Changeflow GovPing Environment Pravash Kar Mahapatra vs Ministry of Environmen...
Routine Enforcement Amended Final

Pravash Kar Mahapatra vs Ministry of Environment - Environmental Application

Favicon for indiankanoon.org India National Green Tribunal
Filed March 11th, 2026
Detected March 28th, 2026
Email

Summary

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has adjourned the environmental application filed by Pravash Kar Mahapatra against the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. The adjournment is sine die, pending the decision of a related Civil Appeal No. 2480/2023 before the Supreme Court of India.

What changed

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has adjourned Original Application No. 54/2023/EZ, filed by Pravash Kar Mahapatra, sine die. This action was taken because a related matter, Civil Appeal No. 2480/2023 (Poultry Farmers and Breeding Association Vs. Union of India & Ors.), involving the same core issue, is currently pending before the Supreme Court of India. The NGT acknowledged that the Supreme Court's decision will materially impact the outcome of this application.

Parties involved in this application should be aware that the proceedings are now on hold indefinitely. While no immediate action is required, any party can petition the NGT to revive the application once the Supreme Court has rendered its decision. This adjournment avoids further unproductive hearings while awaiting a higher court's ruling, with no prejudice to the parties.

What to do next

  1. Monitor the outcome of Civil Appeal No. 2480/2023 before the Supreme Court of India.
  2. Consider moving the NGT for revival of the application after the Supreme Court's decision.

Source document (simplified)

Select the following parts of the judgment
| Issues | Precedent Analysis |
| Court's Reasoning | Conclusion |
For entire doc: Unmark Mark View how precedents are cited in this document View precedents: Unmark Mark View only precedents: Unmark Mark Select precedent ... Filter precedents by opinion of the court
| Accepted by Court |

## Unlock Advanced Research with PRISM AI

Integrated with over 4 crore judgments and laws — designed for legal practitioners, researchers, students and institutions

Pravash Kar Mahapatra vs Ministry Of Environment Forest And ... on 11 March, 2026

Item No.11 Court No.1

           BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL
              EASTERN ZONE BENCH, KOLKATA
         (THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING WITH HYBRID MODE)

                 Original Application No.54/2023/EZ

Pravash Kar Mahapatra Applicant

                               Versus

MoEF&CC & Ors. Respondents

Date of hearing: 11.03.2026
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR TYAGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
HON'BLE DR. A. SENTHIL VEL, EXPERT MEMBER

Applicant: Ms. Sravani Sahoo, proxy Counsel for Mr. Sidhartha Mishra,
Advocate for the applicant (through VC).

Respondents: Ms. Amrita Pandey, Advocate for respondent no.1 (through VC).
Mr. Dipanjan Ghosh, Advocate for respondents no.3 and 4
(through VC).
Mr. Surendra Kumar, Advocate for respondent no.6 (through VC).
Mr. Ashok Prasad, Advocate for respondent no.7 (through VC).
Mr. Pran Gopal Das and Ms. Kaniz Kulsum, Advocates for
respondent no.8 (through VC).
None for respondents no.2 and 5.

                            ORDER 1.    The applicant filed present application under Section 18 (1) read

with Section 14(1) and 15(1) of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.

  1. Vide order dated 18.05.2023, notices were issued to the

respondents.

  1. Pursuant thereto, replies/reports were filed by the respondents

which have been taken on record.

  1. In the course of hearing, it was pointed out that [Civil Appeal

No.2480/2023 the Poultry Farmers and Breeding Association Vs. Union of

India & Ors.](https://indiankanoon.org/doc/121919953/) involving the same issue as involved in the present Original

Application is pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.

  1. Learned Counsels for the parties have conceded that the decision

of the abovesaid Civil Appeal will have material bearing on the decision of

the present Original Application.

  1. This Tribunal has already adjourned the case for more than eleven

dates in view of the pendency of the above said Civil Appeal.

  1. Disposal of the above said Civil Appeal is likely to take some time.

No useful purpose will be served by repeatedly adjourning the matter

during pendency of the abovesaid Civil Appeal. No prejudice will be

caused to the parties if the present Original Application is adjourned sine

die as any of the parties may move this Tribunal for revival thereof.

  1. Accordingly, the present Original Application is adjourned sine die

with liberty that any of the parties may move this Tribunal for revival

thereof after decision of the abovesaid Civil Appeal by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court of India.

  1. Appropriate entry be made in the record that the abovementioned

Original Application has been adjourned sine die and will be revived for

further hearing after decision of the abovesaid Civil Appeal by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court of India.

Arun Kumar Tyagi, JM

                                                  Dr. A Senthil Vel, EM

March 11th, 2026
Original Application No.54/2023/EZ
SN

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
NGT
Filed
March 11th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
Original Application No.54/2023/EZ
Docket
54/2023/EZ

Who this affects

Activity scope
Environmental Litigation
Geographic scope
IN IN

Taxonomy

Primary area
Environmental Protection
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Litigation Environmental Law

Get Environment alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when India National Green Tribunal publishes new changes.

Optional. Personalizes your daily digest.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.