Insurance Companies Consider Climate Change Risks and Costs
Summary
The Utah Insurance Department Commissioner Jon Pike stated that insurance companies are considering climate change risks, such as wildfires, when making business decisions about writing homeowners insurance policies. While some companies have withdrawn from high-risk areas in other states, no companies have yet pulled out of Utah, though some have expressed concerns about specific counties.
What changed
Utah Insurance Commissioner Jon Pike has indicated that insurance companies are increasingly factoring climate change risks, including wildfires and floods, into their business decisions regarding homeowners insurance policies. This consideration is leading some large carriers in other states, like California, to limit or halt new policy writing. While no companies have yet withdrawn from Utah, some have expressed concerns about specific counties, suggesting a potential for future market adjustments.
The implications for Utah are that while homeowners insurance is currently available at competitive prices, the situation is developing. Insurers are also evaluating state and community mitigation efforts, such as controlled burns, as part of their risk assessment. Regulated entities, particularly insurers operating in Utah, should monitor these trends and the effectiveness of local mitigation strategies, as they may influence future underwriting decisions and policy availability.
What to do next
- Monitor insurance market trends in Utah regarding climate change risk assessment.
- Review state and local mitigation efforts for climate-related risks (e.g., wildfires).
Source document (simplified)
Insurance companies eyeing climate change when considering risks, costs
Jul 11, 2023, 6:00 AM
(TW Peterson)
(TW Peterson)
Host, Utah's Morning News
SALT LAKE CITY — Climate change has been so politicized as a topic. Even meteorologists have recommended calling it “extreme weather” instead of climate change to try to avoid politics. But for insurance companies, climate change is not political.
“When you’re talking about insurance, and especially when you’re getting into homeowners insurance, insurance companies have to think about all risks,” said Jon Pike, commissioner of the Utah Insurance Department. “Wildfires, earthquakes and floods, they could all be affected by weather patterns.”
Pike is familiar with the challenges of word choice.
“Whether it’s climate change, trends in climate or whether it’s cyclical, it’s up to the insurance companies to determine what they should look at.”
It’s a business decision
Insurance companies look at climate change as part of a business decision. Can we afford to cover homes in this area?
“Some large carriers in California, like Allstate and State Farm, have said, ‘We’re going to keep the business we have, but we’re not going to write new homeowners insurance policies’,” Pike explained.
Insurance companies have to consider all the risks before they decide whether to write a policy.
Have any companies pulled out of Utah?
“Not yet,” Pike answered. “I will say there are a few that are having some similar concerns.”
The insurance companies that have expressed concerns have said something like, “Well, we may not write new business in Summit County, for example.”
Pike can’t point to a specific insurance company that might pull out of Utah because “it’s still developing, but you can see why there are some concerns.”
A company may decide that its market share is a little too high in a wildfire area.
“[The company might say] ‘Nothing against Utah. Nothing against a particular county, but maybe we should pull back a little bit’,” Pike said.
All in all, the commissioner was clear.
“Right now, we don’t have a problem that I’m aware of anywhere in Utah where we can’t get homeowners insurance and at competitive prices.”
It’s a team effort
When an insurance company looks at insuring homes and businesses in an area, it doesn’t just look at the climate-related risks, like wildfire. It looks at what the state and community are doing to mitigate those risks.
Public policy matters.
“I’m pleased that the legislature has been looking into these issues for the last several years, actually,” Pike explained.
Legislators are talking with the Department of Natural Resources, with fire chiefs, with the leaders of cities and counties, to find out what we should be learning more about and what mitigation efforts we should be taking.
One example of this is prescribed burning. Several counties in Utah conducted controlled burns this year as a tool to reduce hazardous fuels, which can lead to more wildfires.
“We love to be able to point (insurance companies) to that kind of efforts to say, ‘See what we’re doing in our state and these counties. See the kinds of efforts to be proactive and preventive in terms of wildfire’,” Pike elaborated.
“One size misfits all”
Regulating insurance is up to the states.
“I believe there is good reason for that,” Pike said. “There is a quote used in local government — one size misfits all.”
Pike attributed that quote to Cameron Diehl, Executive Director of the Utah League of Cities and Towns.
“The risks Utah might have are very different from the risks of New York or California, Idaho, or Puerto Rico.”
We want to hear from you.
Have a story idea or tip? Send it to the KSL NewsRadio team here.
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Government General alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when UT Insurance News publishes new changes.