Changeflow GovPing Energy PHMSA Proposes Revised Property Damage Definiti...
Priority review Consultation Added Proposed

PHMSA Proposes Revised Property Damage Definition for Pipeline Incident Reporting

Favicon for www.federalregister.gov PHMSA Pipeline Safety (Federal Register)
Published
Detected
Email

Summary

PHMSA is proposing to revise the definition of 'property damage' used for reporting incidents on gas pipelines under 49 CFR 191 and accidents on hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide pipelines under 49 CFR 195. The proposed rule would alter the threshold and methodology for calculating property damage when reporting pipeline incidents to PHMSA. The agency is seeking public comments on the revised definition, with comments due 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. Pipeline operators should review the proposed changes and consider submitting comments by the deadline.

“This document has a comment period that ends in 60 days. (06/23/2026)”

Why this matters

Pipeline operators subject to 49 CFR Parts 191 and 195 reporting requirements should monitor this rulemaking closely. Any change to the property damage definition could affect whether certain incidents or accidents meet the reporting threshold. Operators with borderline incidents that have not been reported under the current definition should consider whether revised thresholds might capture those events, and review internal documentation practices accordingly.

AI-drafted from the source document, validated against GovPing's analyst note standards . For the primary regulatory language, read the source document .
Published by Transportation Department on federalregister.gov . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors PHMSA Pipeline Safety (Federal Register) for new energy regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 15 changes logged to date.

What changed

PHMSA is proposing to revise the definition of 'property damage' that pipeline operators must use when determining whether an incident or accident meets the reporting threshold under Federal pipeline safety regulations. The proposed rule affects reporting obligations for operators of gas distribution and transmission pipelines under 49 CFR Part 191, as well as hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide pipeline operators under 49 CFR Part 195. The change would modify how property damage amounts are calculated for reporting purposes, potentially expanding or clarifying what qualifies as reportable damage.\n\nPipeline operators should monitor this rulemaking closely as any revision to the property damage definition will directly impact incident reporting thresholds and may affect compliance obligations. Operators should prepare to submit comments on the proposed definition by June 23, 2026, and review whether current internal damage calculation methodologies will need adjustment if the new definition is finalized.

What to do next

  1. Submit public comments to PHMSA via Regulations.gov by June 23, 2026
  2. Review proposed definition changes to 49 CFR 191 and 49 CFR 195 property damage thresholds

Archived snapshot

Apr 24, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Legal Status This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.

The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.

The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.

Legal Status

Proposed Rule

Pipeline Safety: Property Damage Definition for Reporting Incidents on Gas Pipelines and Accidents on Hazardous Liquid and Carbon Dioxide Pipelines

A Proposed Rule by the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration on 04/24/2026

  • 1.

1.
This document has a comment period that ends in 60 days.
(06/23/2026) Submit a public comment

Thank you for taking the time to create a comment. Your input is important.

Once you have filled in the required fields below you can preview and/or submit your comment to the Transportation Department for review. All comments are considered public and will be posted online once the Transportation Department has reviewed them.

You can view or you may also comment via Regulations.gov at https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/PHMSA-2025-0109-0008.

It appears that you have attempted to comment on this document before
so we've restored your progress.
.
1.
2. Comment * What is your comment about? Upload File(s) Note: You can attach your comment as a file and/or attach supporting
documents to your comment. Attachment Requirements.

Email this will NOT be posted on regulations.gov

Opt to receive email confirmation of submission and tracking number? Tell us about yourself! I am... * An Individual An Organization Anonymous First Name * Last Name * City Region State Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Guam Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virgin Islands Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Zip Country Afghanistan Åland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Phone Organization Type * Company Organization Federal State Local Tribal Regional Foreign U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate Organization Name * You are filing a document into an official docket. Any personal
information included in your comment text and/or uploaded
attachment(s)
may be publicly viewable on the web. I read and understand the statement above.

  1. Please review the Regulations.gov privacy notice and user notice.
  2. Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agencies Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Agency/Docket Number Docket No. PHMSA-2025-0109 CFR 49 CFR 191 49 CFR 195 Document Citation 91 FR 22096 Document Number 2026-08079 Document Type Proposed Rule Pages 22096-22100 (5 pages) Publication Date 04/24/2026 RIN 2137-AF78 Published Content - Document Details
  • PDF Official Content
  • Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agencies Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Agency/Docket Number Docket No. PHMSA-2025-0109 CFR 49 CFR 191 49 CFR 195 Document Citation 91 FR 22096 Document Number 2026-08079 Document Type Proposed Rule Pages 22096-22100 (5 pages) Publication Date 04/24/2026 RIN 2137-AF78 Published Content - Document Details
  • Document Dates Published Content - Document Dates Comments Close 06/23/2026 Dates Text Comments must be received on or before June 23, 2026. Published Content - Document Dates
  • Table of Contents Enhanced Content - Table of Contents This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
    headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
    This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
    has no substantive legal effect.

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    - Executive Order 12866

    - Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    -

    - Executive Order 13175

    - Executive Order 14028

    - 49 CFR Part 195

    -

    • Enhanced Content - Table of Contents
  • Related Documents Enhanced Content - Related Documents FederalRegister.gov uses the agency dockets published with the document to display related documents.

| Docket No. PHMSA-2025-0109
(3 Documents) |
| --- |
| Date | | Action | Title |
| | 2026-04-24 | Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). | Pipeline Safety: Property Damage Definition for Reporting Incidents on Gas Pipelines and Accidents on Hazardous Liquid and Carbon Dioxide Pipelines |
| | 2025-10-02 | Withdrawal of direct final rule (DFR). | Pipeline Safety: Property Damage Definition for Incident Reporting on Gas Pipelines and Accidents on Hazardous Liquid Pipelines |
| | 2025-07-01 | Direct final rule (DFR); request for comments. | Pipeline Safety: Property Damage Definition for Incident Reporting on Gas Pipelines and Accidents on Hazardous Liquid Pipelines |

Enhanced Content - Related Documents

Enhanced Content - Public Comments
- Regulations.gov Data Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data

FederalRegister.gov retrieves relevant information about this document
from Regulations.gov to provide users with additional context. This
information is not part of the official Federal Register document.

Pipeline Safety: Property Damage Threshold for Incident and Accident Reporting

Comment Due Date 06/23/2026 Docket ID PHMSA-2025-0109 Supporting Documents PRIA-Property Damage Definition Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data

- Sharing Enhanced Content - Sharing Shorter Document URL https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2026-08079 Email Email this document to a friend Enhanced Content - Sharing

  • Print Enhanced Content - Print
    • Enhanced Content - Print
  • Other Formats Enhanced Content - Other Formats This document is also available in the following formats:

JSON Normalized attributes and metadata XML Original full text XML MODS Government Publishing Office metadata More information and documentation can be found in our developer tools pages.

Enhanced Content - Other Formats
- Public Inspection Public Inspection This PDF is FR Doc. 2026-08079 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
04/23/2026 at 8:45 am.

It was viewed
27
times while on Public Inspection.

If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.

Public Inspection
Published Document: 2026-08079 (91 FR 22096) This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain
the following:

  1. the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
  2. the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to
  3. the agency docket number / agency internal file number
  4. the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.
Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
  1. 49 CFR Parts 191 and 195
  2. [Docket No. PHMSA-2025-0109]
  3. RIN 2137-AF78

AGENCY:

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION:

Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY:

PHMSA proposes to revise the definition of property damage for determining when a release from a gas, hazardous liquid, or carbon dioxide pipeline facility meets the definition of a reportable incident or accident, including for immediate notifications to the National Response Center. This NPRM addresses comments received in response to a now-withdrawn direct final rule covering the same topic.

DATES:

Comments must be received on or before June 23, 2026.

ADDRESSES:

You may submit comments identified by the Docket Number PHMSA-2025-0109 using any of the following methods:

E-Gov Web: https://www.regulations.gov. This site allows the public to enter comments on any Federal Register notice issued by any agency. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.

Mail: Docket Management System: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.

Hand Delivery: U.S. DOT Docket Management System: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Fax: 1-202-493-2251.

For commenting instructions and additional information about commenting, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sayler Palabrica, Transportation Specialist, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, 202-744-0825, sayler.palabrica@dot.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Discussion

On July 1, 2025, PHMSA published a direct final rule (DFR) clarifying the property damage thresholds that apply in determining whether a release is a reportable incident pursuant to 49 CFR 191.9 or 191.15 or reportable accident pursuant to 49 CFR 195.50(e) to exclude certain indirect costs associated with accessing the facility to perform repairs (90 FR 28050 (July 1, 2025)). The DFR would have also adopted for hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide pipeline accident reporting under Part 195 the inflation adjustment methodology that was previously adopted for reporting gas pipeline incidents in § 191.3 and Appendix A to Part 191. PHMSA received four comments from the public in response to the DFR, including adverse comments as defined in 49 CFR 190.339(b). PHMSA therefore withdrew the DFR in accordance with the Agency's DFR procedures in § 190.339. For the reasons described in the DFR and this NPRM, PHMSA reproposes the amendments in the DFR with revisions to address public comments.

The American Petroleum Institute, the Liquid Energy Pipeline Association, and Enbridge submitted comments noting that the DFR creates a misalignment between the property damage criterion for submitting 30-day reports of accidents under § 195.50 and the immediate notifications to the National Response Center (NRC) under § 195.52. ] In comparison, the requirements for NRC notifications for gas pipeline incidents in § 191.5 cross-reference the incident definition in § 191.3 and, therefore, the criteria remain aligned. Enbridge also recommended an editorial correction to a cross-reference in Appendix D to Part 195. PHMSA notes that the omission of updates for the NRC reporting criteria in § 195.52 was not intended.

The Pipeline Safety Trust (PST) and the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) submitted comments objecting to the DFR on procedural grounds. ] These commenters also raised concern that the revised property damage threshold for reporting accidents and other clarifications to the property damage definition would reduce the amount of safety data available to the public and to PHMSA. PST commented that it was unclear whether the DFR applied to carbon dioxide pipelines and raised concerns that that the accident criteria already filter out “many large and potentially dangerous safety-related ( printed page 22097) events.” Both PST and EDF commented that reducing the number of accident reports submitted to PHMSA reduces the value of the database, particularly for trend analysis, and undermines Federal and public oversight.

PHMSA is addressing procedural concerns raised by public comments by publishing this NPRM with a risk assessment (preliminary regulatory impact analysis (PRIA)). PHMSA also emphasizes that accident report and immediate notice requirements in §§ 195.50 and 195.52, and therefore any revisions to those requirements, apply to both hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide pipelines. PHMSA maintains that, under the proposed accident definition, consequential releases remain reportable. The other criteria for fire or explosion, a release of five gallons or more (or five barrels (210 gallons) for certain contained releases), and injury resulting in death or hospitalization remain reportable regardless of a change in the property damage definition. Accidents with between $50,000 and $149,700 of property damage that do not meet the other criteria are definitionally the least-consequential releases reported to PHMSA and would likely not have been reported when the accident definition was put into place. Incidents and accidents where the sole consequences are temporary removal of pavement, permit acquisition, and repair costs are even less significant and likely do not warrant the urgent, detailed reporting required for incident and annual reports.

In addition, PHMSA disagrees with the comments it received that revising the property damage definition upsets trend analysis. In fact, a static property damage criteria results in the incident or accident definition changing over time in inflation-adjusted terms; PHMSA has historically accounted for this fact in trend analysis of “significant incidents” that filter out incidents and accidents with less than $50,000 in costs in 1984 dollars. ] Finally, regarding the cost of lost product in hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide pipeline accident reports, operators are required to report estimated release volumes. The total cost of lost product can be derived from this information using current or historical price information from sources such as the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Requiring this information from the operator is not necessary.

For the reasons described above and set forth in the DFR, PHMSA reproposes the amendments it proposed in the DFR with revisions to ensure the property damage criterion for NRC reporting in § 195.52 are consistent with accident reporting requirements in § 195.50. This proposal is consistent with historical practice and avoids unnecessarily complicated reporting procedures. As an alternative, PHMSA requests comment on replacing the immediate notice criteria in § 195.52(a)(1) through (a)(3) and (a)(4) with a cross-reference to the accident criteria in § 195.50. PHMSA proposes to retain the water pollution criteria for NRC reporting because it supports the implementation of oil spill response plan requirements in Part 194. The NPRM also proposes editorial amendments to Appendix D to Part 195 to correct the cross-reference to § 195.50(e) and to include the cross-reference to the amended § 195.52(a)(3). The proposals to adopt inflation-adjusted incident and accident definitions in parts 191 and 195 are otherwise unchanged.

This NPRM also includes the proposal to address National Association of Pipeline Safety Representatives Resolution 2021-01, “A Resolution Seeking a Modification of PHMSA's Instructions for Incident Reporting for Gas Distribution, Gas Transmission, and Gas Gathering Systems,” described in the DFR. Specifically, PHMSA proposes to revise the definitions of the terms incident and accident to clarify that the costs associated with obtaining permits and removing or replacing infrastructure undamaged by an event (e.g., the cost to temporarily remove pavement needed for access and repair activity) do not need to be included when calculating the property damage reporting threshold. Though operators would still report indirect impacts as consequences on the incident and accident report forms, those impacts do not determine if an event is reportable.

Finally, PHMSA proposes to revise the property damage criterion for gas pipelines to $149,700 in both § 191.3 and Appendix A to Part 191 to align it with the proposed criterion for hazardous liquid pipelines. This property damage criterion value is currently published on PHMSA's website and proposing to republish it in the regulations has no substantive effect other than making it clearer that the property damage criteria in parts 191 and 195 are the same.

PHMSA, in a parallel action titled “Pipeline Safety: Adjustment to OPID Notifications for Construction,” is proposing to adopt a similar inflation adjustment procedure to construction notifications based on year-on-year change in the Producer Price Index (PPI) for construction materials. ] PHMSA repeats the proposed Appendix D language in both NPRMs. ]

Commenting Instructions: Please include the docket number PHMSA-2025-0109 at the beginning of your comments. If you submit your comments by mail, submit two copies. If you wish to receive confirmation that PHMSA received your comments, include a self-addressed stamped postcard. Internet users may submit comments at https://www.regulations.gov.

Note:

Comments are posted without changes or edits to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. There is a privacy statement published on https://www.regulations.gov.

Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to https://www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.dot.gov/​privacy.

Confidential Business Information: Confidential Business Information (CBI) is commercial or financial information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public disclosure. It is important that you clearly designate the comments submitted as CBI if: your comments responsive to this document contain commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as private; you actually treat such information as private; and your comment is relevant or responsive to this notice. Pursuant to 49 CFR 190.343, you may ask PHMSA to provide confidential treatment to information you give to the agency by taking the following steps: (1) mark each page of the original document submission containing CBI as “Confidential;” (2) send PHMSA, along with the original document, a second copy of the original document with the CBI deleted; and (3) explain why the information that you are submitting is ( printed page 22098) CBI. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Sayler Palabrica, Office of Pipeline Safety Standards and Rulemaking Division, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), 2nd Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, or by email at sayler.palabrica@dot.gov. Any materials PHMSA receives that is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket.

Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for accessing the docket. Alternatively, you may review the documents in person at the street address listed above.

II. Regulatory Analysis and Notices:

A. Legal Authority

This proposed rule is published under the authority of the Secretary of Transportation set forth in the Federal Pipeline Safety Laws (49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.) and delegated to the PHMSA Administrator pursuant to 49 CFR 1.97.

B. Statutory Requirement and Executive Order 12866

The Federal Pipeline Safety Laws (49 U.S.C. 60102(b)) require that PHMSA prepare a risk assessment that identifies the costs and benefits associated with a proposed regulatory change. E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as implemented by DOT Order 2100.6B (“Policies and Procedures for Rulemaking”) and DOT Order 2100.7 (“Ensuring Reliance upon Sound Economic Analysis in Department of Transportation Policies, Programs, and Activities”), requires agencies to regulate in the “most cost-effective manner,” to make a “reasoned determination that the benefits of the intended regulation justify its costs,” and to develop regulations that “impose the least burden on society.” In arriving at those conclusions, E.O. 12866 requires that agencies should consider “both quantifiable measures . . . and qualitative measures of costs and benefits that are difficult to quantify” and “maximize net benefits . . . unless a statute requires another regulatory approach.” E.O. 12866 also requires that “agencies should assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives, including the alternative of not regulating.” DOT Order 2100.6B directs that PHMSA and other Operating Administrations must generally choose the “least costly regulatory alternative that achieves the relevant objectives” unless required by law or compelling safety need. DOT Order 2100.6B also specifies that regulations should generally “not be issued unless their benefits are expected to exceed their costs.” DOT Order 2100.7 requires that “all rulemaking activities shall be based on sound economic principles and analysis supported by rigorous cost-benefit requirement.”

E.O. 12866 and DOT Order 2100.6B also require that PHMSA submit “significant regulatory actions” to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) within the Executive Office of the President's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. This proposed rule is a not significant regulatory action pursuant to E.O. 12866; OMB also has not designated this rule as a “major rule” as defined by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.).

PHMSA has complied with the procedural and analytical requirements in E.O. 12866 as implemented by DOT Order 2100.6B and DOT Order 2100.7, as well as the requirements in 49 U.S.C. 60102(b) and preliminarily determined that this NPRM will result in some cost savings by reducing regulatory burdens associated with submitting urgent, detailed reports of low-consequence releases from hazardous liquid and carbon dioxide pipelines. Based on historical incident data, PHMSA estimates that approximately five incidents per year would meet the current reporting requirements but not the proposed requirements, out of an average of over 370 incidents per year. The accompanying PRIA provides detailed estimates of the cost savings to operators from the reduced reporting burden. PHMSA estimates that the changes in the proposed rule would result in cost savings of $5,235 annually. PHMSA expects these cost savings may also result in reduced costs for the public to whom pipeline operators generally transfer a portion of their compliance costs. PHMSA has also preliminarily determined that the NPRM will not have any adverse safety and environmental effects since the average release of those incidents that would have been exempted was less than four gallons.

C. Executive Orders 14192 and 14219

This proposed rule, if finalized as proposed, is expected to be a deregulatory action pursuant to E.O. 14192, Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation. PHMSA estimates that the total costs of the NPRM on the regulated community will be less than zero. Nor does this rulemaking implicate any of the factors identified in section 2(a) of E.O. 14219, Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's “Department of Government Efficiency” Deregulatory Initiative, indicative that a regulation is “unlawful . . . [or] that undermine[s] the national interest.”

D. Energy-Related Executive Orders 13211, 14154, and 14156

The President has declared in E.O. 14156, Declaring a National Energy Emergency, a National emergency to address America's inadequate energy development production, transportation, refining, and generation capacity. Similarly, E.O. 14154, Unleashing American Energy, asserts a Federal policy to unleash American energy by ensuing access to abundant supplies of reliable, affordable energy from (inter alia) the removal of “undue burden[s]” on the identification, development, or use of domestic energy resources such as PHMSA-jurisdictional gases and hazardous liquids. PHMSA preliminarily finds this NPRM is consistent with each of E.O. 14156 and E.O. 14154. The NPRM will give affected pipeline operators relief from submitting detailed reports for relatively minor releases.

However, this NPRM is not a “significant energy action” under E.O. 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use, which requires Federal agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for any “significant energy action.” Because this NPRM is not a significant action under E.O. 12866, it will not have a significant adverse effect on supply, distribution, or energy use; OIRA has therefore not designated this NPRM as a significant energy action.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

PHMSA analyzed this NPRM in accordance with the principles and criteria contained in E.O. 13132, Federalism, and the Presidential Memorandum (“Preemption”) published in the Federal Register on May 22, 2009. E.O. 13132 requires agencies to assure meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that may have “substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.”

Though the NPRM may (when finalized) operate to preempt some State requirements, it would not impose any regulation that has substantial direct effects on the States, the relationship ( printed page 22099) between the National Government and the States, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Section 60104(c) of the Federal Pipeline Safety Laws prohibits certain State safety regulation of interstate pipelines. Under the Federal Pipeline Safety Laws, States that have submitted a current certification under section 60105(a) can augment Federal pipeline safety requirements for intrastate pipelines regulated by PHMSA but may not approve safety requirements less stringent than those required by Federal law. A State may also regulate an intrastate pipeline facility that PHMSA does not regulate. The preemptive effect of the regulatory amendments in this NPRM is limited to the minimum level necessary to achieve the objectives of the Federal Pipeline Safety Laws. Therefore, the consultation and funding requirements of E.O. 13132 do not apply.

F. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires Federal agencies to conduct an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) for a NPRM subject to notice-and-comment rulemaking unless the agency head certifies that the NPRM in the rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. E.O. 13272, Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking, obliges agencies to establish procedures promoting compliance with the RFA. DOT posts its implementing guidance on a dedicated web page. ]

This NPRM was developed in accordance with E.O. 13272 and DOT implementing guidance to ensure compliance with the RFA. The NPRM is expected to reduce regulatory burdens by raising the monetary threshold for incidents to qualify as reportable, and by clarifying which costs contribute to that threshold for operators who would otherwise be unaware. Further, the changes proposed here are not expected to impose additional burdens on any operator. Therefore, PHMSA certifies this proposed rule (if finalized) will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.

G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) requires agencies to assess the effects of Federal regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments, and the private sector. For any proposed or final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate of $100 million or more in 1996 dollars ($203 million in 2024 dollars) in any given year, the agency must prepare, amongst other things, a written statement that qualitatively and quantitatively assesses the costs and benefits of the Federal mandate.

This NPRM does not impose unfunded mandates under UMRA. PHMSA does not expect the NPRM will result in costs of $100 million or more (in 1996 dollars) per year for either State, local, or Tribal governments, or to the private sector.

H. National Environmental Policy Act

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) requires that Federal agencies assess and consider the impact of major Federal actions on the human and natural environment.

PHMSA analyzed this NPRM in accordance with NEPA and issues this draft Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). PHMSA maintains that under the proposed accident definition, consequential releases remain reportable. The other criteria for fire or explosion, release of five gallons or more (or five barrels (210 gallons) for certain contained releases), and injury resulting in death or hospitalization remain reportable regardless of a change in the property damage definition. In addition, because changing the reportability threshold does not change the way operators respond to incidents, the environmental impacts do not change. Therefore, PHMSA has preliminarily determined that the rulemaking will not adversely affect safety and will not significantly affect the quality of the human and natural environment. The public is invited to comment on the impact of the proposed action.

I. Executive Order 13175

PHMSA analyzed this NPRM according to the principles and criteria in E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, and DOT Order 5301.1A (“Department of Transportation Tribal Consultation Policies and Procedures”). E.O. 13175 requires agencies to assure meaningful and timely input from Tribal government representatives in the development of rules that significantly or uniquely affect Tribal communities by imposing “substantial direct compliance costs” or “substantial direct effects” on such communities or the relationship or distribution of power between the Federal Government and Tribes.

PHMSA assessed the impact of the NPRM and determined that it will not significantly or uniquely affect Tribal communities or Indian Tribal governments. The rulemaking's regulatory amendments have a broad, national scope; therefore, this NPRM will not significantly or uniquely affect Tribal communities, much less impose substantial compliance costs on Native American Tribal governments or mandate Tribal action. For these reasons, PHMSA has concluded that the funding and consultation requirements of E.O. 13175 and DOT Order 5301.1A do not apply.

J. Paperwork Reduction Act

The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and its implementing regulations at 5 CFR 1320.8(d) requires that PHMSA provide interested members of the public and affected agencies with an opportunity to comment on information collection and recordkeeping requests.

PHMSA will submit an information collection revision request to OMB for approval based on the requirements in this NPRM. The information collection is contained in the Federal Pipeline Safety Regulations. The following information is provided for each information collection: (1) Title of the information collection; (2) OMB control number; (3) Current expiration date; (4) Type of request; (5) Abstract of the information collection activity; (6) Description of affected public; (7) Estimate of total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden; and (8) Frequency of collection. The information collection burdens for the following information collections are estimated to be revised as follows:

1. Title: Transportation of Hazardous Liquids by Pipeline: Record keeping and Accident Reporting.

OMB Control Number: 2137-0047.

Current Expiration Date: 04/30/2026.

Abstract: This information collection covers general recordkeeping and the collection of information from hazardous liquid pipeline operators for accident reports. PHMSA estimates that, due to the revised monetary damage threshold for reporting accidents, operators will submit five fewer hazardous liquid accident reports per year. Therefore, PHMSA expects to eliminate five responses and 60 hours from this information collection per year as a result of the provisions in the rule.

Affected Public: All hazardous liquid pipeline operators. ( printed page 22100)

Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:

Total Annual Responses: 1,641 (1,646−5).

Total Annual Burden Hours: 53,717 (53,777−60).

Frequency of Collection: On Occasion.

K. Executive Order 13609 and International Trade Analysis

E.O. 13609, Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation, requires agencies to consider whether the impacts associated with significant variations between domestic and international regulatory approaches are unnecessary or may impair the ability of American business to export and compete internationally. In meeting shared challenges involving health, safety, labor, security, environmental, and other issues, international regulatory cooperation can identify approaches that are at least as protective as those that are or would be adopted in the absence of such cooperation. International regulatory cooperation can also reduce, eliminate, or prevent unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements.

Similarly, the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465), prohibits Federal agencies from establishing any standards or engaging in related activities that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States. For purposes of these requirements, Federal agencies may participate in the establishment of international standards, so long as the standards have a legitimate domestic objective, such as providing for safety, and do not operate to exclude imports that meet this objective. The statute also requires consideration of international standards and, where appropriate, that they be the basis for U.S. standards.

PHMSA engages with international standards setting bodies to protect the safety of the American public. PHMSA has assessed the effects of the NPRM and has determined that its regulatory amendments will not cause unnecessary obstacles to foreign trade.

L. Cybersecurity and Executive Order 14028

E.O. 14028, Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity, directs the Federal Government to improve its efforts to identify, deter, and respond to “persistent and increasingly sophisticated malicious cyber campaigns.” PHMSA has considered the effects of the NPRM and has determined that its regulatory amendments would not materially affect the cybersecurity risk profile for pipeline facilities.

List of Subjects

49 CFR Part 191

  • Natural gas
  • Pipeline safety
  • Reporting and recordkeeping requirements

49 CFR Part 195

  • Pipeline safety
  • Reporting and recordkeeping requirements In consideration of the foregoing, PHMSA proposes to amend 49 CFR parts 191 and 195 as follows:

PART 191—TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL AND OTHER GAS BY PIPELINE; ANNUAL, INCIDENT, AND OTHER REPORTING

  1. The authority citation for Part 191 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 30 U.S.C. 185(w)(3), 49 U.S.C. 5121, 60101 et seq., and 49 CFR 1.97.

  1. In § 191.3, revise paragraph (1)(ii) in the definition of “Incident” to read as follows:

Definitions. * * * * * Incident * * *

(1) * * *

(ii) Estimated property damage of $149,700 or more, including loss to the operator and others, or both, but excluding each of the cost of gas lost, the cost to acquire permits, and the cost to remove and replace non-operator infrastructure that was not damaged by the release. For adjustments for inflation observed in calendar year 2026 onwards, changes to the reporting threshold will be posted on PHMSA's website. These changes will be determined in accordance with the procedures in Appendix A to Part 191.


PART 195—TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS BY PIPELINE

  1. The authority citation for Part 195 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 30 U.S.C. 185(w)(3), 49 U.S.C. 5121, 60101 et seq., and 49 CFR 1.97.

  1. Revise § 195.50(e) to read as follows:

Reporting Accidents. * * * * * (e) Estimated property damage, including cost of clean-up and recovery and damage to the property of the operator or others—but excluding each of the cost of lost product, the cost to acquire permits, and the cost to remove and replace non-operator infrastructure that was not damaged by the release—exceeding $149,700. For adjustments for inflation observed in calendar year 2026 onwards, changes to the reporting threshold will be posted on PHMSA's website. These changes will be determined in accordance with the procedures in Appendix D to Part 195.

  1. Revise § 195.52(a)(3) to read as follows:

Immediate notice of certain accidents. (a) * * *

(3) Caused estimated property damage meeting the criteria in § 195.50(e).

  • * * * * 6. In Part 195, add Appendix D to read as follows:

Appendix D to Part 195—Procedure for Determining Reporting Threshold

Each year after calendar year 2026, the Administrator will publish a notice on PHMSA's website announcing the updates to property damage threshold criteria for accident reporting, National Response Center (NRC) notification, and construction notifications that will take effect on July 1 of that year and will remain in effect until June 30 of the next year. The reporting threshold used in this Part shall be determined in accordance with the following formula:

Where:

T r is the revised reporting threshold,

T p is the previous reporting threshold,

PI r is the average price index published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics each month during the most recent complete calendar year. PHMSA will use the Consumer Price Indices for all Urban Consumers for accident reporting and NRC notifications and the Producer Price Index for construction materials for OPID construction notifications.

PI p is the average price index for the calendar year used to establish the previous property damage criteria for accident reporting, NRC notification, or construction notification, as appropriate.

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 22, 2026, under the authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.97.

Paul J. Roberti,

Administrator.

Footnotes

1.

 American Petroleum Institute and Liquid Energy Pipeline Association, “Comment on Pipeline Safety: Property Damage Definition for Incident Reporting on Gas Pipelines and Accidents on Hazardous Liquid Pipelines” at 2 (Sep. 2, 2025), https://www.regulations.gov/​comment/​PHMSA-2025-0109-0004.

2.

 Enbridge, “Comment on Pipeline Safety: Property Damage Definition for Incident Reporting on Gas Pipelines and Accidents on Hazardous Liquid Pipelines” at 1 (July 25, 2025), https://www.regulations.gov/​comment/​PHMSA-2025-0109-0002.

3.

 Pipeline Safety Trust, “Comment on Pipeline Safety: Property Damage Definition for Incident Reporting on Gas Pipelines and Accidents on Hazardous Liquid Pipelines” (Sept. 2, 2025), https://www.regulations.gov/​comment/​PHMSA-2025-0109-0003.

4.

 Environmental Defense Fund, “Comment on Pipeline Safety: Property Damage Definition for Incident Reporting on Gas Pipelines and Accidents on Hazardous Liquid Pipelines” (Sept. 2, 2025), https://www.regulations.gov/​comment/​PHMSA-2025-0109-0005.

5.

 PHMSA, Pipeline Incident 20 Year Trends (Aug. 27, 2025), https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/​data-and-statistics/​pipeline/​pipeline-incident-20-year-trends.

6.

 Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Producer Price Index by Commodity: Special Indexes: Construction Materials (last accessed Jan. 23, 2026), available at: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/​series/​WPUSI012011.

7.


See
Docket No. PHMSA-2026-1551, RIN 2137-AG55 (proposing inflation adjustment of the construction notification requirements in subpart B to part 195).

8.

 DOT, Rulemaking Requirements Concerning Small Entities, https://www.transportation.gov/​regulations/​rulemaking-requirements-concerning-small-entities.

[FR Doc. 2026-08079 Filed 4-23-26; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-60-P

Published Document: 2026-08079 (91 FR 22096)

CFR references

49 CFR 191 49 CFR 195

Named provisions

Property Damage Definition Incident Reporting Requirements Accident Reporting Requirements

Get daily alerts for PHMSA Pipeline Safety (Federal Register)

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from Transportation Department.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
Transportation Department
Published
April 24th, 2026
Comment period closes
June 23rd, 2026 (60 days)
Compliance deadline
June 23rd, 2026 (60 days)
Instrument
Consultation
Branch
Executive
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Proposed
Change scope
Substantive
Document ID
91 FR 22096 / Docket No. PHMSA-2025-0109
Docket
Docket No. PHMSA-2025-0109

Who this affects

Applies to
Energy companies Transportation companies
Industry sector
2111 Oil & Gas Extraction
Activity scope
Pipeline incident reporting Pipeline accident reporting Gas pipeline safety compliance
Geographic scope
United States US

Taxonomy

Primary area
Transportation
Operational domain
Compliance
Topics
Environmental Protection Energy Natural gas Pipeline safety Reporting and recordkeeping requirements

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when PHMSA Pipeline Safety (Federal Register) publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!