Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal United States v. Joshua Tyree - Criminal Appeal
Routine Enforcement Amended Final

United States v. Joshua Tyree - Criminal Appeal

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com 11th Circuit Published Opinions (CourtListener)
Filed March 18th, 2026
Detected March 18th, 2026
Email

Summary

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals granted counsel's motion to withdraw in the case of United States v. Joshua Tyree. The court affirmed the defendant's convictions and sentence after an independent review found no arguable issues of merit in the appeal.

What changed

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a non-precedential opinion in the criminal appeal case United States v. Joshua Tyree (Docket No. 25-10324). The court granted the appointed counsel's motion to withdraw, finding that the appeal lacked arguable issues of merit after an independent review of the record. Consequently, the defendant's convictions and sentence were affirmed.

This ruling signifies the conclusion of the direct criminal appeal for Joshua Tyree. For legal professionals involved in criminal appeals, this case serves as an example of the application of Anders v. California standards for withdrawal of counsel when an appeal is deemed without merit. There are no immediate compliance actions required for regulated entities, as this is a specific case resolution.

Source document (simplified)

Jump To

Top Caption Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 18, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

United States v. Joshua Tyree

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Combined Opinion

USCA11 Case: 25-10324 Document: 47-1 Date Filed: 03/18/2026 Page: 1 of 2

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

In the
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit


No. 25-10324
Non-Argument Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

JOSHUA LEON TYREE,
Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
D.C. Docket No. 2:24-cr-00035-SPC-NPM-1


Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Joshua Tyree in
this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
USCA11 Case: 25-10324 Document: 47-1 Date Filed: 03/18/2026 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 25- 10324

U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record re-
veals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record re-
veals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Tyree’s convictions and sentence are
AFFIRMED.

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
11th Circuit
Filed
March 18th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals Criminal defendants
Geographic scope
National (US)

Taxonomy

Primary area
Criminal Justice
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Appellate Procedure

Get Courts & Legal alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when 11th Circuit Published Opinions (CourtListener) publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.