University of York FOIA Complaint - Not Upheld
Summary
The Information Commissioner's Office issued a Decision Notice finding that the University of York correctly handled a Freedom of Information request for professional emails between four named staff members. The university disclosed responsive information while withholding some third-party personal data under section 40(2) FOIA. The Commissioner determined the university does not hold further information within scope and that the exemption was properly applied. No remedial steps are required.
What changed
The ICO issued a Decision Notice in case IC-407347-P6Y7 concerning a complainant's request for professional emails exchanged between four named individuals at the University of York from January 2023. The university disclosed information within scope, redacting personal content, and withheld some data under section 40(2) FOIA as third-party personal data. The Commissioner found on the balance of probabilities that no further information is held and the exemption was correctly applied.\n\nFor public authorities handling FOIA requests, this decision confirms that disclosing non-exempt information while withholding third-party personal data under section 40(2) is appropriate where disclosure would contravene UK GDPR obligations. Universities and similar public authorities should ensure email management systems can identify responsive records and apply exemptions correctly when disclosing to requesters.
What to do next
- Monitor for updates
Archived snapshot
Apr 9, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
University of York
- Date 31 March 2026
- Sector Education
- Decision(s) FOI 1: Not upheld, FOI 40(2): Not upheld The complainant requested copies of professional or academic emails and attachments exchanged between four named individuals at the University of York from 1 January 2023, with personal content redacted. The university disclosed the information it held within scope, withholding some information under section 40(2) of FOIA as third‑party personal data. The Commissioner finds that, on the balance of probabilities, the university does not hold any further information within scope and that section 40(2) was correctly applied. No steps are required.
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for ICO Decision Notices
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from ICO.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when ICO Decision Notices publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.