Changeflow GovPing Healthcare Regulation HRSA Announces 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program ...
Priority review Notice Added Consultation

HRSA Announces 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program Application Process

Email

Summary

The HRSA announced the application process for a voluntary 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program for qualifying drug manufacturers. The agency is also requesting public comment on the program's structure and application process, with a deadline of September 8, 2025.

What changed

The Health Resources and Service Administration (HRSA) has announced the application process for a voluntary 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program. This program offers a mechanism for qualifying drug manufacturers to provide the 340B ceiling price on select drugs to covered entities through a post-purchase rebate model, rather than the traditional upfront discount. The agency is seeking public comment on the program's structure and application process.

Covered entities and drug manufacturers should review the notice to understand the proposed rebate model, which differs significantly from the established upfront discount system. Interested manufacturers meeting specific criteria are invited to apply for participation. The public comment period closes on September 8, 2025, and comments should be submitted via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. While HRSA will consider comments, it is not obligated to act on them. This notice is effective immediately but may be revised.

What to do next

  1. Review the HRSA 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program announcement and criteria.
  2. Submit comments on the program structure and application process by September 8, 2025.
  3. If a qualifying drug manufacturer, consider applying for the pilot program.

Source document (simplified)

Content

ACTION:

Announcement of application process for the 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program and request for public comment; Correction.

SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Health Resources and Service Administration (HRSA), Office of Pharmacy
Affairs (OPA), which administers the 340B Drug Pricing Program (340B Program), is issuing this Notice to announce the availability
of a 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program as a voluntary mechanism for qualifying drug manufacturers to effectuate the 340B ceiling
price on select drugs to all covered entities, and to collect comments on the structure and application process of the 340B
Rebate Model Pilot Program, as outlined in this Notice. OPA will consider comments received but is under no obligation to
respond to or act on the comments. This Notice is effective immediately as published, unless revised by a future notice. OPA
reserves the right to issue revisions or addenda to this Notice at a later date (including, but not limited to, revisions
or addenda informed by public comment).

DATES:

Submit comments no later than September 8, 2025.

ADDRESSES:

Electronic comments should be submitted Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions on the website for submitting comments. Include the HHS Docket No. HRSA-2025-14619 in your comments.
All comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov. Please do not include any personally identifiable or confidential business information you do not want publicly disclosed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Chantelle Britton, Director, Office of Pharmacy Affairs, HRSA, 5600 Fishers Lane, Mail Stop 14W52, Rockville, MD 20857; email: 340Bpricing@hrsa.gov; telephone 301-594-4353.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OPA has received inquiries from manufacturers related to different proposed rebate models for the 340B Program, primarily
to address 340B and Maximum Fair Price (MFP) deduplication, (1) but also to facilitate other aims such as the prevention of 340B Medicaid duplicate discounts and diversion.

A “rebate” for purposes of this pilot program, means a reimbursement made from the manufacturer to the covered entity in the
amount of the standard acquisition cost (i.e., wholesale acquisition cost) of a covered outpatient drug less the statutory 340B ceiling price as defined at section 340B(a)(1)
of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA).

Whereas the 340B Program has traditionally operated as an upfront discount program (i.e., a covered entity purchases a covered outpatient drug at the discounted 340B price), under a rebate model, a covered entity
would pay for the drug at a higher price upfront and then later receive a post-purchase rebate that reflects the difference
between the higher initial price and the 340B price. Section 340B(a)(1) of the PHSA states, “[t]he Secretary shall enter into
an agreement with each manufacturer of covered outpatient drugs under which the amount required to be paid (taking into account
any rebate or discount, as provided by the Secretary) to the manufacturer for covered outpatient drugs . . . purchased by
a covered entity . . . does not exceed [designated prices].” As the Department has previously informed stakeholders, implementing
a rebate model without Secretarial approval would violate section 340B(a)(1) of the PHSA.

Due to the significant amount of feedback received from (or on behalf of) manufacturers and covered entities regarding implementation
of rebate models, and in light of the fact that rebate models could fundamentally shift how the 340B Program has operated
for over 30 years, OPA is inviting certain drug manufacturers, that meet the criteria described below, to apply for participation
in a voluntary 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program for a minimum of 1 year. OPA is introducing this pilot program to test the
rebate model on a select group of drugs (as described below) in a methodical and thoughtful approach to ensure a fair and
transparent 340B rebate model process for all stakeholders involved. OPA is also implementing this pilot to better understand
the merits and shortcomings of the rebate model from stakeholders' perspectives, and to inform OPA consideration of any future
340B rebate models consistent with the 340B statute and the Administration's goals.

The scope of this voluntary 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program will be limited to the NDC-11s included on the CMS Medicare Drug
Price Negotiation Selected Drug List, (2) regardless of payer.

The first call to submit plans for OPA review is for the manufacturers with Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program (MDPNP)
Agreements with CMS for initial price applicability year 2026. (3) Manufacturer plans for participation in the 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program should be submitted to 340BPricing@hrsa.gov no later than September 15, 2025. Approvals will be made by October 15, 2025, for a January 1, 2026, effective date. Manufacturers
may not implement plans without first receiving approval in accordance with section 340B(a)(1) of the PHSA. OPA may announce
a call for plans from manufacturers with MDPNP Agreements for other applicability years, at a later time.

After assessment of the pilot, which will include OPA's evaluation of data and reports received from the participating manufacturers
on the effectiveness of the model and covered entity and other stakeholder feedback, OPA may consider expanding the rebate
pilot to other drugs purchased under the 340B Program. Additional information about manufacturer reporting and stakeholder
feedback opportunities will be provided in the future.

Manufacturer plans for the 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program should include the criteria outlined below. Manufacturer plans
that exceed or go beyond these criteria should include detailed justification and will be subject to additional review by
OPA prior to implementation. OPA will review submitted plans and notify manufacturers if they are approved to participate
in the 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program. Submitted plans should not exceed 1,000 words and should address all of the criteria
below. OPA reserves the right to revoke approval of a manufacturer plan at any time if a manufacturer is not in compliance
with the criteria outlined in the “Rebate Model Pilot Program Criteria” below.

OPA is seeking public comment on all aspects of this Notice and the 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program. Specifically, commenters
are encouraged to include supporting data and sources underpinning any factual claims. Commenters should also consider the
following questions when providing comment on this Notice and the Pilot Program:

  • Are there any additional flexibilities to maximize efficiency and efficacy for participating manufacturers that should be considered in the pilot design?
  • Are there any additional safeguards to mitigate adverse, unintended impacts for covered entities that should be considered in the pilot design?
  • Are there any additional data or reporting elements that should be required to improve implementation and evaluation of the pilot? • Are there any potential implementation issues not yet sufficiently accounted for in the pilot design (e.g., logistical or administrative burdens)?

Rebate Model Pilot Program Criteria

General Requirements

  1. Plan should include assurances that all costs for data submission through an Information Technology (IT) platform be borne
    by the manufacturer and no additional administrative costs of running the rebate model shall be passed onto the covered entities.

  2. Plan should allow for 60 calendar days' notice to covered entities and other impacted stakeholders before implementation
    of a rebate model, with instructions for registering for any IT platforms.

  3. Plan should allow for covered entities to order the selected drugs under existing distribution mechanisms (e.g., 340B wholesaler accounts with pre-rebate prices loaded) to ensure purchases flow through existing infrastructure.

  4. Plan should provide a technical assistance/customer service component and ensure that opportunities to engage with the
    manufacturer in good faith regarding questions or concerns are made available to covered entities through both the IT platform
    and a point of contact at the manufacturer.

  5. Plan should ensure that the IT platform has assurances in place to ensure that the data is secure and protected and collection
    of the data is limited to the elements listed below that are necessary for providing 340B rebates pursuant to section 340B(a)(1)
    of the PHSA.

  6. Plan should ensure that the IT platform has mechanisms in place to protect patient identifying information, which is required
    to be maintained in a manner consistent with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and any other
    applicable privacy and data security laws.

Reporting Requirements

  1. Plan should ensure that covered entities are allowed to submit and report data (as detailed below) for up to 45 calendar
    days from date of dispense, with allowances for extenuating circumstances and other exceptions, including adjustments when
    a 340B status change occurs on a claim.

  2. Plan should ensure that the IT platform will have the capacity to receive data that will filter and use only the data required
    to effectuate the rebate (e.g., if drugs other than selected drugs under the MDPNP are submitted, the platform will be able to identify and discard unneeded
    data).

  3. Plan should ensure that the IT platform will have the capability to provide real-time reconciliation reports for covered
    entities to be informed of the rebate status of submitted claims.

  4. A manufacturer should agree to provide OPA with periodic reports consistent with the information outlined in this Notice,
    in a format and manner specified by OPA (instructions forthcoming). Such reports should detail data on purchases provided
    through rebates, information related to claim delays and denials, and other information that may evaluate the effectiveness
    of the rebate model.

Rebates

  1. Plan should specify if rebates are paid at the package level, or at the unit level.

  2. Plan should ensure that all rebates are paid to the covered entity (or denied, with documentation in support) within 10
    calendar days of data submission.

  3. Plan should ensure that 340B rebates are not denied based on compliance concerns with diversion or Medicaid duplicate
    discounts, pursuant to sections 340B(a)(5)(A) and (B) of the Public Health Service Act and should provide for rationale and
    specific documentation for reasons claims are denied (e.g., deduplication for MFP or 340B rebate provided to another covered entity on the same claim). If a manufacturer has concerns
    regarding diversion or Medicaid duplicate discounts, the manufacturer should raise those concerns directly with OPA or utilize
    the 340B statutory mechanisms, such as audits and administrative dispute resolution (ADR), for addressing such issues. Covered
    entities are also afforded opportunities to raise concerns with OPA if there are issues with rebate delays and denials, or
    any other administrative or logistical issues emerging through implementation of the rebate model.

  4. Plan should ensure that 340B rebates are only paid on sales of drugs selected under the MDPNP, regardless of payer.

Data

  1. All data requested as part of the Plan should be limited to only the following readily available pharmacy claim fields:

a. Date of Service

b. Date Prescribed

c. RX number

d. Fill Number

e. 11 Digit National Drug Code (NDC)

f. Quantity Dispensed

g. Prescriber ID

h. Service Provider ID

i. 340B ID

j. Rx Bank Identification Number (BIN)

k. Rx Processor Control Number (PCN)

Thomas J. Engels, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2025-14998 Filed 8-6-25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4165-15-P

Footnotes

(1) As stated in Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program: Revised Guidance, Implementation of Sections 1191-1198 of the Social
Security Act for Initial Price Applicability Year 2026, “in accordance with section 1193(d)(1) of the Social Security Act,
the Primary Manufacturer of a selected drug is not required to provide access to the Maximum Fair Price (MFP) for a selected
drug to MFP-eligible individuals who are eligible to be furnished, administered, or dispensed such selected drug at a covered
entity described in section 340B(a)(4) of the (Public Health Service (PHS)) Act if the selected drug is subject to an agreement
described in section 340B(a)(1) of the PHSA and the 340B ceiling price (defined in section 340B(a)(1) of the PHS Act is lower
than the MFP for such selected drug. Under section 1193(d)(2) of the Social Security Act, the Primary Manufacturer is required
to provide access to the MFP to 340B covered entities in a deduplicated amount to the 340B ceiling price if the MFP for the
selected drug is lower than the 340B ceiling price for the selected drug.”

(2) Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Selected Drug List, available at https://www.cms.gov/files/zip/medicare-drug-price-negotiation-selected-drug-list.zip.

(3) The Fact Sheet for Negotiated Prices for Applicability Year 2026 includes the list of Primary Manufacturers with selected
drugs, available at https://www.cms.gov/files/document/fact-sheet-negotiated-prices-initial-price-applicability-year-2026.pdf.

Download File

Download

Classification

Agency
Various Federal Agencies
Compliance deadline
September 8th, 2025 (188 days ago)
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Consultation
Change scope
Substantive

Who this affects

Applies to
Drug manufacturers Healthcare providers
Geographic scope
National (US)

Taxonomy

Primary area
Healthcare
Operational domain
Compliance
Topics
Pharmaceuticals Public Health

Get Healthcare Regulation alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Regs.gov: Health Resources and Services Administration publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.