHED
Supreme Court of Kentucky
2022-SC-0469-KB
IN RE: MICHAEL R. P. CALILUNG
IN SUPREME COURT
OPINION AND ORDER
Michael R. P. Calilung was admitted to the practice of law with the
Kentucky Bar Association (KBA) on May 21, 1993. His KBA number is 84663,
and his bar roster address is 4119 Taylor Blvd., Louisville, KY 40215.
Previously, in In re: Calilung, 671 S.W.3d 109 (Ky. 2023), this Court
entered an Opinion and Order in relation to Office of Bar Counsel (OBC) File
20-DIS-0048. Calilung was found guilty of violating Supreme Court Rule (SCR)
3.130(1.3), SCR 3.130(3.3)(a)(1), and SCR 3.130(3.4)(c), and was suspended
from the practice of law for 120 days, with 60 days to be served and the
balance probated for two years.
Calilung was further ordered to complete the Commonwealth’s Ethics
and Professional Enhancement Program (EPEP) within twelve months of the
order, and was to comply with the requirements of SCR 3.390, including:
notifying all of his clients in writing of his inability to represent them and to
provide copies of those letters or emails to the Director of the Kentucky Bar
Association within ten days of the entry of the order, to return all active files to
the client or to new counsel, to return all unearned attorney fees and client
property to the client, to not accept new clients or collect unearned fees until
his reinstatement, and to cancel all pending advertisements, terminate any
advertising activity for the duration of the suspension and not allow his name
to be used by a law firm in any manner until his reinstatement. He was also
ordered to pay all costs associated with the proceedings in accordance with
SCR 3.450(2).
Calilung did attend and complete the EPEP, and he paid the costs of the
disciplinary action. However, Calilung has not taken the steps required to
reinstate his license pursuant to SCR 3.501. On April 3, 2024, the OBC
learned that Calilung was representing clients in eviction proceedings in
Jefferson District Court. He is shown as attorney of record on at least 499
eviction cases, and 453 of those were new cases entered after the Court’s
March 23, 2023, order. The OBC filed a motion to reopen the case in this
Court on March 17, 2025, which was granted. On August 21, 2025, the OBC
filed a motion to show cause why Calilung’s probated suspension should not be
imposed. This Court granted the OBC’s request and entered a show cause
order on September 12, 2025. Calilung did not respond to the order.
Based on the foregoing, this Court holds that Calilung has violated the
terms of its March 23, 2023, order and hereby ORDERS as follows:
1) Michael R. P. Calilung shall be suspended from the practice of law for
sixty days upon entry of this order;
2) Michael R. P. Calilung shall receive no new disciplinary charges
issued by the Inquiry Commission;
3) Pursuant to SCR 3.390, Calilung:
2
a. Shall notify all clients in writing of his inability to continue to
represent them and shall furnish copies of all such letters to the
Director of the Kentucky Bar Association. These notices shall be
mailed or emailed to the respective clients within ten (10) days of
the entry of this Order, if not already mailed or emailed. Calilung
shall make arrangements to return all active files to the client or
new counsel and shall return all unearned attorney fees and client
property to the client and shall advise the Director of such
arrangements within the ten (10) day period;
b. Must not, during the term of suspension and until reinstatement,
accept new clients or collect unearned fees;
c. Must immediately cancel any pending advertisements; must
terminate any advertising activity for the duration of the term of
suspension; and must not allow his name to be used by a law firm
in any manner until he is reinstated.
All sitting. All concur.
ENTERED: March 19, 2026.
CHIEF JUSTICE
3
Named provisions
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Kentucky Supreme Court publishes new changes.