Castle Point Borough Council - FOI Complaint Partly Upheld
Summary
The ICO issued a Decision Notice concerning Castle Point Borough Council's handling of a Freedom of Information request. For part 1 of the request (emails between named individuals), the ICO found the council does not hold the requested information. For part 2 (email chains), the ICO determined the council is entitled to withhold personal data under section 40 for Email Chain 1 and part of Email Chain 2, but must disclose remaining information in Email Chain 2 since no exemption was cited.
What changed
The ICO determined that Castle Point Borough Council does not hold information within the scope of part 1 of the FOI request. Regarding part 2, the council identified two email chains as partially within scope, but the Commissioner found both fall within scope in their entirety. The council is entitled to rely on section 40 (third party personal information) to withhold all information in Email Chain 1 and part of Email Chain 2. However, for the remaining information in Email Chain 2 where no exemption was cited, disclosure is required.\n\nPublic authorities handling multi-part FOI requests should ensure exemptions are properly cited for all withheld information, as failure to do so may require disclosure upon complaint. Councils and other public bodies subject to FOIA should review their exemption application procedures to ensure comprehensive coverage of withheld material.
What to do next
- Monitor for updates regarding disclosure obligations under this Decision Notice
- Prepare to disclose remaining information in Email Chain 2 if no further appeal is lodged
Archived snapshot
Apr 14, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Castle Point Borough Council
- Date 8 April 2026
- Sector Local government
- Decision(s) FOI 1: Partly upheld, FOI 40: Not upheld The complainant submitted a three-part request to Castle Point Borough Council (the council) for emails exchanged between named individuals, together with copies of relevant agendas and meeting minutes. The complaint concerns the council’s handling of parts 1 and 2 of the request, which it initially refused under various provisions of section 40 (third party personal information) and section 41 (information provided in confidence) of FOIA. During the Commissioner’s investigation, the council advised that it does not hold information within the scope of part 1 of the request and confirmed that it relied on section 40 to withhold all of the information it had identified as falling within the scope of part 2 of the request. The council said it considered that the exemption in section 36 (prejudice to the effective conduct of public affairs) was also applicable to some of the information held in relation to part 2 of the request. The Commissioner is satisfied that, on the balance of probabilities, the council does not hold information falling within the scope of part 1 of the request. The council identified two email chains (Email Chain 1 and Email Chain 2) as falling within the scope of part 2 of the request, but only in part. The Commissioner finds that both email chains fall within scope in their entirety. The Commissioner has decided that the council is entitled to rely on section 40 to withhold all of the information contained within Email Chain 1, and part of the information in Email Chain 2. As the council has not cited any exemption in respect of the remaining information in Email Chain 2, that information must be disclosed.
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for ICO Decision Notices
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from ICO.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when ICO Decision Notices publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.