Recent changes
US v. Jerome Brown - Criminal Appeal
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision in the case of US v. Jerome Brown. The court found that while the district judge improperly participated in plea negotiations, the defendant did not suffer prejudice sufficient to vacate his plea. The appeal concerned drug trafficking and firearm possession charges.
USA v. Jerome Brown - Rehearing Granted
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has granted a petition for panel rehearing in the case of USA v. Jerome Brown. The court vacated its prior opinion and judgment from December 11, 2025, and will issue an amended opinion and re-enter judgment. Rehearing en banc was denied.
People of Michigan v. Thomas Stephen Johnston - Affirmation of Lower Court Judgment
The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's denial of a motion to suppress evidence in the case of People of Michigan v. Thomas Stephen Johnston. The court found that the search warrant, though specifying alcohol testing, was sufficiently broad to include testing for THC.
People of Michigan v. Rickey Dale Richett - Criminal Appeal
The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment against Rickey Dale Richett. Richett was convicted of second-degree murder and assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder. The court found no errors in the trial proceedings.
Jasmin Adilovic v. Monroe LLC - Opinion Vacated and Remanded
The Michigan Court of Appeals vacated its prior judgment and remanded the case of Jasmin Adilovic v. Monroe LLC for reconsideration. The court's prior decision had affirmed a lower court's order granting summary disposition to the employer, Monroe LLC, based on a limited statute of limitations. The Supreme Court's remand directs the Court of Appeals to apply a new precedent, Rayford v. American House Roseville I, LLC.
Dana Mark Gamarra v. Oakland County - Court Opinion
The Michigan Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Dana Mark Gamarra v. Oakland County, concerning an automobile accident. The court affirmed in part and reversed in part the trial court's decision regarding summary disposition for the defendants, remanding the case for further proceedings.
In Re K M Gill Minor - Parental Rights Termination
The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's order terminating parental rights for K M Gill Minor. The respondent's parental rights were terminated under MCL 712A.19b(3)(h) due to his lengthy prison sentence for murder and felony firearm charges, which will deprive the child of a normal home for over two years.
In Re Grace Minors - Parental Rights Termination Appeal
The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's termination of a mother's parental rights to her minor children. The court found the mother lacked parenting skills, failed to engage with services, and termination was in the children's best interest. The appellate court noted disappointment with the late filing of a brief by the Department of Health and Human Services.
Clark-Rose v. Mgm Grand Detroit LLC - Lower Court Judgment Affirmed
The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's judgment in favor of MGM Grand Detroit LLC in a case brought by former employee Taniesha Clark-Rose. The court found that MGM supported its motion for summary disposition with admissible evidence, rejecting the plaintiff's appeal.
Rp v. Tv - Lower Court Judgment Affirmed
The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court's decision to deny a motion to terminate a personal protection order (PPO). The case involved allegations of assault and disputes over financial matters concerning a family member.
Last 7 days
Most active sources
Browse Categories
Activity
Get daily alerts
Morning digest delivered to your inbox. Free.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Categories
Get US Courts alerts
Daily digest of regulatory changes. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get US Courts alerts
We'll email you when new US Courts regulatory changes are detected.