Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Wolf Trust Appeal Dismissed, Hawaii Intermediat...
Routine Enforcement Amended Final

Wolf Trust Appeal Dismissed, Hawaii Intermediate Court

Favicon for www.courts.state.hi.us Hawaii Supreme Court
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals dismissed Kanani Ann Wolf's appeal in the Phyllis Ann Wolf Revocable Living Trust matter, case number CAAP-26-0000002, for failure to file the required statement of jurisdiction and opening brief by the deadlines of March 2 and March 31, 2026 respectively, despite receiving a default notice on April 9, 2026. The court also granted attorney Laya Omar Farooq Dudley's withdrawal from representing Respondent-Appellee Mele Jean Strickland after finding adequate grounds, while denying without prejudice attorney Brian C. Zuanich's motion to withdraw as counsel for Wolf because service by email is not an accepted form of service.

Published by HICA on courts.state.hi.us . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

GovPing monitors Hawaii Supreme Court for new courts & legal regulatory changes. Every update since tracking began is archived, classified, and available as free RSS or email alerts — 137 changes logged to date.

What changed

The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals granted Laya Omar Farooq Dudley's withdrawal from representing Respondent-Appellee Mele Jean Strickland in the Phyllis Ann Wolf Revocable Living Trust appeal, case number CAAP-26-0000002, after finding adequate grounds for the request. The court denied without prejudice attorney Brian C. Zuanich's motion to withdraw as counsel for Petitioner-Appellant Kanani Ann Wolf because email service is not an accepted form of service under HRAP Rule 25(c) and HRCP Rule 5(b). The court also dismissed Kanani Ann Wolf's appeal for failure to file the required statement of jurisdiction and opening brief despite the appellate clerk's April 9, 2026 default notice and an April 20, 2026 court date for appropriate action.\n\nLitigants in appellate proceedings should ensure timely filing of all required documents and use accepted service methods for motions to avoid dismissal or denial of procedural requests.

Archived snapshot

Apr 25, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

ʻ Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-26-0000002 24-APR-2026 01:17 PM Dkt. 25 ORD NO. CAAP-26-0000002 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI IN THE MATTER OF THE PHYLLIS ANN WOLF REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, DATED JULY 9, 1999, AS AMENDED. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 2CTR-24-0000014) ORDER AND ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Hiraoka and Gluck, JJ.) Upon consideration of Melissa H. Lambert's (Lambert) March 20, 2026 Notice of Disassociation of Counsel for Respondent-Appellee Mele Jean Strickland [(Strickland)], Trustee for the Phyllis Ann Wolf Revocable Living Trust Dated July 9, 1999 (Notice), which the court construes as a motion to withdraw as counsel, under Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 50(a), Brian C. Zuanich's (Zuanich) April 19, 2026 Motion to Withdraw as Appellate Counsel (Motion), the papers in support, and the record, it appears that: (1) Strickland is represented in this appeal by Lambert and Laya Omar Farooq Dudley (Dudley) of Carlsmith Ball LLP;

(2) The Notice states Dudley is no longer affiliated with Carlsmith Ball and Lambert will continue to represent Strickland; (3) An attorney moving to withdraw as counsel of record "must show that notice of the motion was given by service upon the attorney's client." HRAP Rule 50(a); (4) The Notice does not specify whether Strickland was informed of the withdrawal of counsel. Nonetheless, the court will allow Dudley to withdraw, but require Lambert to demonstrate service of the Notice upon Strickland; (5) In the Motion, Zuanich seeks to withdraw as counsel for Petitioner-Appellant Kanani Ann Wolf, because Kanani Wolf terminated Zuanich's representation. Zuanich states he served the Motion on Kanani Wolf by email, which is not an accepted form of service. See HRAP Rule 25(c); Hawaiʻi Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 5(b) (incorporated into HRAP via HRAP Rule 2.1(a)). Thus, the court will deny the Motion; (6) The statement of jurisdiction and opening brief were due on or before March 2, 2026, and March 31, 2026, respectively; (7) Kanani Wolf failed to file either document, or request an extension of time; (8) On April 9, 2026, the appellate clerk entered a default notice informing Kanani Wolf's counsel that the time for filing the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the court's attention on April 20, 2026, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of the appeal, under HRAP Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and Kanani Wolf could request relief from default by motion; and (9) Kanani Wolf has not taken any further action in this appeal.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Notice, construed as a motion to withdraw as counsel, is granted. Within ten days from the date of this order, Lambert shall file a declaration, affidavit, or certificate of service indicating the Notice was provided to Strickland, or that Strickland was otherwise informed of Dudley's withdrawal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion is denied without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, April 24, 2026. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Presiding Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Daniel M. Gluck Associate Judge

Get daily alerts for Hawaii Supreme Court

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from HICA.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
HICA
Filed
April 24th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Branch
Judicial
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
CAAP-26-0000002
Docket
CAAP-26-0000002

Who this affects

Applies to
Courts Legal professionals
Industry sector
9211 Government & Public Administration
Activity scope
Civil appellate procedure
Geographic scope
US-HI US-HI

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Employment & Labor

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Hawaii Supreme Court publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!