US Courts

Bombaugh v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America - Insurance Dispute

The Massachusetts Appeals Court reversed a lower court's decision in favor of Maryanne Bombaugh in her dispute with Unum Life Insurance Company of America over disability benefits. The court found the policy language was not ambiguous and ruled in favor of the insurer.

Arizona v. Soto - Sentencing Discretion for Child Molestation

The Arizona Court of Appeals reviewed a case concerning sentencing discretion for child molestation. The court reversed in part and remanded for resentencing, finding the trial court erred in its interpretation of A.R.S. § 13-705(M) regarding concurrent sentencing.

Swenson v. Swenson - Marriage Dissolution Appeal

The Arizona Court of Appeals issued a non-precedential decision in Swenson v. Swenson, addressing an appeal from a marriage dissolution decree. The court affirmed in part and vacated/remanded in part, indicating further consideration is needed on specific issues related to asset division.

Estate of Elmer Gordon Waggoner v. Anonymous Health System, Inc. - Immunity Ruling

The Indiana Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision, ruling that healthcare providers are immune from civil liability for actions taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic under state statute. The court found that a preliminary determination of immunity could be made without a medical-review panel.

Uber Technologies v. City of Seattle - First Amendment Challenge to Ordinance

The Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction against Seattle's App-Based Worker Deactivation Rights Ordinance. The court held the ordinance regulates non-expressive conduct and does not violate the First Amendment, even if it compels commercial speech.

Ninth Circuit Opinion: Uber Technologies vs. City of Seattle

The Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction sought by Uber Technologies and Maplebear Inc. The court held that Seattle's App-Based Worker Deactivation Rights Ordinance does not violate the First Amendment, finding it regulates non-expressive conduct rather than speech.

People v. Alvarez - Criminal Sentencing Appeal

The California Court of Appeal vacated a prior strike finding against Francisco Juan Alvarez, remanding for further proceedings. This decision follows reconsideration in light of a new Supreme Court precedent regarding the retroactive application of Assembly Bill No. 333 to prior strike convictions.

People v. Law - Felony Murder Law Resentencing

The California Court of Appeal reversed a trial court's denial of a resentencing petition filed under Penal Code section 1172.6, concerning changes to felony murder laws. The appellate court found the trial court erred in its definition of reckless indifference, requiring a remand for further proceedings.

Ryan v. Salinas Union High School District - Appeal of Order Denying Motion to Vacate Judgment

The California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District, filed a non-precedential opinion on March 4, 2026, in Ryan v. Salinas Union High School District. The court dismissed the appeal of an order denying a motion to vacate a judgment, finding the order was not appealable.

Guardianship of F.W. - California Court of Appeal Opinion

The California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District, has reversed a lower court's denial of a guardianship petition for a minor, F.W. The appellate court found the trial court applied the incorrect legal standard and misunderstood relevant case law, remanding the case for further proceedings.