GAO Report on Federal Real Property Funding Challenges
Summary
The GAO has released a report highlighting funding challenges for federal real property management, impacting capital projects, maintenance, and disposal efforts. The report identifies recommendations for Congress and agencies, including addressing underutilized space and exploring alternative budgetary structures.
What changed
This GAO report, GAO-26-109007, details significant funding uncertainties affecting federal real property management. It highlights how limitations on the Federal Buildings Fund, driven by congressional appropriations, hinder capital projects, exacerbate deferred maintenance backlogs (costing billions), and impede the consolidation and disposal of underutilized space, leading to hundreds of millions in potential losses. The report draws on previous GAO work and makes recommendations to the GSA and other federal agencies.
Agencies and Congress are advised to address challenges with underused federal space by improving utilization monitoring and disposal processes. The report also suggests exploring alternative budgetary structures for federal real property, such as modifying the Buildings Fund to accommodate major renovations or granting tenant agencies more management authority. These changes aim to enable more prudent fiscal decisions and improve the long-term management and cost-effectiveness of federal real estate holdings.
What to do next
- Review GAO recommendations for managing federal real property and underutilized space.
- Assess current capital project funding strategies in light of identified challenges.
- Evaluate maintenance backlogs and their potential cost implications.
Source document (simplified)
GAO-26-109007 Published: Mar 26, 2026. Publicly Released: Mar 26, 2026.
Fast Facts
We testified before the House Appropriation's Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government about the impacts of funding uncertainty on federal property.
It is based on many of our federal property management reports, including:
- Federal Real Property: Agencies Need New Benchmarks to Measure and Shed Underutilized Space
- Capital Financing: Alternative Approaches to Budgeting for Federal Real Property Additionally, it updates information we reported in our prior work.
We’ve made recommendations to the General Services Administration and other federal agencies related to this issue.
Highlights
What GAO Found
Many agencies rely on the General Services Administration (GSA) to manage facilities for them. The Federal Buildings Fund (Buildings Fund) was established for real property management and associated activities. GSA collects rent from tenant agencies; deposits it into the Buildings Fund; and uses that money for real property acquisition, operation, maintenance, and disposal. Through the appropriations process, Congress sets annual limits on how much of this funding GSA can obligate to various activities.
GAO’s work has highlighted the impact of uncertain funding on real property management:
- Capital projects. Obtaining upfront funding for large projects—such as constructing, purchasing, or renovating federal buildings—has been a challenge for federal agencies. Congressional spending limits require GSA to first use available funds to pay for other needs, including leasing, operations and maintenance, and debt costs, making funding for large capital projects less available and potentially costing more in the long run.
- Maintenance and repair. Agencies’ backlog of deferred maintenance and repairs has grown by billions of dollars in recent years due, in part, to funding constraints. Deferring maintenance can worsen the condition of agencies’ assets and lead to premature replacement, significantly increasing costs.
Consolidation and disposal. Federal agencies have struggled to determine how much space they need to fulfill their missions and identify the funding to consolidate operations, reconfigure spaces, and prepare unneeded property for disposal. Funding uncertainty can result in missed opportunities to eliminate leases and consolidate agencies into federally owned space, costing the federal government hundreds of millions of dollars.
GAO has identified actions Congress and federal agencies could take to better manage real property and address funding-related challenges. For example:Disposal of underused buildings.GAO recommended that the Office of Management and Budget and GSA take steps to address challenges with federally underused space, including assisting agencies in monitoring building utilization and reducing underutilized space.
Adopting alternative budgetary structures. GAO reported on different budgetary structures as options that could help Congress and agencies make more prudent fiscal decisions. For example, Congress could modify the Buildings Fund to exclude certain major renovations or grant tenant agencies the authority to manage buildings they occupy. GAO has identified issues Congress may wish to consider when granting additional budgetary authorities, including ensuring agencies have the necessary real property expertise.
Why GAO Did This Study
The federal government’s real property holdings are vast and diverse, costing billions annually to occupy, operate, and maintain. GAO designated federal real property as high risk in 2003 because of large amounts of underused property and the considerable difficulty agencies have faced in disposing of unneeded holdings. Historically, the Buildings Fund has not generated sufficient revenues to meet all real property needs.
This statement discusses: 1) the status of the Buildings Fund, 2) the impacts of funding uncertainty on federal real property management, and 3) some options to address funding challenges. This statement is primarily based on GAO’s prior work on the Buildings Fund and real property management, as well as updated information from GSA revenue and occupancy data, agency budget documents, GSA statements on its budget, and legislative proposals.
Recommendations
We have made a number of recommendations to federal agencies to improve the management of federal real property and use existing funding more effectively, including on property disposal and the management of deferred maintenance and repair. Federal agencies have taken actions to address some of these recommendations, but additional action is needed to fully implement others.
Full Report
GAO Contacts
David Marroni Director Physical Infrastructure marronid@gao.gov
Media Inquiries
Sarah Kaczmarek Managing Director Office of Public Affairs media@gao.gov
Public Inquiries
Topics
Named provisions
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Government & Legislation alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when GAO Reports publishes new changes.