Lammy Announces Six-Month Appeal Window for Undue Lenient Sentences
Summary
David Lammy, the Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary, has announced that victims and bereaved families will be given six months to challenge unduly lenient sentences under the Unduly Lenient Sentence (ULS) scheme, replacing the current 28-day limit. The government will also introduce a legal duty in the Victims' Code requiring notification of survivors about the scheme's existence. This change follows campaigning by families such as Tracey Hanson, whose appeal against her son's murderer was rejected for arriving at 8.40pm on the final day.
What changed
The government has announced plans to replace the 28-day time limit for challenging unduly lenient sentences with a six-month window under the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme. The scheme currently allows members of the public to refer sentences to the Attorney General and Solicitor General for potential Court of Appeal review. Additionally, the Victims' Code will be amended to include a legal duty to inform survivors about the existence of the scheme, addressing concerns that victims were not being made aware of their right to challenge.\n\nAffected parties including victims' families, criminal defendants, and the courts should prepare for changes to procedural timelines and notification requirements. Legal practitioners advising victims of crime should note the extended timeframe for filing ULS referrals and ensure clients are informed of their rights under the updated Victims' Code.
What to do next
- Monitor for legislative implementation of the six-month deadline
- Review updated Victims' Code requirements for notification duties
Archived snapshot
Apr 11, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Tracey Hanson and her daughter Brooke. Tracey campaigned for changes to the appeal system after her son Josh was murdered in a nightclub. Photograph: Linda Nylind/The Guardian
Tracey Hanson and her daughter Brooke. Tracey campaigned for changes to the appeal system after her son Josh was murdered in a nightclub. Photograph: Linda Nylind/The Guardian
Victims and bereaved families to get more time to challenge ‘unduly lenient’ sentences
David Lammy says those affected by a heinous crime cannot be expected to engage with the justice system within the existing 28-day limit
Rajeev Syal Home affairs editor
Wed 8 Apr 2026 17.30 EDT
Last modified on Wed 8 Apr 2026 21.30 EDT
Share Prefer the Guardian on Google
Victims and bereaved families will be given six months to challenge “unduly lenient” sentences handed to criminals, under changes announced by David Lammy.
Relatives of murder victims campaigned for the government to scrap the 28-day time limit to submit a formal request after an offender is sentenced.
Lammy, the lord chancellor and justice secretary, said the change was in recognition that in the immediate aftermath of a heinous crime, grieving families and traumatised victims cannot also be expected to engage with the justice system within a month.
The unduly lenient sentence scheme allows any member of the public to refer a sentence to the attorney general and the solicitor general – the government’s senior legal advisers – if they believe it is too lenient.
They can then request that the court of appeal review the sentence – a safeguard to help ensure the sentence reflect the seriousness of the offence.
Following concerns that victims and their families were not aware of the scheme, the government will also introduce a legal duty in the Victims’ Code to notify survivors of the existence of the scheme.
Tracey Hanson, who has campaigned for changes after her son Josh was murdered in a nightclub, welcomed the move. She had submitted an appeal to the attorney general in 2019 within the 28-day time limit to challenge the sentence. However, it arrived at 8.40pm on the last day and was deemed “outside court hours”.
She had not been told by her barrister, police, courts, nor victim support that she could appeal against a lenient sentence within 28 days of the judge jailing her son’s murderer, Shane O’Brien. He had been Britain’s most wanted man when he fled to Europe after the killing in a private plane chartered by a drug dealer.
David Lammy, the justice secretary, said scrapping the 28-day limit to challenge a sentence would allow bereaved families to ‘get the justice they deserve’. Photograph: Denis Balibouse/Reuters
Hanson said the change was a testament to her son’s memory after a seven-year campaign. “These changes represent a hard-fought victory in ensuring that families are no longer left in the dark or rushed through a traumatising process during the most painful moments of their lives,” she said.
Katie Brett, whose sister Sasha Marsden was 16 when she was raped, murdered and set on fire, said her family were not told that they had a right to challenge the sentence given to her killer until it was too late.
“It’s a relief that in Sasha’s memory, victims and their families will have six months to challenge an unduly lenient sentence and the new legal duty to be notified means every family will know their rights,” she said. “No family should ever be left in the dark like we were; every victim deserves support.”
The right to appeal against a sentence remains restricted to serious crimes tried in the crown court, such as murder, manslaughter, robbery, rape, stalking and most child sexual abuse offences. It excludes hundreds of other offences, including some sexual crimes, causing death by careless driving and burglary.
To push the changes through, ministers will table amendments to the victims and courts bill, which is progressing through parliament. Other members of the public will still have 28 days to refer a case under the scheme.
Lammy said: “When someone’s been through the ordeal of seeking justice and watched the person who hurt them or their loved one be sentenced, the last thing they should be worrying about is a ticking clock.
“People need time to breathe, to talk to their families, to get advice. This change means they’ll have more time to do this – and most importantly, get the justice they deserve.”
The shadow justice minister, Kieran Mullan, cautiously welcomed the move. “After months and months of voting down sensible proposals for reform, this is a step forward and reflects the strength of feeling from victims, families and campaigners who have been calling for change,” he said.
Explore more on these topics
- Sentencing
- UK criminal justice
- David Lammy
- Court of appeal
- news
Share Reuse this content
Most viewed
Most viewed
- 10.
Named provisions
Related changes
Get daily alerts for Inner Temple Library Current Awareness
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from The Guardian.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Inner Temple Library Current Awareness publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.