Changeflow GovPing Government General Oregon Leads Multistate Lawsuit Against Trump A...
Priority review Enforcement Added Final

Oregon Leads Multistate Lawsuit Against Trump Administration Over Tariffs

Favicon for www.doj.state.or.us AG: Oregon Media Releases
Filed March 5th, 2026
Detected March 18th, 2026
Email

Summary

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield led 23 states in a lawsuit challenging President Trump's recent tariffs imposed without congressional approval. The lawsuit argues these tariffs unlawfully increase prices on American consumers and businesses, citing Federal Reserve analysis and estimated impacts on Oregon families.

What changed

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, joined by 23 other states, has filed a lawsuit challenging President Trump's latest round of tariffs. The suit, filed on March 5, 2026, contends that these tariffs, imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, are illegal because they were enacted without congressional approval and do not meet the criteria for balance-of-payment deficits. This action follows a Supreme Court ruling that rejected the administration's prior use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act for similar tariff impositions.

The practical implications of this lawsuit are significant for businesses involved in international trade and for consumers. The tariffs are alleged to increase the cost of essential goods, with an estimated annual impact of over $1200 per family in Oregon. Businesses, particularly small businesses relying on imports, face increased operational costs and instability. While no specific compliance deadline is mentioned, the lawsuit aims to block these tariffs, potentially leading to a rollback of recent price increases if successful. The legal challenge highlights the administration's ongoing disputes over trade policy and executive authority.

What to do next

  1. Review current import costs and supply chain impacts related to recent tariffs.
  2. Monitor legal developments in the multi-state lawsuit challenging the tariffs.
  3. Assess potential price adjustments for consumers based on ongoing trade policy litigation.

Source document (simplified)

News & Media Releases

- Media Releases

  • #### Search by Keyword
  • #### Filter by News Category

OCPA Privacy Law Hate and Bias Crimes Voting and Elections
- #### View Prior News

  • From:

- To:

Attorney General Dan Rayfield Sues Trump Administration to Stop Latest Round of Illegal Tariffs

March 5, 2026 • Posted in Homepage, Lawsuits and Letters, Media Release

Oregon Leads Case to Block Tariffs that are Increasing Prices on American Consumers and Businesses

Attorney General Dan Rayfield led a coalition of 23 other states in filing a lawsuit to block President Trump’s latest efforts to impose illegal tariffs on American consumers and businesses. The case challenges President Trump’s most recent attempt to increase tariffs worldwide without congressional approval.

“The focus right now should be on paying people back, not doubling down on illegal tariffs,” said Attorney General Rayfield. “People are already making hard choices about what to put in their shopping cart. Prices on basics like groceries, clothing and other essentials have all been skyrocketing. At some point, the bills become unmanageable.”

For more than a year, President Trump has inflicted chaos on the American economy by imposing tariffs without the legal authority to do so. Initially, the President claimed that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) allowed him to impose tariffs of any amount, on any product, from any country, for any length of time. Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court rejected that argument, concluding that the IEEPA tariffs were unlawful.

Rather than accepting that loss in court, President Trump immediately turned to a separate law that has never been used before—Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974—and announced 15 percent tariffs on most products worldwide, seemingly to address trade deficits. But Section 122 does not apply. That law authorizes tariffs in limited circumstances, including when there are “large and serious balance-of-payments deficits.” Notably, a trade deficit is not a balance-of-payment deficit, meaning that once again the President is acting unlawfully.

A recent analysis » by researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York concluded that nearly 90 percent of the costs of tariffs in 2025 were paid by American consumers and businesses. By imposing another round of price increases on American consumers and businesses, President Trump is doubling down on failed economic policies.

Experts also estimate that in Oregon », the tariffs will raise the cost of living for the average family by more than $1200 a year. This essentially imposes a sales tax on citizens of the state, something that Oregonians have voted down for years.

In 2025, Oregon companies imported more than $28 billion in parts and products ». Small businesses in Oregon rely on imports, and stability in trade policy is crucial for these businesses to survive. When prices go up for the businesses, those costs are passed down to consumers.

“Tariffs create real and immediate pressure for small manufacturers like ours,” said George Domurot, founder and CEO of Ranger Chocolate. “Many of the core ingredients we rely on – including cacao – simply cannot be grown in the United States. When trade policy becomes unpredictable, it directly impacts our cost structure, pricing stability, and long-term planning.”

Today’s lawsuit challenges this latest round of tariffs. The complaint contends that these actions by President Trump and his administration violate the law, upend constitutional separation of powers, and violate the Administrative Procedure Act.

The case is entitled State of Oregon, et al., v. Trump, et al. and will be filed today in the U.S. Court of International Trade.

The case is led by Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes, California Attorney General Rob Bonta, and New York Attorney General Letitia James. Also joining the lawsuit are the attorneys general of Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, and the Governors of Kentucky and Pennsylvania.

Share Share Share Email Print

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
GP
Filed
March 5th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive

Who this affects

Applies to
Consumers Importers and exporters Retailers
Geographic scope
National (US)

Taxonomy

Primary area
International Trade
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Consumer Protection Antitrust & Competition

Get Government General alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when AG: Oregon Media Releases publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.