Changeflow GovPing US Courts

Recent changes

Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Harrington v. Albarran - Habeas Corpus Filing

A habeas corpus petition was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in the case of Harrington v. Albarran et al. The filing, dated March 4, 2026, concerns an alien detainee and includes a filing fee of $5.00.

Routine Enforcement Immigration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

A.B. v. United States - Civil Complaint Filed

A civil case, A.B. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), was filed on March 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge. The case number is 3:26-cv-01886.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Justin v. Dish Delivering Innovation In Supportive Housing - Civil Rights

A civil rights case, Justin v. Dish Delivering Innovation In Supportive Housing, was filed on March 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint related to accommodations under federal question jurisdiction.

Routine Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

McPhee v. Reinalt-Thomas Corporation - Civil Case Filing

The Reinalt-Thomas Corporation has filed a Notice of Removal in the case McPhee v. Reinalt-Thomas Corporation, case number 4:26-cv-01894, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was originally filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Sanchez v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, Sanchez v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, was filed on March 4, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from Santa Clara County Superior Court, with Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC as the filing party.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Exelixis Inc. v. Smith - Contract Dispute

Exelixis Inc. filed a contract dispute case against Smith in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was removed from the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, and filed on March 4, 2026, with a filing fee of $405.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.ca4.uscourts.gov

Wilson Ochar v. Ameris Bank - Appeal Dismissed in Part, Affirmed in Part

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed in part and affirmed in part the district court's order in Wilson Ochar v. Ameris Bank. The appeal regarding the dismissal of consolidated actions was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction due to a late filing, while the prefiling injunction was affirmed.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.ca4.uscourts.gov

US v. Kenneth Hart - Opinion Affirmed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's resentencing of Kenneth Wayne Hart to 300 months. Hart was convicted of drug and sex trafficking offenses. The court found his arguments regarding procedural and substantive unreasonableness of the sentence to be without merit.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for www.ca4.uscourts.gov

Crawford v. Prince George's County Schools - ADA Claim Affirmed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision granting summary judgment to Prince George's County Public Schools in a failure-to-accommodate claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The court denied a motion to dismiss the appeal as untimely, finding excusable neglect for an extension.

Routine Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.ca4.uscourts.gov

Elon Musk Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Deposition Protective Order

Elon Musk and several government entities filed a petition for a writ of mandamus with the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals after a district court denied their motion for a protective order. The protective order sought to prevent the deposition of Musk and other high-ranking officials in a case alleging violations of the Appointments Clause and separation of powers principles.

Priority review Enforcement Judicial Administration

Showing 3501–3510 of 5,325 changes

1 349 350 351 352 353 533

Get US Courts alerts

Daily digest of regulatory changes. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get US Courts alerts

We'll email you when new US Courts regulatory changes are detected.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.