Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

WDWA Opinions

RSS
14d ago WDWA Opinions
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Danielle V. v. Commissioner of Social Security - Order Reversing Denial of Benefits

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington issued an order reversing and remanding the Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits to Danielle V. The case, docketed as 3:25-cv-05104, involves judicial review of the administrative law judge's decision.

Priority review Enforcement Pensions & Retirement
15d ago WDWA Opinions
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Leader Capital Corp v. FNEX Capital LLC - Court Order

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington issued an order in the case of Leader Capital Corp v. FNEX Capital LLC. The order addresses motions to dismiss filed by both the plaintiff and defendants concerning claims related to a sales agreement for mutual fund products.

Routine Enforcement Securities
15d ago WDWA Opinions
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

John Rapp v. Naphcare, Inc. - Minor Settlement Approval

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington approved a minor settlement in the case of John Rapp v. Naphcare, Inc. The court reviewed stipulated orders, motions, and a settlement guardian ad litem report before entering its order.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
15d ago WDWA Opinions
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

John Rapp Estate v. Naphcare, Inc. - Settlement and Dismissal

The District Court for the Western District of Washington has issued a stipulated motion to approve a settlement and dismissal order in the case of John Rapp Estate v. Naphcare, Inc. The case involves multiple plaintiffs and defendants, including Naphcare, Inc. and Kitsap County. The court's order signifies the resolution of the legal dispute.

Priority review Enforcement Healthcare
16d ago WDWA Opinions
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Lady Dan'Di'Le'on v. All Public and Private Entities - Court Opinion

The District Court for the Western District of Washington denied a pro se plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order in the case Lady Dan'Di'Le'on v. All Public and Private Entities. The court found the motion insufficient even under a liberal construction standard.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
16d ago WDWA Opinions
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Pearson v. Sysco Food Distribution - Order Granting Motion to Dismiss

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted a motion to dismiss the case of Pearson v. Sysco Food Distribution. The plaintiff failed to state a claim, name the correct legal entity, and timely serve the defendants.

Routine Enforcement Employment & Labor
16d ago WDWA Opinions
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

JLJ Productions LLC v. Amazon.com Services LLC - Motion to Dismiss Ruling

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington issued an order in the case JLJ Productions LLC v. Amazon.com Services LLC. The court granted in part and denied in part Amazon's motion to dismiss JLJ's amended complaint regarding an alleged breach of a sponsorship agreement.

Routine Enforcement Corporate Governance
16d ago WDWA Opinions
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Stephen H. Smith v. Ascension Acquisition LLC et al. - Order Denying Motion for Summary Judgment

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington denied Plaintiff Stephen H. Smith's motion for summary judgment in the case of Smith v. Ascension Acquisition LLC et al. The order addresses claims related to breach of contract and unjust enrichment stemming from business agreements concerning a recovery center facility.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
16d ago WDWA Opinions
Favicon for www.courtlistener.com

Harrington v. Vineyard Vines LLC - Motion for Reconsideration Denied

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington denied Vineyard Vines LLC's motion for reconsideration in the case Harrington v. Vineyard Vines LLC. The court found that the defendant's arguments regarding federal preemption were not properly raised and lacked merit.

Routine Enforcement Consumer Protection

Get WDWA Opinions alerts

We'll email you when WDWA Opinions publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.