State v. Jones - Appeal Dismissed, No Final Appealable Order
Summary
The Ohio Court of Appeals, Eleventh District dismissed defendant Odraye G. Jones's pro se appeal from the Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas, holding that the trial court's March 13, 2026 judgment denying Jones's motion to dismiss death penalty specifications was an interlocutory order and not a final appealable order under R.C. 2505.02(B). The appellate court concluded it lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal on April 22, 2026; all pending motions were overruled as moot.
“In the absence of a final order, the appeal must be dismissed.”
About this source
The Ohio Court of Appeals is the state's intermediate appellate court, organized into 12 districts. Around 305 opinions a month, covering civil, criminal, family, probate, and administrative cases. Ohio is a commercially significant state with heavy manufacturing, insurance, and healthcare sectors, and its appellate precedent shapes commercial practice across the midwest. GovPing tracks every published opinion via CourtListener's mirror, with case name, parties, district, and outcome. Watch this if you litigate in Ohio, follow medical malpractice and insurance defense trends, advise on Ohio's consumer protection and landlord-tenant statutes, or track Daubert expert challenges moving through the state appellate system.
What changed
The court held that a trial court ruling denying a motion to dismiss death penalty specifications constitutes an interlocutory order that does not determine the action, prevent a judgment, or affect a substantial right in a manner qualifying as a final order under R.C. 2505.02(B). Accordingly, the appellate court lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal. All pending motions in the appeal were overruled as moot.
For criminal defense practitioners in Ohio, this decision underscores that interlocutory rulings on the sufficiency or dismissal of death penalty specifications at the trial court level cannot be immediately appealed absent a specific statutory basis under R.C. 2505.02(B); the proper avenue is typically an appeal following final judgment or pursuit of extraordinary writ relief.
Archived snapshot
Apr 23, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Jump To
Top Caption Syllabus Combined Opinion The text of this document was obtained by analyzing a scanned document and may have typos.
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
April 22, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
State v. Jones
Ohio Court of Appeals
- Citations: 2026 Ohio 1447
- Docket Number: 2026-A-0016
Judges: Patton
Syllabus
APPELLATE REVIEW - R.C. 2505.02(B); appeal from motion to dismiss death penalty specifications is not a final appealable order; interlocutory appeal; lack of jurisdiction.
Combined Opinion
[Cite as State v. Jones, 2026-Ohio-1447.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
ASHTABULA COUNTY
STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2026-A-0016
Plaintiff-Appellee,
Criminal Appeal from the
- vs - Court of Common Pleas
ODRAYE G. JONES a.k.a.
MALIK ALLAH-U-AKBAR, Trial Court No. 1997 CR 00221
Defendant-Appellant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
Decided: April 22, 2026
Judgment: Appeal dismissed
Dave Yost, Ohio Attorney General, Kara Keating, Daniel Kasaris, and Erik Spitzer,
Special Prosecutors, 30 E. Broad Street, 23rd Floor, Columbus, OH 43215 (For Plaintiff-
Appellee).
Odraye G. Jones, pro se, Ashtabula County Jail, 25 W. Jefferson Street, Jefferson, OH
44047 (Defendant-Appellant).
ROBERT J. PATTON, J.
{¶1} Appellant, Odraye G. Jones (“Jones”), filed the instant pro se appeal on April
6, 2026. Jones seeks to appeal from a March 13, 2026 judgment entry denying Jones’s
February 12, 2026 Motion to Dismiss Second Specification and his Supplemental Motion
to Dismiss Second Specification filed on March 3, 2026. On April 9, 2026, appellee, the
State of Ohio (“State”), filed a motion to strike the notice of appeal. Neither Jones nor his
trial counsel filed a response in opposition to the State’s motion.
{¶2} Subsequently, on April 21, 2026, the State filed a motion for emergency stay
of trial court proceedings while this appeal is pending. We note that the Ashtabula County
Court of Common Pleas is scheduled to empanel a jury for the resentencing phase in the
underlying case on April 23, 2026, where Jones is represented by counsel.
{¶3} Upon review of the notice of appeal and the judgment entry at issue, we
conclude, sua sponte, that this court is without jurisdiction to consider this appeal.
{¶4} Since this court may only entertain those appeals from final judgments, we
must determine whether there is a final appealable order. Noble v. Colwell, 44 Ohio St.3d
92, 96 (1989). A trial court’s judgment can be immediately reviewed by an appellate court
only if it constitutes a “final order” in the action. Ohio Const., art. IV, § 3(B)(2); Radic v.
Sternadel, 2025-Ohio-4527, ¶ 2 (11th Dist.). If a lower court’s judgment is not final, then
this court does not have jurisdiction to review the case, and the case must be dismissed.
Gen. Acc. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 44 Ohio St.3d 17, 20 (1989).
{¶5} R.C. 2505.02(B) defines a “final order” and sets forth nine categories of
appealable judgments, and if a trial court’s judgment satisfies any of them, it will be
deemed a “final order” and can be immediately appealed and reviewed. In this case, the
April 2, 2026 judgment entry being appealed does not fit within any of the categories for
being a final order under R.C. 2505.02(B) and did not dispose of all claims.
{¶6} The March 13, 2026 entry does not constitute a final order under R.C.
2505.02(B). A ruling denying a motion to dismiss the indictment including specifications
within the indictment is an interlocutory order that does not constitute a final, appealable
order. State v. Mitchell, 2017-Ohio-94, ¶ 11 (8th Dist.); State v. Crawley, 96 Ohio App.3d
149, 155 (12th Dist. 1994), citing State v. Hawkins, 30 Ohio App.3d 259, 260 (8th Dist.
1986).
{¶7} Here, the trial court denied Jones’s request to dismiss the death penalty
specifications of the indictment. Such ruling is interlocutory and does not determine the
PAGE 2 OF 4
Case No. 2026-A-0016
action, prevent a judgment, or affect a substantial right in a manner that would foreclose
appropriate relief in a subsequent appeal. As the challenged entry neither disposes of the
case nor fits within any statutory category of a final, appealable order, it remains an
interlocutory ruling over which this court lacks jurisdiction. In the absence of a final order,
the appeal must be dismissed.
{¶8} Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Furthermore, all
pending motions are overruled as moot.
MATT LYNCH, P.J.,
EUGENE A. LUCCI, J.,
concur.
PAGE 3 OF 4
Case No. 2026-A-0016
JUDGMENT ENTRY
For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of this court, it is ordered that
the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are overruled
as moot.
Costs to be taxed against Appellant.
The Clerk of Courts is hereby instructed to serve a copy of this entry to the following:
Appellant, Ashtabula County Jail, 25 W. Jefferson St. Jefferson, Ohio
44047;Trial counsel, Attorney Donald J. Malarcik, 121 S. Main St., Suite
520, Akron, OH 44308 and The Ashtabula County Public Defender’s
Office, 22 East Jefferson St., Jefferson, OH 44047;The Ashtabula County Prosecutor’s Office, 25 W. Jefferson St.,
Jefferson, Ohio 44047;Special Prosecutors, Attys. Kara Keating, Daniel Kasaris, and Erik
Spitzer, 30 E. Broad Street, 23rd Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215; andJudge David A. Schroeder, Chambers.
JUDGE ROBERT J. PATTON
PRESIDING JUDGE MATT LYNCH,
concurs
JUDGE EUGENE A. LUCCI,
concurs
THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTES A FINAL JUDGMENT ENTRY
A certified copy of this opinion and judgment entry shall constitute the mandate
pursuant to Rule 27 of the Ohio Rules of Appellate Procedure.
PAGE 4 OF 4
Case No. 2026-A-0016
Named provisions
Parties
Related changes
Get daily alerts for Ohio Court of Appeals
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from OH Courts.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Ohio Court of Appeals publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.