Changeflow GovPing Energy PHMSA Proposes Higher OPID Notification Thresho...
Priority review Consultation Amended Proposed

PHMSA Proposes Higher OPID Notification Threshold for Pipeline Construction

Email

Summary

PHMSA proposes to increase the cost threshold that triggers mandatory Operator Identification Number (OPID) notification requirements for pipeline construction projects. Under the amendment, fewer pipeline operators would be required to submit notifications before beginning construction, reducing administrative burden for projects below the new threshold. The proposed rule affects operators of natural gas pipelines under 49 CFR 191 and hazardous liquid pipelines under 49 CFR 195. Comments are due June 23, 2026.

“This document has a comment period that ends in 60 days. (06/23/2026)”

Why this matters

Pipeline operators subject to 49 CFR 191 and 49 CFR 195 should assess their construction project pipeline against the proposed threshold before the June 23, 2026 comment close date. Projects that would fall below the new threshold if adopted could be newly exempt from OPID notification requirements, reducing pre-construction administrative steps. Operators who support the threshold increase may benefit from submitting comments with supporting cost data.

AI-drafted from the source document, validated against GovPing's analyst note standards . For the primary regulatory language, read the source document .
Published by Transportation Department on federalregister.gov . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors PHMSA Pipeline Safety (Federal Register) for new energy regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 15 changes logged to date.

What changed

PHMSA proposes amending 49 CFR 191.29 and 49 CFR 195.64 to increase the cost threshold that triggers mandatory Operator Identification Number (OPID) notification requirements before pipeline construction. The adjustment raises the threshold above which operators must notify PHMSA before beginning covered construction projects.\n\nPipeline operators of natural gas and hazardous liquid pipelines should review their upcoming construction projects against the proposed new threshold to determine whether OPID notifications would be required. Operators with projects previously above the notification threshold may find those projects now exempt under the proposed change, reducing administrative requirements. PHMSA is accepting public comments through the Regulations.gov docket PHMSA-2026-1551.

Archived snapshot

Apr 24, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Legal Status This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.

The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.

The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.

Legal Status

Proposed Rule

Pipeline Safety: Adjustment to OPID Notifications for Construction

A Proposed Rule by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration on 04/24/2026

  • 1.

1.
This document has a comment period that ends in 60 days.
(06/23/2026) Submit a public comment

Thank you for taking the time to create a comment. Your input is important.

Once you have filled in the required fields below you can preview and/or submit your comment to the Transportation Department for review. All comments are considered public and will be posted online once the Transportation Department has reviewed them.

You can view or you may also comment via Regulations.gov at https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/PHMSA-2026-1551-0002.

It appears that you have attempted to comment on this document before
so we've restored your progress.
.
1.
2. Comment * What is your comment about? Upload File(s) Note: You can attach your comment as a file and/or attach supporting
documents to your comment. Attachment Requirements.

Email this will NOT be posted on regulations.gov

Opt to receive email confirmation of submission and tracking number? Tell us about yourself! I am... * An Individual An Organization Anonymous First Name * Last Name * City Region State Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Guam Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virgin Islands Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Zip Country Afghanistan Åland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Phone Organization Type * Company Organization Federal State Local Tribal Regional Foreign U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate Organization Name * You are filing a document into an official docket. Any personal
information included in your comment text and/or uploaded
attachment(s)
may be publicly viewable on the web. I read and understand the statement above.

  1. Please review the Regulations.gov privacy notice and user notice.
  2. Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agencies Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Agency/Docket Number Docket No. PHMSA-2026-1551 CFR 49 CFR 191 49 CFR 195 Document Citation 91 FR 22091 Document Number 2026-08082 Document Type Proposed Rule Pages 22091-22096 (6 pages) Publication Date 04/24/2026 RIN 2137-AG55 Published Content - Document Details

Enhanced Content - Public Comments
- Regulations.gov Data Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data

FederalRegister.gov retrieves relevant information about this document
from Regulations.gov to provide users with additional context. This
information is not part of the official Federal Register document.

Pipeline Safety: Adjustment to OPID Notifications for Construction

Comment Due Date 06/23/2026 Docket ID PHMSA-2026-1551 Supporting Documents PRIA: OPID Construction Notifications Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data

- Sharing Enhanced Content - Sharing Shorter Document URL https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2026-08082 Email Email this document to a friend Enhanced Content - Sharing

  • Print Enhanced Content - Print
    • Enhanced Content - Print
  • Other Formats Enhanced Content - Other Formats This document is also available in the following formats:

JSON Normalized attributes and metadata XML Original full text XML MODS Government Publishing Office metadata More information and documentation can be found in our developer tools pages.

Enhanced Content - Other Formats
- Public Inspection Public Inspection This PDF is FR Doc. 2026-08082 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
04/23/2026 at 8:45 am.

It was viewed
16
times while on Public Inspection.

If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.

Public Inspection
Published Document: 2026-08082 (91 FR 22091) This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain
the following:

  1. the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
  2. the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to
  3. the agency docket number / agency internal file number
  4. the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.
Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
  1. 49 CFR Parts 191 and 195
  2. [Docket No. PHMSA-2026-1551]
  3. RIN 2137-AG55

AGENCY:

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION:

Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY:

This NPRM proposes to increase the monetary threshold for Operator Identification Number notifications for certain construction and maintenance tasks on gas and hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide pipeline facilities. PHMSA is also proposing to adjust inflation adjustment procedures to provide a mechanism for updating these thresholds on an annual basis.

DATES:

Comments must be received on or before June 23, 2026.

ADDRESSES:

You may submit comments identified by the Docket Number PHMSA-2026-1551 using any of the following methods:

E-Gov Web: https://www.regulations.gov. This site allows the public to enter comments on any Federal Register notice issued by any agency. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.

Mail: Docket Management System: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.

Hand Delivery: U.S. DOT Docket Management System: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Fax: 1-202-493-2251.

For commenting instructions and additional information about commenting, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sayler Palabrica, Transportation Specialist, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, 202-281-5413, sayler.palabrica@dot.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Discussion

Through this NPRM, PHMSA is proposing to revise §§ 191.22(c) and 195.64(c) to update to $20 million the monetary threshold triggering an operator notification to PHMSA when the operator performs certain construction activities on natural gas and hazardous liquid pipeline facilities, and update to $300,000 or more the monetary threshold triggering an operator notification to PHMSA when the operator performs certain maintenance tasks on underground natural gas storage facilities (UNGSF). PHMSA is also proposing in this NPRM to revise the property damage threshold inflation-indexing formula in Appendix A to Part 191 to broaden it and include inflation adjustments for these construction and maintenance activity notification thresholds.

Sections 191.22(c) and 195.64(c) currently require operators to notify PHMSA for “[c]onstruction or any planned rehabilitation, replacement, modification, upgrade, uprate, or update of a facility, other than a section of line pipe, that costs $10 million or more.” Section 191.22(c) also requires operators to notify PHMSA for “[m]aintenance of a UNGSF that involves the plugging or abandonment of a well, or that requires a workover rig and costs $200,000 or more for an individual well, including its wellhead.”

In response to DOT's request for information (90 FR 14593 (April 3, 2025)), the American Gas Association (AGA) and American Public Gas Association (APGA) requested that PHMSA update § 191.22(c) to account for inflation, stating that “construction costs have increased to the point that a minor regulating station upgrade in a high cost area such as [New York City] could easily result in costs that exceed the $10 million threshold.” ]

( printed page 22092) PHMSA agrees with AGA and APGA and is proposing to increase the base threshold amount for both notifications. Since construction notification requirements were put into place for pipelines in 2010 and for UNGSFs in 2020, inflation indexes associated with construction have increased sharply. The Producer Price Index (PPI) for construction materials has risen by 74 percent since 2010 and by 37 percent since 2020; the PPI for new nonresidential build construction has risen by 83 percent since 2010 and by 40 percent since 2020; the National Highway Construction Cost Index (NHCCI) has risen by 124 percent since 2010 and by 65 percent since 2020; and the Mortensen Construction Cost Index has increased by 105 percent since 2010 and by 43 percent since 2020. ]

In response, PHMSA is proposing to increase the threshold for construction notifications to $20 million for pipeline construction notifications and $300,000 for UNGS construction notifications. In addition, PHMSA proposes to update the inflation adjustment methodology in Appendix A to Part 191 for updating these monetary thresholds on an annual basis based on published changes in the average annual PPI for construction materials for the most recent complete calendar year. Each year after calendar year 2026, the Administrator will publish a notice on PHMSA's website announcing the updates to the incident reporting and OPID construction notification property damage threshold criteria that will take effect on July 1 of that year and will remain in effect until the June 30 of the next year. This process is identical to the existing procedure for determining the incident reporting definition, albeit it references the PPI for construction materials rather than the CPI for all urban consumers. PHMSA, in a parallel action titled “Pipeline Safety: Property Damage Definition for Incident Reporting on Gas Pipelines and Accidents on Hazardous Liquid Pipelines,” is proposing to adopt a new Appendix D to Part 195 that mirrors the inflation adjustment procedures of Appendix A in Part 191. PHMSA repeats the proposed Appendix D language in both NPRMs. See Docket No. PHMSA-2025-0109, RIN 2137-AF78 for more information and analysis on the proposal to adopt an inflation adjustment to the property damage threshold criteria for accident reporting and National Response Center notification in subpart B to Part 195.

PHMSA does not expect that the proposed revisions would have any adverse effect on pipeline safety. In addition, the methodology for calculating the property damage criterion for incident reporting would remain unchanged.

Commenting Instructions: Please include the docket number PHMSA-2026-1551 at the beginning of your comments. If you submit your comments by mail, submit two copies. If you wish to receive confirmation that PHMSA received your comments, include a self-addressed stamped postcard. Internet users may submit comments at https://www.regulations.gov.

Note:

Comments are posted without changes or edits to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. There is a privacy statement published on https://www.regulations.gov.

Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to https://www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.dot.gov/​privacy.

Confidential Business Information: Confidential Business Information (CBI) is commercial or financial information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public disclosure. It is important that you clearly designate the comments submitted as CBI if: your comments responsive to this document contain commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as private; you actually treat such information as private; and your comment is relevant or responsive to this notice. Pursuant to 49 CFR 190.343, you may ask PHMSA to provide confidential treatment to information you give to the agency by taking the following steps: (1) mark each page of the original document submission containing CBI as “Confidential;” (2) send PHMSA, along with the original document, a second copy of the original document with the CBI deleted; and (3) explain why the information that you are submitting is CBI. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Sayler Palabrica, Office of Pipeline Safety Standards and Rulemaking Division, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), 2nd Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, or by email at sayler.palabrica@dot.gov. Any materials PHMSA receives that is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket.

Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for accessing the docket. Alternatively, you may review the documents in person at the street address listed above.

II. Regulatory Analysis and Notices

A. Legal Authority

This proposed rule is published under the authority of the Secretary of Transportation set forth in the Federal Pipeline Safety Laws (49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.) and delegated to the PHMSA Administrator pursuant to 49 CFR 1.97.

B. Statutory Requirement and Executive Order 12866

The Federal Pipeline Safety Laws (49 U.S.C. 60102(b)) require that PHMSA prepare a risk assessment that identifies the costs and benefits associated with a proposed regulatory change. E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as implemented by DOT Order 2100.6B (“Policies and Procedures for Rulemaking”) and DOT Order 2100.7 (“Ensuring Reliance upon Sound Economic Analysis in Department of Transportation Policies, Programs, and Activities”), requires agencies to regulate in the “most cost-effective manner,” to make a “reasoned determination that the benefits of the intended regulation justify its costs,” and to develop regulations that “impose the least burden on society.” In arriving at those conclusions, E.O. 12866 requires that agencies should consider “both quantifiable measures . . . and qualitative measures of costs and benefits that are difficult to quantify” and “maximize net benefits . . . unless a statute requires another regulatory approach.” E.O. 12866 also requires that “agencies should assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives, including the alternative of ( printed page 22093) not regulating.” DOT Order 2100.6B directs that PHMSA and other Operating Administrations must generally choose the “least costly regulatory alternative that achieves the relevant objectives” unless required by law or compelling safety need. DOT Order 2100.6B also specifies that regulations should generally “not be issued unless their benefits are expected to exceed their costs” unless required by law or compelling safety need. DOT Order 2100.7 requires that “all rulemaking activities shall be based on sound economic principles and analysis supported by rigorous cost-benefit requirement.”

E.O. 12866 and DOT Order 2100.6B also require that PHMSA submit “significant regulatory actions” to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within the Executive Office of the President's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. This proposed rule is a not significant regulatory action pursuant to E.O. 12866; OMB also has not designated this rule as a “major rule” as defined by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.).

PHMSA has complied with the procedural and analytical requirements in E.O. 12866 as implemented by DOT Order 2100.6B and DOT Order 2100.7, as well as the requirements in 49 U.S.C. 60102(b), and preliminarily determined that this proposed rule will result in cost savings by reducing regulatory burdens for gas and hazardous liquid pipeline facility operators by reducing the number of notifications operators are required to submit. The accompanying Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis will provide detailed estimates of the potential costs savings to operators from reduced notification requirements. PHMSA estimates that the proposed rule would result in approximately $21,005 in cost savings annually. PHMSA expects these cost savings may also result in reduced costs for the public to whom pipeline operators generally transfer a portion of their compliance costs. PHMSA also preliminarily determined that the proposed rule would not have any adverse effects on safety, as it only adjusts reporting requirements to keep up with inflation.

C. Executive Orders 14192 and 14219

This proposed rule, if finalized as proposed, is expected to be a deregulatory action pursuant to E.O. 14192, Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation. PHMSA estimates that the total costs of the NPRM on the regulated community will be less than zero. Nor does this rulemaking implicate any of the factors identified in section 2(a) of E.O. 14219, Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's “Department of Government Efficiency” Deregulatory Initiative, indicative that a regulation is “unlawful . . . [or] that undermine[s] the national interest.”

D. Energy-Related Executive Orders 13211, 14154, and 14156

The President has declared in E.O. 14156, Declaring a National Energy Emergency, a national emergency to address America's inadequate energy development production, transportation, refining, and generation capacity. Similarly, E.O. 14154, Unleashing American Energy, asserts a Federal policy to unleash American energy by ensuing access to abundant supplies of reliable, affordable energy from (inter alia) the removal of “undue burden[s]” on the identification, development, or use of domestic energy resources such as PHMSA-jurisdictional gases and hazardous liquids. PHMSA preliminarily finds this proposed rule is consistent with each of E.O. 14156 and E.O. 14154. The proposed rule will give affected pipeline operators relief from unnecessary notifications that are not safety related. PHMSA therefore expects the regulatory amendments in this proposed rule will in turn improve pipeline operators' ability to provide abundant, reliable, affordable natural gas and hazardous liquid in response to residential, commercial, and industrial demand.

However, this proposed rule is not a “significant energy action” under E.O. 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use, which requires Federal agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for any “significant energy action.” Because this proposed rule is not a significant action under E.O. 12866, it will not have a significant adverse effect on supply, distribution, or energy use.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

PHMSA analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the principles and criteria contained in E.O. 13132, Federalism, and the Presidential Memorandum (“Preemption”) published in the Federal Register on May 22, 2009. E.O. 13132 requires agencies to assure meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that may have “substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.”

While the proposed rule may (when finalized) operate to preempt some State requirements, it would not impose any regulation that has substantial direct effects on the States, the relationship between the National Government and the States, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Section 60104(c) of the Federal Pipeline Safety Laws prohibits certain State safety regulation of interstate pipelines. Under the Federal Pipeline Safety Laws, States that have submitted a current certification under section 60105(a) can augment Federal pipeline safety requirements for intrastate pipelines regulated by PHMSA but may not approve safety requirements less stringent than those required by Federal law. A State may also regulate an intrastate pipeline facility that PHMSA does not regulate. The preemptive effect of the regulatory amendments in this proposed rule is limited to the minimum level necessary to achieve the objectives of the Federal Pipeline Safety Laws. Therefore, the consultation and funding requirements of E.O. 13132 do not apply.

F. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires Federal agencies to conduct an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) for a proposed rule subject to notice-and-comment rulemaking unless the agency head certifies that the proposed rule in the rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. E.O. 13272, Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking, obliges agencies to establish procedures promoting compliance with the RFA. DOT posts its implementing guidance on a dedicated web page. ] This proposed rule was developed in accordance with E.O. 13272 and DOT implementing guidance to ensure compliance with the RFA. The proposed rule is expected to reduce regulatory burdens by raising the threshold for construction activities to require PHMSA notification. Further, the changes proposed here are not expected to impose additional burdens on any operator. Therefore, PHMSA certifies the proposed rule (if finalized) will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.

( printed page 22094)

G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) requires agencies to assess the effects of Federal regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments, and the private sector. For any proposed or final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate of $100 million or more in 1996 dollars ($203 million in 2024 dollars) in any given year, the agency must prepare, amongst other things, a written statement that qualitatively and quantitatively assesses the costs and benefits of the Federal mandate.

This proposed rule does not impose unfunded mandates under UMRA. PHMSA does not expect the proposed rule will result in costs of $100 million or more (in 1996 dollars) per year for either State, local, or Tribal governments, or to the private sector.

H. National Environmental Policy Act

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) requires that Federal agencies assess and consider the impact of major Federal actions on the human and natural environment.

PHMSA analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with NEPA and issues this draft Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). Increasing the notification threshold on certain construction and maintenance activities to account for inflation is procedural and does not change any substantive safety standards, construction methods, or environmental mitigation requirements; whether and how an operator performs those activities does not depend on the notification obligation. The notification to PHMSA is not to seek approval, but rather to maintain an accurate assessment of the Nation's pipeline infrastructure. Therefore, PHMSA has preliminarily determined that the rulemaking will not adversely affect safety and will not significantly affect the quality of the human and natural environment. The public is invited to comment on the impact of the proposed action.

I. Executive Order 13175

PHMSA analyzed this proposed rule according to the principles and criteria in E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, and DOT Order 5301.1A (“Department of Transportation Tribal Consultation Policies and Procedures”). E.O. 13175 requires agencies to assure meaningful and timely input from Tribal government representatives in the development of rules that significantly or uniquely affect Tribal communities by imposing “substantial direct compliance costs” or “substantial direct effects” on such communities or the relationship or distribution of power between the Federal Government and Tribes.

PHMSA assessed the impact of the proposed rule and determined that it will not significantly or uniquely affect Tribal communities or Indian Tribal governments. The rulemaking's regulatory amendments have a broad, national scope; therefore, this proposed rule will not significantly or uniquely affect Tribal communities, much less impose substantial compliance costs on Native American Tribal governments or mandate Tribal action. For these reasons, PHMSA has concluded that the funding and consultation requirements of E.O. 13175 and DOT Order 5301.1A do not apply.

J. Paperwork Reduction Act

The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and its implementing regulations at 5 CFR 1320.8(d) requires that PHMSA provide interested members of the public and affected agencies with an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping requests. PHMSA is proposing to revise § 191.22(c) to update to $15 million the monetary threshold triggering an operator notification to PHMSA when the operator performs certain construction activities, and update to $250,000 or more the monetary threshold triggering an operator notification to PHMSA when the operator performs certain maintenance tasks on underground natural gas storage facilities (UNGSF). PHMSA currently receives, on average, 469 Type F notifications, annually, via the Operator Registry Notification Form (PHMSA F 1000.2). As a result of this change, PHMSA expects to receive 117 fewer Type F notifications.

PHMSA will submit the following information collection request to OMB for approval based on the adjustments in this proposed rule. This information collection is contained in the Federal Pipeline Safety Regulations, 49 CFR part 191. The following information is provided for this information collection: (1) Title of the information collection; (2) OMB control number; (3) Current expiration date; (4) Type of request; (5) Abstract of the information collection activity; (6) Description of affected public; (7) Estimate of total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden; and (8) Frequency of collection. The information collection burden for the following information collections is estimated to be revised as follows:

Title: OPID Assignment Request and Registry Notifications.

OMB Control Number: 2137-0627.

Current Expiration Date: 6/30/2028.

Type of Request: Revision.

Abstract: The National Registry of Pipeline and LNG Operators is the storehouse for the reporting requirements for an operator regulated or subject to reporting requirements under 49 CFR parts 192, 193, or 195. This mandatory information collection requires jurisdictional pipeline operators to submit the required data to register with the National Registry of Pipeline and LNG Operators and notify PHMSA when they experience significant asset changes, including new construction, that affect PHMSA's ability to monitor and assess pipeline safety performance with accuracy. Certain types of changes to, or within, an operator's facilities or pipeline network represent potential safety-altering activities for which PHMSA may need to inspect, investigate, or otherwise oversee to ensure that any public safety concerns are adequately and proactively addressed. The forms for assigning and maintaining OPID information are the Operator Assignment Request Form (PHMSA F 1000.1) and Operator Registry Notification Form (PHMSA F 1000.2). The purpose of this information collection is to maintain an accurate assessment of the Nation's pipeline infrastructure and to be kept abreast of conditions that could potentially compromise the safety and economic viability of the U.S. pipeline system. Due to the provisions contained within the Pipeline Safety: Adjustment to OPID Notifications for Construction NPRM, PHMSA expects to receive fewer notifications pertaining construction activities and maintenance tasks.

Affected Public: Operators of natural gas and hazardous liquid pipeline systems and operators of liquefied natural gas facilities.

Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:

Estimated number of responses: 627

Estimated annual burden hours: 627.

Frequency of collection: On occasion.

Requests for copies of this information collection should be directed to Angela Hill at angela.hill@dot.gov. Comments are invited on:

(a) The need for the proposed collection of information for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;

(b) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the revised ( printed page 22095) collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;

(c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques.

Send comments directly to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attn: Desk Officer for the Department of Transportation, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503. Comments should be submitted on or prior to June 23, 2026.

K. Executive Order 13609 and International Trade Analysis

E.O. 13609, Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation, requires agencies to consider whether the impacts associated with significant variations between domestic and international regulatory approaches are unnecessary or may impair the ability of American business to export and compete internationally. In meeting shared challenges involving health, safety, labor, security, environmental, and other issues, international regulatory cooperation can identify approaches that are at least as protective as those that are or would be adopted in the absence of such cooperation. International regulatory cooperation can also reduce, eliminate, or prevent unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements.

Similarly, the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465), prohibits Federal agencies from establishing any standards or engaging in related activities that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States. For purposes of these requirements, Federal agencies may participate in the establishment of international standards, so long as the standards have a legitimate domestic objective, such as providing for safety, and do not operate to exclude imports that meet this objective. The statute also requires consideration of international standards and, where appropriate, that they be the basis for U.S. standards.

PHMSA engages with international standards setting bodies to protect the safety of the American public. PHMSA has assessed the effects of the proposed rule and has determined that its proposed regulatory amendments will not cause unnecessary obstacles to foreign trade.

L. Cybersecurity and Executive Order 14028

E.O. 14028, Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity, directs the Federal Government to improve its efforts to identify, to deter, and to respond to “persistent and increasingly sophisticated malicious cyber campaigns.” PHMSA has considered the effects of the proposed rule and has determined that its proposed regulatory amendments would not materially affect the cybersecurity risk profile for pipeline facilities.

List of Subjects

49 CFR Part 191

  • Natural gas
  • Notification requirements
  • Pipeline safety

49 CFR Part 195

  • Carbon oxides
  • Notification requirements
  • Petroleum
  • Pipeline safety For the reasons set forth above, PHMSA proposes to amend 49 CFR parts 191 and 195 as follows:

PART 191—TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE; ANNUAL, INCIDENT, AND OTHER REPORTING

  1. The authority citation for Part 191 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 30 U.S.C. 185(w)(3), 49 U.S.C. 5121, 60101 et seq., and 49 CFR 1.97.

  1. In §  191.22 revise the introductory text of (c)(1) and revise paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (c)(1)(iv) to read as follows:

National Registry of Operators * * * * * (c) * * *

(1) An operator must notify PHMSA of any of the following events at least 60 days before the event occurs. For inflation adjustments observed in calendar year 2026 onwards, changes to the monetary reporting thresholds below will be posted on PHMSA's website. These changes will be determined in accordance with the procedures in Appendix A to Part 191:

(i) Construction or any planned rehabilitation, replacement, modification, upgrade, uprate, or update of a facility, other than a section of line pipe, that costs $15 million or more. If 60-day notice is not feasible because of an emergency, an operator must notify PHMSA as soon as practicable;

    • * * * (iv) Maintenance of a UNGSF that involves the plugging or abandonment of a well, or that requires a workover rig and costs $250,000 or more for an individual well, including its wellhead. If 60-day notice is not feasible because of an emergency, an operator must notify PHMSA as soon as practicable;
    • * * * 3. Revise Appendix A to Part 191 to read as follows:

Appendix A to Part 191—Procedure for Determining Reporting Thresholds

I. Reporting Threshold Formula

Each year after calendar year 2026, the Administrator will publish a notice on PHMSA's website announcing the updates to the incident reporting property damage threshold and OPID construction notification criteria that will take effect on July 1 of that year and will remain in effect until the June 30 of the next year. The reporting threshold used in this part shall be determined in accordance with the following formula:

Where:

T r is the revised reporting threshold,

T p is the previous reporting threshold,

PI r is the average price index published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics each month during the most recent complete calendar year. PHMSA will use the Consumer Price Indices for all Urban Consumers for incident reporting and the Producer Price Index for construction materials for OPID construction notifications.

PI p is the average price index for the calendar year used to establish the previous incident reporting property damage criteria or OPID construction notification criteria, as appropriate.

PART 195—TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS BY PIPELINE

  1. The authority citation for Part 195 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 30 U.S.C. 185(w)(3), 49 U.S.C. 5103, 60101 et seq., and 49 CFR 1.97.

  1. In § 195.64, revise paragraph (c)(1)(i) to read as follows:

National Registry of Operators * * * * * (c) * * *

(1) * * *

(i) Construction or any planned rehabilitation, replacement, modification, upgrade, uprate, or update of a facility, other than a section of line pipe, that costs $20 million or more. If 60-day notice is not feasible because of an emergency, an operator must notify PHMSA as soon as practicable. For inflation adjustments observed in calendar year 2026 onwards, changes to the monetary reporting thresholds ( printed page 22096) below will be posted on PHMSA's website. These changes will be determined in accordance with the procedures in Appendix D to Part 195;

  • * * * * 6. Add appendix D to Part 195 to read as follows

Appendix D to Part 195—Procedure for Determining Reporting Thresholds

I. Reporting Threshold Formula

Each year after calendar year 2026, the Administrator will publish a notice on PHMSA's website announcing the updates to property damage threshold criteria for accident reporting, National Response Center (NRC) notification, and construction notifications that will take effect on July 1 of that year and will remain in effect until the June 30 of the next year. The reporting threshold used in this part shall be determined in accordance with the following formula:

Where:

T r is the revised reporting threshold,

T p is the previous reporting threshold,

PI r is the average price index published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics each month during the most recent complete calendar year. PHMSA will use the Consumer Price Indices for all Urban Consumers for accident reporting and NRC notifications and the Producer Price Index for construction materials for OPID construction notifications.

PI p is the average price index for the calendar year used to establish the previous property damage criteria for accident reporting, NRC notification, or construction notification, as appropriate.

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 22, 2026, under the authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.97.

Paul J. Roberti,

Administrator.

Footnotes

1.

 American Gas Association and American Public Gas Association, “Comments on Ensuring Lawful Regulation; Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs” (May 5, 2025), https:// www.regulations.gov/​comment/​DOT-OST-2025-0026-0897.

2.

 Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Producer Price Index by Commodity: Special Indexes: Construction Materials (last accessed Jan. 23, 2026), https://fred.stlouisfed.org/​series/​WPUSI012011; Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Producer Price Index by Commodity: Construction (Partial): New Nonresidential Building Construction (last accessed Jan. 23, 2026), https://fred.stlouisfed.org/​series/​WPU801; DOT, National Highway Construction Cost Index (last accessed Jan. 23, 2026), https://explore.dot.gov/​views/​NHIInflationDashboard/​NHCCI_​1?​%3Aiid=​1&​%3Aembed=​y&​%3AisGuestRedirectFromVizportal=​y&​%3Adisplay_​count=​n&​%3AshowVizHome=​n&​%3Aorigin=​viz_​share_​link; Mortenson, Construction Cost Index (last accessed Jan. 23, 2026), https://www.mortenson.com/​cost-index.

3.

 DOT, Rulemaking Requirements Concerning Small Entities, https://www.transportation.gov/​regulations/​rulemaking-requirements-concerning-small-entities.

[FR Doc. 2026-08082 Filed 4-23-26; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-60-P

Published Document: 2026-08082 (91 FR 22091)

CFR references

49 CFR 191 49 CFR 195

Named provisions

OPID Notifications for Construction Adjustment to OPID Notifications

Get daily alerts for PHMSA Pipeline Safety (Federal Register)

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Transportation Department.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
Transportation Department
Comment period closes
June 23rd, 2026 (60 days)
Compliance deadline
June 23rd, 2026 (60 days)
Instrument
Consultation
Branch
Executive
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Proposed
Change scope
Substantive
Document ID
91 FR 22091 / Docket No. PHMSA-2026-1551
Docket
Docket No. PHMSA-2026-1551

Who this affects

Applies to
Transportation companies Energy companies Manufacturers
Industry sector
4831 Maritime & Shipping
Activity scope
Pipeline construction Operator notification Hazardous materials transport
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Transportation
Operational domain
Compliance
Topics
Energy Environmental Protection Carbon oxides Natural gas Petroleum

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when PHMSA Pipeline Safety (Federal Register) publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!