State v. Howard - Criminal Appeal Dismissed as Frivolous
Summary
The Twelfth District Ohio Court of Appeals dismissed a frivolous criminal appeal filed by Shiviez Montrel Howard. Under Anders v. California procedures, appellate counsel filed a brief indicating no arguable errors and requesting permission to withdraw. The court independently reviewed the record, found no prejudicial error, and dismissed the appeal.
What changed
The court addressed an Anders brief filed by appellant's counsel in a criminal appeal from Butler County Court of Common Pleas (Case No. CR2024-10-1513). Under Anders procedures, counsel certified that after reviewing the record, no errors were found that would support the appeal, listed two potential issues that might arguably support appeal, and requested permission to withdraw. The appellate court independently reviewed the record and found no prejudicial error.
This case establishes no new legal obligations for any party. The appeal was dismissed as wholly frivolous. No compliance actions are required by any party. This decision serves as an informational ruling confirming the underlying trial court proceedings were free from reversible error.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Syllabus Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
April 6, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
State v. Howard
Ohio Court of Appeals
- Citations: 2026 Ohio 1232
Docket Number: CA2025-07-073
Syllabus
Anders no error.
Combined Opinion
[Cite as State v. Howard, 2026-Ohio-1232.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
BUTLER COUNTY
:
STATE OF OHIO,
: CASE NO. CA2025-07-073
Appellee,
: DECISION AND
JUDGMENT ENTRY
- vs - : 4/6/2026
:
SHIVIEZ MONTREL HOWARD,
:
Appellant.
CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Case No. CR2024-10-1513
Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael Greer, Assistant
Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Christopher Frederick, for appellant.
DECISION
Per Curiam.
{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by
appellant, Shiviez Montrel Howard, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the
transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common
Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.
Butler CA2025-07-073
{¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record
from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the
rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists two
potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Id. at 744; (3) requests that this
court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from
prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests
permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly
frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been
served upon appellant.
{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response
having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error
prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel
for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed
for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER and SIEBERT, JJ., concur.
-2-
Butler CA2025-07-073
JUDGMENT ENTRY
The brief of appellant, filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
properly before this court and having been considered by the court, it is ordered that the
motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this
appeal is hereby dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to the Butler County Common Pleas
Court for execution upon this judgment and that a certified copy of this Decision and
Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27.
Costs to be taxed to appellant.
/s/ Robert A. Hendrickson, Presiding Judge
/s/ Robin N. Piper, Judge
/s/ Melena S. Siebert, Judge
-3-
Named provisions
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Ohio Court of Appeals publishes new changes.