Brent EIR Complaint Dismissed Over Bobby Moore Bridge
Summary
The Information Commissioner's Office dismissed a complaint against London Borough of Brent regarding an Environmental Information Regulations request. The complainant sought information about the awarding of an advertising contract concerning the Bobby Moore Bridge. The ICO found that the council was entitled to withhold the information under regulation 12(4)(e) (internal communications exception) and that the public interest favoured maintaining the exception. No further action is required from the council.
What changed
The ICO determined that London Borough of Brent correctly applied regulation 12(4)(e) of the Environmental Information Regulations to withhold information about the awarding of an advertising contract for the Bobby Moore Bridge. The council provided some background information but cited the internal communications exception for withheld material. The Commissioner found the balance of public interest favours maintaining the exception.
Public authorities handling EIR requests should note that internal communications may be withheld under regulation 12(4)(e) where the public interest in withholding outweighs disclosure. However, this was a fact-specific determination. The decision sets no new precedent but confirms the ICO's approach to applying the internal communications exception to commercial contract information.
What to do next
- No action required - complaint dismissed
Archived snapshot
Apr 8, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
London Borough of Brent
- Date 2 April 2026
- Sector Local government
- Decision(s) EIR 12(4)(e): Not upheld The complainant requested information about the awarding of an advertising contract concerning the Bobby Moore Bridge. London Borough of Brent (the council) provided some background information but cited regulation 12(4)(e) (internal communications) of the EIR to withhold further information. The Commissioner’s decision is that the council was entitled to apply regulation 12(4)(e) to withhold information in scope of the request, and the balance of the public interest favours maintaining the exception. The Commissioner does not require any steps as a result of this decision.
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for ICO Decision Notices
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from ICO.
The plain-English summary, classification, and "what to do next" steps are AI-generated from the original text. Cite the source document, not the AI analysis.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when ICO Decision Notices publishes new changes.