Under Armour v. Shapellx - INNER ARMOR Trademark Opposition Sustained
Summary
The USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) sustained Opposition No. TTAB91296595, with Under Armour, Inc. prevailing against Shapellx Us Inc over the 'INNER ARMOR' trademark. The decision prevents Shapellx from registering the contested mark, likely due to likelihood of confusion with Under Armour's existing ARMOR marks.
What changed
The TTAB issued a final decision sustaining Under Armour's opposition against Shapellx's trademark application for 'INNER ARMOR' (Serial No. 91296595). Under Armour, the established athletic apparel company with existing ARMOR-formative marks, successfully argued that Shapellx's mark would cause consumer confusion. The opposition was filed on January 29, 2025, and the decision was issued on March 30, 2026.
For trademark practitioners and brand managers, this case underscores the importance of thorough clearance searches before adopting new marks and active monitoring of competing applications. Companies seeking trademark registration should ensure their marks do not create a likelihood of confusion with established brands, particularly those with portfolio protection in similar goods classes. Shapellx may appeal to the Federal Circuit or refile under a modified mark.
Source document (simplified)
Opposition: INNER ARMOR
Opposition TTAB91296595-20260330 Kind: OPP Mar 30, 2026
Abstract
BD DECISION: OPP SUSTAINED
Plaintiff: Under Armour, Inc.
Defendant: Shapellx Us Inc
Mark at issue: INNER ARMOR
Filing Date
2025-01-29
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when ChangeBridge: TTAB Proceedings publishes new changes.