Jump To

Top Caption Syllabus [Combined Opinion

                  by Judge John Tyson](https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10810280/state-v-watson/#o1)

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 18, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

State v. Watson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

• Citations: None known
• Docket Number: 25-694

• Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

• Opinion

• Authorities (1)

• Cited By (0)

• Summaries (0)

• Similar Cases (0)

• PDF

Syllabus

Multiple First-degree murders; Minor sentenced to life w/o possibility of parole; Miller v. Alabama; N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-1340.19A; N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-1340.19C; Conceded Error

Combined Opinion

                        by [John Marsh Tyson](https://www.courtlistener.com/person/8038/john-marsh-tyson/)

An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute
controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with
the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. COA25-694

Filed 18 March 2026

Guilford County, Nos. 97CR060134-400, 97CR060135-400

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v.

STEVEN ANTWONE WATSON

Appeal by defendant from judgment entered 11 March 2025, by Judge Tonia

A. Cutchin in Guilford County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 24

February 2026.

Attorney General Jeff Jackson by Assistant Attorney General Caden William
Hayes, for the State.

Appellate Defender Glenn Gerding by Assistant Appellate Defender John F.
Carella, for the defendant-appellant.

TYSON, Judge.

Steven Atwone Watson (“Defendant”) appeals from order entered following a

hearing pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.19A, et seq. (2025) and Miller v.

Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 183 L. Ed. 2d 407 (2012), which held the imposition of

Defendant’s two consecutive life sentences without the possibility of parole on a

juvenile should not be modified to life with the possibility of parole. The State
STATE V. WATSON

Opinion of the Court

concedes error, and we vacate and remand for resentencing.

I. Background

Defendant was convicted of two counts of first-degree murders based upon

premeditation and deliberation and under the felony murder rule by a jury on 16

April 1999. Defendant was seventeen years old at the time of the crimes. Defendant

was sentenced to two terms of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.

Defendant appealed to this Court as of right. A prior panel of this Court found no

error by unpublished opinion. See State v. Watson, 144 N.C. App. 451, 548 S.E.2d

582 (2001) (unpublished). The trial court amended the judgment to have both life

sentences to run consecutively.

The trial court held a resentencing hearing pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-

1340.19A, et seq. (2025) and Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460, 183 L. Ed. 2d 407 (2012)

and held the imposition of two consecutive life sentences without the possibility of

parole for Defendant did not violate the Eight Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and

unusual punishment. Defendant appeals.

II. Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction lies in this court pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat § 7A-27(b) (2025).

III. Issues

Defendant argues the trial court erred by: (1) failing to issue a written order,

which includes adequate findings regarding the presence or absence of mitigating

factors, in compliance with the mandates of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.19C (2025);

-2-
STATE V. WATSON

Opinion of the Court

and, (2) violating Defendant’s Eighth Amendment rights by imposing the most severe

punishment. Additionally, Defendant argues his Sixth Amendment rights were

violated by the ineffective assistance of counsel (“IAC”).

IV. Analysis

Defendant argues and the State concedes the superior court’s written Miller

resentencing order did not contain the findings as required by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-

1340.19C(a) (2025), which requires a sentencing court to “include findings on the

absence or presence of any mitigating factors” from the list provided in N.C. Gen.

Stat. § 15A-1340.19B(c) (2025). A prior panel of this Court has held this language “is

a mandate to trial judges, and . . . failure to comply with the statutory mandate is [a]

reversible error.” State v. Antone, 240 N.C. App. 408, 410, 770 S.E.2d 128, 130 (2015)

(citation omitted).

In light of this decision, we need not reach Defendant’s remaining Eighth

Amendment and IAC arguments.

V. Conclusion

Under the express terms of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.19C (2025) and Antone,

the superior court’s written order was inadequate. The order of the trial court

appealed from is vacated, and the cause is remanded for a new resentencing hearing

consistent with Miller and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1340.19C (2025). It is so ordered.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Judges GRIFFIN and FLOOD concur.

-3-
STATE V. WATSON

Opinion of the Court

Report per Rule 30(e).

-4-