Danish Competition Council Approves Apple Commitments on iPhone Repairs
Summary
The Danish Competition Council approved commitments from Apple resolving concerns that the company abused a dominant position by placing artificial barriers to iPhone repairs in Denmark. From 2018 to 2024, iPhones displayed 'unknown part' messages when repaired with non-Apple parts, preventing full functionality and disadvantaging independent repairers. Apple's commitments require the company not to introduce artificial barriers regardless of part origin or repairer, enable all parts to achieve full functionality, and display only objective repair messages. The Council has not made a final finding of infringement.
“Apple has offered commitments to the Danish Competition Council, which may make repairs of iPhones cheaper, and create more repair options.”
Technology companies with dominant positions in device markets should review their repair and parts policies against the standards applied here: artificial barriers that restrict third-party repair functionality or display punitive messages about non-original parts may attract scrutiny under both national and EU competition law. Companies whose business models depend on exclusive repair networks should assess whether their technical measures to restrict independent repairs could constitute abuse of dominant position.
About this source
GovPing monitors Denmark Konkurrence News for new government & legislation regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 3 changes logged to date.
What changed
The Danish Competition Council accepted binding commitments from Apple following an investigation into whether Apple abused its dominant position in the iPhone repair market in Denmark between 2018 and 2024. Apple's commitments require it not to introduce artificial barriers to the repair process regardless of which repairer performs the work or whether new, used, original, or non-original parts are used, to enable all parts to achieve full functionality, and to display only objective, factual, and non-discriminatory repair messages on iPhones.
Affected parties include Apple, which is now bound by these commitments with penalties for breach, as well as independent and unauthorized repairers who previously lacked access to Apple's software and were unable to perform full repairs. Consumers and businesses using iPhones in Denmark may benefit from lower repair prices and more repair options. The decision demonstrates that national competition authorities can act against large international companies on market-specific concerns, particularly where device penetration differs from other European markets.
Archived snapshot
Apr 28, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
News
- December 2025
The Competition Council intervenes against Apple
Apple has offered commitments to the Danish Competition Council, which may make repairs of iPhones cheaper, and create more repair options. Among other things, Apple commits not to introduce artificial barriers to the repair process of iPhones in Denmark.
The Chair of the Danish Competition Council, Christian Schultz, states:
We assess that Apple’s commitments will have significant impact on competition for the repair of iPhones in Denmark. For consumers and for businesses whose employees use iPhones, repair prices may be lower than otherwise, and they may have more options if the iPhones does now work as it should. At the same time, the commitments create new business opportunities or the group of repairers who are not currently affiliated with Apple.
Our preliminary assessment is that Apple’s conduct may have enabled Apple to set higher prices for Apple spare parts for iPhones. At the same time, Apple’s conduct may have influenced end customers to buy new iPhones instead of repairing old ones, and may have prevented repairers not affiliated with Apple from repairing iPhones to full functionality.
The Danish Competition Council has approved commitments from Apple. The commitments resolve the Danish Competition and Consumer Authority’s concerns that Apple may have abused a dominant position by placing barriers to the repair process of iPhones.
When repairers had repaired the screen, battery or cameras on an iPhone without using Apple’s new spare parts and software, certain functions on the phone did not work, and the phone displayed a message stating that an unknown part had been used.
With Apple’s commitments, all repairers will be able to repair iPhones, without Apple introducing artificial barriers to the repair process.
The commitments entail that Apple:
- Undertakes not to introduce artificial barriers to the repair process, regardless of whether new, used, original or non-original parts are used, and regardless of which repairer carries out the repair.
- Will enable parts to achieve the full functionality that the part allows. This applies regardless of who the repairer is, and whether the part is original, non-original, new or used.
- Undertakes to display only objective, factual and non-discriminatory repair messages on the iPhone after a repair. Apple’s commitments strengthen repairers’ access to repairing iPhones in the Danish market. This may lead to lower repair prices and increase consumer choice. It may also become more advantageous to repair an iPhone instead of buying a new one. The Danish Competition Council has not adopted a decision finding that Apple has infringed the competition rules.
It is often the EU competition authority that pursues competition cases against tech giants such as Apple. There is, however, nothing to prevent a national competition authority from bringing a case concerning an infringement of the competition rules against a large international company. In this case, among other things, it has been relevant that iPhones are generally more widespread in Denmark than in other European countries.
For further information
Contact the Head of Communications at the Danish Competition and Consumer Authority, Hanne Arentoft, on +45 41 71 50 98.
Links
Read summary of the decision (in English)
Press photo of the chairman of the Danish Competition Council Christian Schultz
Repairs of iPhones
At least in the period 2018 to 2024, the following applied to repairs of iPhones:
- If an iPhone’s part was defective, there could be a need to replace a part.
- Parts such as the screen, battery, and front and rear cameras had to be verified, paired and calibrated. If this did not happen, certain functions would not work, and a message would appear stating that an “unknown part” had been used.
- The verification process required that the repairer had access to Apple’s software and that a new original part had been used.
- Not all repairers had access to Apple’s software and new original parts.
Repairers of iPhones in Denmark
In the period 2018–2024, repairers of iPhones in Denmark could be divided into three types:
- Apple Authorized Service Providers repairers: These repairers were obliged to use only Apple’s software and new original parts for all iPhone repairs. They performed both in-warranty repairs and out-of-warranty repairs.
- Independent Service Providers: These repairers had access to Apple’s software and new original parts, but were not obliged to use them exclusively. They typically offered both repairs with parts from Apple and repairs with parts from suppliers other than Apple. They performed only out-of-warranty repairs.
- Unauthorized repairers: These repairers were not part of any of Apple’s repair programs, and for most of the period they did not have access to Apple’s software and new original parts. They offered only repairs using parts from suppliers other than Apple, and they performed only out-of-warranty repairs.
Commitments in competition cases
- If the Danish Competition Council can establish that a company infringes the competition rules, the Council may intervene by issuing an order.
- Alternatively, the company may seek to find a solution by offering commitments that resolve the Danish Competition Council’s concerns. In the Apple case, the Danish Competition Council does not make a final assessment of whether the competition rules have been infringed.
- The company drafts its own commitments, while the Danish Competition Council makes them binding in its decision.
- Commitments oblige the company to act or to refrain from acting in a particular way.
- Commitments are binding on the company, and breaching them is subject to penalties.
- A commitments decision may have the same effect on a market as an order, as the company removes potentially anti-competitive conduct that may harm consumers, businesses and the wider economy.
Parties
Related changes
Get daily alerts for Denmark Konkurrence News
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from KFST.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Denmark Konkurrence News publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.