Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Sentencing Act 2026 and Interplay with Sentenci...

Priority review Notice Added Final

Sentencing Act 2026 and Interplay with Sentencing Guidelines and Bail Act 1976

Detected April 1st, 2026

Summary

St Philips Barristers has published an analysis of the Sentencing Act 2026 and its interaction with existing sentencing guidelines and the Bail Act 1976. The article examines how the new sentencing provisions operate alongside established guidelines frameworks and bail considerations for criminal proceedings.

View original document View source feed page

What changed

The Sentencing Act 2026 introduces new provisions that interact with existing sentencing guidelines issued by the Sentencing Council and modifies aspects of bail law under the Bail Act 1976. The analysis addresses how courts should apply these new provisions in criminal sentencing cases, particularly regarding the interplay between statutory sentencing requirements and judicial guideline considerations.

Criminal law practitioners and courts should review this guidance to understand how the 2026 Act changes sentencing procedures and bail determinations. Legal professionals should ensure their case preparation accounts for any new requirements or modified considerations introduced by the legislation. Defendants and their representatives should be aware of how bail applications may be affected by these changes.

What to do next

Review Sentencing Act 2026 provisions and assess impact on current case strategies
Update bail application arguments to reflect any amendments to Bail Act 1976 considerations
Familiarise with how new sentencing guidelines interact with existing statutory framework

Source document (simplified)

- Expertise

Expertise

We recognise that clients demand specialist knowledge from barristers who are technically astute, excellent in court and aware of wider commercial issues and personable.

Barristers
Clerks
Administration
- News
- About Us #### About Us
Instructing a Barrister
Our History
Community Outreach
Our Birmingham Location
Our Leeds Location
Regulatory Information
E-Shot Signup
- Join Us #### Join Us
Tenancy
Probationary Tenancy
Pupillage
Mini Pupillage
Staff Vacancies
All Vacancies
- Shortlist
- +44 (0) 121 246 7000
- Contact Search
- Expertise Expertise
Business & Property
Crime
Employment
Family
Mediation & Arbitration
Personal Injury & Clinical Negligence
Regulatory
Direct Access to a Barrister
- People People We recognise that clients demand specialist knowledge from barristers who are technically astute, excellent in court and aware of wider commercial issues and personable.
Barristers
Clerks
Administration
- News
- About Us About Us
Instructing a Barrister
Our History
Community Outreach
Our Birmingham Location
Our Leeds Location
Regulatory Information
E-Shot Signup
- Join Join
Tenancy
Probationary Tenancy
Pupillage
Mini Pupillage
Staff Vacancies
All Vacancies
- Shortlist
- Contact News # The Sentencing Act 2026 and its interplay with the Sentencing guidelines and the Bail Act 1976

31/03/2026

The Sentencing Act 2026 and its interplay with the Sentencing guidelines and the Bail Act 1976
Jonathan Barker, leading Matthew Cullen, prosecuted Harminder Mattu for Murder
Tom Walkling KC, leading Carl Templar-Vasey, client acquitted of murder and manslaughter charges
Silks Day: Ben Williams and Ben Close Sworn in as Silk
Richard Atkins KC leading Matthew Cullen uphold conviction in the Court of Appeal Written by: Maria-Angeliki Lazari – Pupil

Share The Sentencing Act 2026 (“the Act”) came into effect on 22 March 2026. This has led to significant amendments to the sentencing guidelines and The Bail Act 1976 (“the Bail Act”) that criminal practitioners should be aware of when advising and representing clients.

Sentencing guidelines

Purposes of sentencing

Prior to the amendments, one of the five purposes of sentencing was the protection of the public. This now expressly includes the victims of crime.

Presumption to suspend short custodial sentences

Where an offender was convicted before 22 March 2026, if the shortest term commensurate with the seriousness of the offence is 2 years or less, the court should consider whether it is appropriate to suspend that sentence. The court should weigh the relevant factors in the sentencing guidelines to decide whether it is possible to suspend the sentence.

However, the Act introduced a presumption that custodial sentences of 12 months or less must be suspended. The presumption is applicable to offenders convicted on or after 22 March 2026, unless any of the following exceptions apply:

The offender is in custody (either serving a sentence, on remand for another offence, or detained under a hospital order)
The offender is being resentenced for breaching a community or suspended sentence order
The offence was committed while the offender was subject to a community or suspended sentence order
The commission of the offence, or an associated offence, was a breach of a court order or was closely connected with a breach of a court order (whether or not that breach constituted a criminal offence)
There is significant risk of physical or psychological harm to an individual
Exceptional circumstances relate to the offence or the offender which justify not suspending the sentence. If the sentence is not to be suspended under the presumption or if the shortest term commensurate with the seriousness of the offending is more than 12 months and no more than 3 years, the court should consider whether it is appropriate to suspend the sentence so that it is served in the community under the supervision of the Probation Service.

Increase in the period for which sentencing can be deferred

A deferment order is available to a magistrates’ or the Crown Court. For offenders convicted of any of the offences before 22 March 2026, the court can delay the passing of a sentence for up to 6 months.

The Act increased the period for which sentencing can be deferred to up to 12 months for offenders convicted of all the offences on or after 22 March 2026.

Bail Act

Bail test

The presumption to suspend short custodial sentences outlined above means that immediate imprisonment will be less likely in cases where the presumption applies. Thus, the courts are expected to be able to predict more accurately whether an offender will be subject to immediate custody when deciding the outcome of a bail application.

Where an immediate custodial sentence appears unlikely, there is less justification for remanding a defendant. The ‘no real prospect’ test has therefore been amended to a ‘no real prospect of immediate custody’ test with fewer exceptions to bail applying.

The ‘no real prospect of immediate custody’ test will be applicable when the court considers:

that there is no real prospect that the defendant will be sentenced to an immediate custodial sentence, and
to defendants who have been convicted but are awaiting sentence. Electronic monitoring

Prior to the amendments, the Bail Act only allowed electronic monitoring if the court was satisfied that without it the defendant would not be granted bail. However, the test to decide eligibility for electronic monitoring has now been amended, and it is not necessary for electronic monitoring to be an alternative to a remand.

Subject to the statutory conditions being met (see below), an electronic monitoring requirement will be available where the court finds that there is a real prospect of a suspended sentence and no real prospect of an immediate custodial sentence.

Statutory factors

Before the amendments, paragraph 9 of Schedule 1, Part 1 of the Bail Act set out the following factors that the court should consider when deciding whether to grant bail or remand:

the nature and seriousness of the offence or default
the character, antecedents, associations and community ties of the defendant
any other factors which appear to be relevant.
The Act has now added the following factors to paragraph 9 of the Bail Act as potentially relevant factors:
the defendant is pregnant,
the defendant is the primary carer of another person, or
the defendant has been the victim of domestic abuse.
The court could take these factors into account before the amendments. However, the fact that they have been included in the Bail Act will ensure that the court will consider them when deciding whether to grant or refuse bail.

Commentary

The combined effect of the Sentencing Act and the amendments to the sentencing guidelines and the Bail Act is that fewer offenders will be remanded pre-trial and imprisoned post-conviction. There will be greater reliance on conditional release systems and probation enforcement.

Further, the Act reinforces the Bail Act’s presumption in favour of bail by reducing the likelihood of imposition of short custodial sentences, hence weakening traditional justifications for remand while increasing the role of conditional, community-based supervision by the Probation Office both before and after conviction. Only the future will tell whether these implementations will achieve their goal and lead to a reduction in the numbers of prisoners.

Maria-Angeliki is accepting instructions from 1 April 2026, if you would like to discuss how she can assist, please contact her clerks at **crime@st-philips.com**

Useful links:

https://sentencingcouncil.org.uk/updates/amendments-to-be-made-to-sentencing-guidelines-on-20-March-as-a-result-of-the-sentencing-act-2026

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/bail-act-1976-amendments/circular-no-2026-01-bail-act-1976-amendments-to-the-bail-framework-by-the-sentencing-act-2026

Bail Act 1976 – https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1976/63

Sentencing Act 2026 – https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2026/2/section/2/2026-01-22

This article reflects the law as of the date it was published. Whilst every effort has been taken to ensure that the law in this article is correct, it is intended to give a general overview of the law for educational and/or informational purposes. It is not intended to be a substitute for specific legal advice and should not be relied upon for this purpose.

This article represents the opinion of the author and does not necessarily reflect the view of any other member of St Philips Chambers.

Written by Maria-Angeliki Lazari – Pupil

Today, two members of our Crime and Regulatory Groups, Ben Williams and Ben Close, were sworn in as King’s Counsel at a ceremony held in Westminster Hall before the Lord Chancellor. All members and staff at Chambers extend their congratulations... Back to Crime See All

St Philips Barristers are regulated by the Bar Standards Board.

Birmingham

55 Temple Row
Birmingham
B2 5LS
0121 246 7000

Leeds

29 Park Square
Leeds
LS1 2PQ

Menu
- Clerks
- Administration
- Contact Us
- Complaints
- Privacy Policy

Bespoke web design made in London by Yellowball.

Cookies

We use cookies to give you the best possible experience. We can also use them to analyse the behaviour of users in order to continuously improve the website for you.

View our Privacy Policy for further information.

Reject Accept Customise my options