State v. Jones - Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Jurisdiction and Standing

Jump To

Top Caption Syllabus Combined Opinion The text of this document was obtained by analyzing a scanned document and may have typos.

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

April 22, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

State v. Jones

Ohio Court of Appeals

• Citations: 2026 Ohio 1448
• Docket Number: 2026-A-0019

• Judges: Patton

• Opinion

• Authorities (6)

• Cited By (0)

• Summaries (0)

• Similar Cases (0)

• PDF

Syllabus

APPELLATE REVIEW - R.C. 2505.02(B); appeal from motion to disclose exculpatory evidence is not a final appealable order; interlocutory appeal; lack of jurisdiction.

Combined Opinion

[Cite as State v. Jones, 2026-Ohio-1448.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
ASHTABULA COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2026-A-0019

Plaintiff-Appellee,
Criminal Appeal from the
- vs - Court of Common Pleas

ODRAYE G. JONES a.k.a.
MALIK ALLAH-U-AKBAR, Trial Court No. 1997 CR 00221

Defendant-Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

Decided: April 22, 2026
Judgment: Appeal dismissed

Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General, Kara Keating, Daniel Kasaris, and Erik Spitzer,
Special Prosecutors, 30 E. Broad Street, 23rd Floor, Columbus, OH 43215 (For Plaintiff-
Appellee).

Odraye G. Jones, pro se, Ashtabula County Jail, 25 W. Jefferson Street, Jefferson, OH
44047 (Defendant-Appellant).

ROBERT J. PATTON, J.

{¶1} Appellant, Odraye G. Jones (“Jones”), filed a pro se appeal from an April 2,

2026, judgment entry regarding Jones’s motion to disclose exculpatory evidence.

Appellee, the State of Ohio (“State”), filed a motion to strike the notice of appeal. The

State has also filed a motion for emergency stay of trial court proceedings pending our

decision on their previously filed motion to strike. We note that the Ashtabula County

Court of Common Pleas is scheduled to empanel a jury for the resentencing phase in the

underlying case on April 23, 2026, where Jones is represented by counsel.
{¶2} Since this court may only entertain those appeals from final judgments, we

must determine whether there is a final appealable order. Noble v. Colwell, 44 Ohio St.3d

92, 96 (1989). A trial court’s judgment can be immediately reviewed by an appellate court

only if it constitutes a “final order” in the action. Ohio Const., art. IV, § 3(B)(2); Radic v.

Sternadel, 2025-Ohio-4527, ¶ 2 (11th Dist.). If a lower court’s judgment is not final, then

this court does not have jurisdiction to review the case, and the case must be dismissed.

Gen. Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 44 Ohio St.3d 17, 20 (1989).

{¶3} R.C. 2505.02(B) defines a “final order” and sets forth nine categories of

appealable judgments, and if a trial court’s judgment satisfies any of them, it will be

deemed a “final order” and can be immediately appealed and reviewed. In this case, the

April 2, 2026 judgment entry being appealed does not fit within any of the categories for

being a final order under R.C. 2505.02(B) and did not dispose of all claims.

{¶4} The trial court’s ruling merely addressed appellant’s motion for disclosure

and, in substance, reiterated the state’s ongoing obligation to comply with its discovery

duties. Such a ruling is interlocutory in nature and does not determine the action, prevent

a judgment, or affect a substantial right in a manner that would foreclose appropriate relief

in a subsequent appeal.

{¶5} Accordingly, because the challenged entry neither disposes of the case nor

fits within any statutory category of a final, appealable order, it remains an interlocutory

ruling over which this court lacks jurisdiction. In the absence of a final order, the appeal

must be dismissed. Gen. Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 44 Ohio St.3d 17, 20 (1989).

{¶6} Assuming arguendo the April 2, 2026, judgment entry was final and

appealable, we conclude that Jones lacks standing to challenge the entry for lack of

PAGE 2 OF 4

Case No. 2026-A-0019
aggrievement. “It is a fundamental rule that to be entitled to institute appeal or error

proceedings a person must have a present interest in the subject-matter of the litigation

and must be aggrieved or prejudiced by the judgment[.]” Ohio Contract Carriers Ass'n v.

Pub. Utilities Comm., 140 Ohio St. 160, 161 (1942). “Without standing, a party’s appeal

must be dismissed.” Reese v. Reese, 2019-Ohio-2810, ¶ 8 (1st Dist.).

{¶7} This principle applies with equal force in criminal cases. See State ex rel.

Richardson v. Suster, 130 Ohio St.3d 82, fn. 1, (2011) (holding that a criminal defendant

lacked standing to challenge a portion of a ruling that granted him relief, explaining that a

party is not aggrieved by a favorable order even if he disputes the reasoning underlying

it.)

{¶8} Here, the trial court granted Jones’s request for disclosure of exculpatory

evidence, albeit noting that Jones failed to specify what evidence had not yet been turned

over. The trial court explicitly reminded the State of its continuing obligation to disclose

evidence that is material to punishment in this matter. In other words, the result was

favorable to Jones. As Jones has not been adversely affected or prejudiced by the order

from which he appeals, he is not an aggrieved party. Accordingly, he lacks standing to

invoke this court’s jurisdiction, and the appeal must be dismissed.

{¶9} Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction.

Having fully disposed of this case, the State’s motion to strike the notice of appeal and

motion for emergency stay are overruled as moot.

MATT LYNCH, P.J.,

EUGENE A. LUCCI, J.,

concur.

PAGE 3 OF 4

Case No. 2026-A-0019
JUDGMENT ENTRY

For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of this court, it is ordered that
the appeal is hereby dismissed, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions
are overruled as moot.
Costs to be taxed against Appellant.

The Clerk of Courts is hereby instructed to serve a copy of this entry to the following:

1. Appellant, Ashtabula County Jail, 25 W. Jefferson St. Jefferson,
   Ohio 44047;

2. Trial counsel, Attorney Donald J. Malarcik, 121 S. Main St., Suite
   520, Akron, OH 44308 and The Ashtabula County Public
   Defender’s Office, 22 East Jefferson St., Jefferson, OH 44047;

3. The Ashtabula County Prosecutor’s Office, 25 W. Jefferson St.,
   Jefferson, Ohio 44047;

4. Special Prosecutors, Attys. Kara Keating, Daniel Kasaris, and Erik
   Spitzer, E. Broad Street, 23rd Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215; and

5. Judge David A. Schroeder, Chambers.

JUDGE ROBERT J. PATTON

PRESIDING JUDGE MATT LYNCH,
concurs

JUDGE EUGENE A. LUCCI,
concurs
THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES A FINAL JUDGMENT ENTRY

A certified copy of this opinion and judgment entry shall constitute the mandate
pursuant to Rule 27 of the Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure.

PAGE 4 OF 4

Case No. 2026-A-0019