Changeflow GovPing Data Privacy & Cybersecurity ICO Decision: Lewisham Council FOI 17 Upheld, 4...
Routine Enforcement Amended Final

ICO Decision: Lewisham Council FOI 17 Upheld, 40(2) Not Upheld

Favicon for ico.org.uk ICO Decision Notices
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) issued a decision regarding a Freedom of Information (FOI) request made to Lewisham Council. The ICO upheld the council's decision to withhold information under FOI section 40(2) but found the council breached section 17 by failing to issue a timely refusal notice.

What changed

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has issued a decision notice concerning a Freedom of Information (FOI) request made to Lewisham Council regarding a selective licensing scheme. The ICO found that the council was justified in withholding information under section 40(2) of the FOIA, which pertains to third-party personal data. The Commissioner also concluded that the council had provided all information held within the scope of the request.

However, the ICO determined that Lewisham Council breached section 17 of the FOIA by failing to issue a refusal notice within the statutory 20-working-day period. Despite this breach, the Commissioner has not required any specific steps to be taken as a result of this decision, indicating no further action is mandated for the council.

Archived snapshot

Mar 24, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

London Borough Of Lewisham

  • Date 20 March 2026
  • Sector Local government
  • Decision(s) FOI 17: Upheld, FOI 40(2): Not upheld The complainant made a request concerning the selective licensing scheme introduced by London Borough of Lewisham (the council), and a specific property address. The council provided information in scope of the request but withheld information it considered to be personal data. The council explained that it had provided all the information it held in scope of the request except for information withheld under section 40(2) (third-party personal information) of FOIA. The Commissioner considers that section 40(2) of FOIA applies to the withheld information and that the council was entitled to rely on the exemption in this case. He also finds that on the balance of probabilities; the council had provided all the information it held within scope of the request. However, the Commissioner finds the council breached section 17 of FOIA for failing to issue a refusal notice stating it was relying on section 40(2) within 20 working days of receipt of the original request. The Commissioner does not require any steps as a result of this decision.

Named provisions

FOI 17 FOI 40(2) Section 17 Section 40(2)

Get daily alerts for ICO Decision Notices

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from ICO.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
ICO
Filed
March 20th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
ICO decision: Lewisham council FOI 17 upheld, 40(2) not
Docket
IC-401488-S3W8

Who this affects

Applies to
Government agencies
Industry sector
9211 Government & Public Administration
Activity scope
Freedom of Information requests
Geographic scope
United Kingdom GB

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Freedom of Information Data Privacy

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when ICO Decision Notices publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!