ICO Decision: London Borough of Redbridge FOI Inspection Dates Upheld Addresses Exempt
Summary
FOI Decision, Redbridge, Inspection Dates Upheld, Addresses Exempt
What changed
The Information Commissioner's Office issued a decision notice regarding Freedom of Information requests submitted to the London Borough of Redbridge. The complainant sought dates of inspections conducted on rental properties owned by Councillor Athwal. The Council initially withheld this information under section 40(2) of FOIA (personal data exemption). The ICO determined that the inspection dates themselves are not exempt under section 40(2) and must be disclosed, while the property addresses are protected under section 44(1)(a) due to a statutory prohibition on disclosure.
Local government authorities and public bodies subject to FOIA should note this decision as guidance on the proper application of personal data exemptions versus statutory prohibitions. The distinction drawn here — that factual inspection dates do not constitute personal data warranting exemption, while property addresses remain protected — may influence how similar requests are handled across other councils and public authorities. Compliance functions should flag this decision to FOI officers and ensure that exemption claims are narrowly tailored to the specific information at issue.
What to do next
- Review FOI exemption decisions to ensure section 40(2) personal data exemptions are correctly scoped
- Confirm compliance with ICO decision IC-464092-N3P0 within the specified timeframe
- Update FOI handling procedures for property inspection records
Archived snapshot
Apr 10, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
London Borough of Redbridge
- Date 31 March 2026
- Sector Local government
- Decision(s) FOI 40: Upheld, FOI 44: Not upheld The complainant submitted a request to the London Borough of Redbridge (the Council) seeking the dates which it had inspected the rental properties owned by the (then) Councillor Athwal. The Council withheld the requested information on the basis of section 40(2) of FOIA. The Commissioner’s decision is that the dates the properties were inspected are not exempt from disclosure on the basis of section 40(2) (personal data) but the addresses of the properties are exempt from on the basis of section 44(1)(a) (statutory prohibition) of FOIA.
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for ICO Decision Notices
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from ICO.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when ICO Decision Notices publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.