Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal State v. Jones - Appeal Dismissed, No Final App...
Routine Enforcement Amended Final

State v. Jones - Appeal Dismissed, No Final Appealable Order

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The Ohio Court of Appeals, Eleventh District dismissed defendant Odraye G. Jones's pro se appeal from the Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas, holding that the trial court's March 13, 2026 judgment denying Jones's motion to dismiss death penalty specifications was an interlocutory order and not a final appealable order under R.C. 2505.02(B). The appellate court concluded it lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal on April 22, 2026; all pending motions were overruled as moot.

“In the absence of a final order, the appeal must be dismissed.”

Published by OH Courts on courtlistener.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

The Ohio Court of Appeals is the state's intermediate appellate court, organized into 12 districts. Around 305 opinions a month, covering civil, criminal, family, probate, and administrative cases. Ohio is a commercially significant state with heavy manufacturing, insurance, and healthcare sectors, and its appellate precedent shapes commercial practice across the midwest. GovPing tracks every published opinion via CourtListener's mirror, with case name, parties, district, and outcome. Watch this if you litigate in Ohio, follow medical malpractice and insurance defense trends, advise on Ohio's consumer protection and landlord-tenant statutes, or track Daubert expert challenges moving through the state appellate system.

What changed

The court held that a trial court ruling denying a motion to dismiss death penalty specifications constitutes an interlocutory order that does not determine the action, prevent a judgment, or affect a substantial right in a manner qualifying as a final order under R.C. 2505.02(B). Accordingly, the appellate court lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal. All pending motions in the appeal were overruled as moot.

For criminal defense practitioners in Ohio, this decision underscores that interlocutory rulings on the sufficiency or dismissal of death penalty specifications at the trial court level cannot be immediately appealed absent a specific statutory basis under R.C. 2505.02(B); the proper avenue is typically an appeal following final judgment or pursuit of extraordinary writ relief.

Archived snapshot

Apr 23, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Jump To

Top Caption Syllabus Combined Opinion The text of this document was obtained by analyzing a scanned document and may have typos.

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

April 22, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

State v. Jones

Ohio Court of Appeals

Syllabus

APPELLATE REVIEW - R.C. 2505.02(B); appeal from motion to dismiss death penalty specifications is not a final appealable order; interlocutory appeal; lack of jurisdiction.

Combined Opinion

[Cite as State v. Jones, 2026-Ohio-1447.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
ASHTABULA COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2026-A-0016

Plaintiff-Appellee,
Criminal Appeal from the
- vs - Court of Common Pleas

ODRAYE G. JONES a.k.a.
MALIK ALLAH-U-AKBAR, Trial Court No. 1997 CR 00221

Defendant-Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

Decided: April 22, 2026
Judgment: Appeal dismissed

Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General, Kara Keating, Daniel Kasaris, and Erik Spitzer,
Special Prosecutors, 30 E. Broad Street, 23rd Floor, Columbus, OH 43215 (For Plaintiff-
Appellee).

Odraye G. Jones, pro se, Ashtabula County Jail, 25 W. Jefferson Street, Jefferson, OH
44047 (Defendant-Appellant).

ROBERT J. PATTON, J.

{¶1} Appellant, Odraye G. Jones (“Jones”), filed the instant pro se appeal on April

6, 2026. Jones seeks to appeal from a March 13, 2026 judgment entry denying Jones’s

February 12, 2026 Motion to Dismiss Second Specification and his Supplemental Motion

to Dismiss Second Specification filed on March 3, 2026. On April 9, 2026, appellee, the

State of Ohio (“State”), filed a motion to strike the notice of appeal. Neither Jones nor his

trial counsel filed a response in opposition to the State’s motion.

{¶2} Subsequently, on April 21, 2026, the State filed a motion for emergency stay

of trial court proceedings while this appeal is pending. We note that the Ashtabula County
Court of Common Pleas is scheduled to empanel a jury for the resentencing phase in the

underlying case on April 23, 2026, where Jones is represented by counsel.

{¶3} Upon review of the notice of appeal and the judgment entry at issue, we

conclude, sua sponte, that this court is without jurisdiction to consider this appeal.

{¶4} Since this court may only entertain those appeals from final judgments, we

must determine whether there is a final appealable order. Noble v. Colwell, 44 Ohio St.3d

92, 96 (1989). A trial court’s judgment can be immediately reviewed by an appellate court

only if it constitutes a “final order” in the action. Ohio Const., art. IV, § 3(B)(2); Radic v.

Sternadel, 2025-Ohio-4527, ¶ 2 (11th Dist.). If a lower court’s judgment is not final, then

this court does not have jurisdiction to review the case, and the case must be dismissed.

Gen. Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 44 Ohio St.3d 17, 20 (1989).

{¶5} R.C. 2505.02(B) defines a “final order” and sets forth nine categories of

appealable judgments, and if a trial court’s judgment satisfies any of them, it will be

deemed a “final order” and can be immediately appealed and reviewed. In this case, the

April 2, 2026 judgment entry being appealed does not fit within any of the categories for

being a final order under R.C. 2505.02(B) and did not dispose of all claims.

{¶6} The March 13, 2026 entry does not constitute a final order under R.C.

2505.02(B). A ruling denying a motion to dismiss the indictment including specifications

within the indictment is an interlocutory order that does not constitute a final, appealable

order. State v. Mitchell, 2017-Ohio-94, ¶ 11 (8th Dist.); State v. Crawley, 96 Ohio App.3d

149, 155 (12th Dist. 1994), citing State v. Hawkins, 30 Ohio App.3d 259, 260 (8th Dist.

1986).

{¶7} Here, the trial court denied Jones’s request to dismiss the death penalty

specifications of the indictment. Such ruling is interlocutory and does not determine the
PAGE 2 OF 4

Case No. 2026-A-0016
action, prevent a judgment, or affect a substantial right in a manner that would foreclose

appropriate relief in a subsequent appeal. As the challenged entry neither disposes of the

case nor fits within any statutory category of a final, appealable order, it remains an

interlocutory ruling over which this court lacks jurisdiction. In the absence of a final order,

the appeal must be dismissed.

{¶8} Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Furthermore, all

pending motions are overruled as moot.

MATT LYNCH, P.J.,

EUGENE A. LUCCI, J.,

concur.

PAGE 3 OF 4

Case No. 2026-A-0016
JUDGMENT ENTRY

For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of this court, it is ordered that
the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are overruled
as moot.
Costs to be taxed against Appellant.

The Clerk of Courts is hereby instructed to serve a copy of this entry to the following:

  1. Appellant, Ashtabula County Jail, 25 W. Jefferson St. Jefferson, Ohio
    44047;

  2. Trial counsel, Attorney Donald J. Malarcik, 121 S. Main St., Suite
    520, Akron, OH 44308 and The Ashtabula County Public Defender’s
    Office, 22 East Jefferson St., Jefferson, OH 44047;

  3. The Ashtabula County Prosecutor’s Office, 25 W. Jefferson St.,
    Jefferson, Ohio 44047;

  4. Special Prosecutors, Attys. Kara Keating, Daniel Kasaris, and Erik
    Spitzer, 30 E. Broad Street, 23rd Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215; and

  5. Judge David A. Schroeder, Chambers.

JUDGE ROBERT J. PATTON

PRESIDING JUDGE MATT LYNCH,
concurs

JUDGE EUGENE A. LUCCI,
concurs
THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES A FINAL JUDGMENT ENTRY

A certified copy of this opinion and judgment entry shall constitute the mandate
pursuant to Rule 27 of the Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure.

PAGE 4 OF 4

Case No. 2026-A-0016

Named provisions

R.C. 2505.02(B)

Get daily alerts for Ohio Court of Appeals

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from OH Courts.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
OH Courts
Filed
April 22nd, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Branch
Judicial
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Document ID
2026 Ohio 1447
Docket
2026-A-0016 1997 CR 00221

Who this affects

Applies to
Criminal defendants Courts
Industry sector
9211 Government & Public Administration
Activity scope
Criminal appeals Appellate jurisdiction
Geographic scope
US-OH US-OH

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Criminal Justice Judicial Administration

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Ohio Court of Appeals publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!