Changeflow GovPing Courts & Legal Pugh v. Pugh, 4D2025-1603 — Affirmed
Routine Enforcement Amended Final

Pugh v. Pugh, 4D2025-1603 — Affirmed

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com FL District Court of Appeal Opinions
Filed
Detected
Email

Summary

The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, affirmed the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County, in a domestic relations case. The appellate panel consisting of Gross, Ciklin, and Shepherd JJ. issued a per curiam affirmance with no written opinion explaining the basis for the decision. The underlying case originated in Martin County under Case No. 432024DR000315AXMX, with appellant Maschelle Adrianne Pugh appearing pro se. The ruling is not final until disposition of a timely-filed motion for rehearing.

“Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.”

Published by FL District on courtlistener.com . Detected, standardized, and enriched by GovPing. Review our methodology and editorial standards .

About this source

Florida's District Courts of Appeal sit between the trial courts and the Florida Supreme Court. Six districts cover the state, hearing appeals on civil judgments, criminal convictions, family law orders, and administrative decisions. This feed tracks every published opinion across all six districts, around 125 a month, with the case name, appellant, type of relief sought, and outcome. Watch this if you practice civil litigation in Florida, defend insurance disputes (the carriers fight a lot of appeals here), or follow Florida's busy criminal post-conviction docket. GovPing pulls from CourtListener's official mirror of the courts' RSS feeds.

What changed

The appellate court affirmed the lower circuit court order in this domestic relations appeal with a per curiam disposition. No substantive legal analysis or reasoning was provided in the appellate opinion, as the court summarily affirmed without elaboration. Gross, Ciklin, and Shepherd JJ. constituted the panel for the decision.

Affected parties in similar domestic relations appeals should note that per curiam affirmances provide no precedential guidance on the merits of the underlying dispute. Pro se litigants, such as appellant Maschelle Adrianne Pugh in this case, face the same appellate standards as represented parties. Any party seeking reconsideration must file a timely motion for rehearing before the decision becomes final.

Archived snapshot

Apr 23, 2026

GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.

Jump To

Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

April 23, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Maschelle Adrianne Pugh W v. Eric P. Pugh

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Disposition

Affirmed

Combined Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

MASCHELLE ADRIANNE PUGH,
Appellant,

v.

ERIC P. PUGH,
Appellee.

No. 4D2025-1603

[April 23, 2026]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth
Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case
No. 432024DR000315AXMX.

Maschelle Adrianne Pugh, Jupiter, pro se.

Scott D. Glassman of Law Office of Scott Glassman, P.A., West Palm
Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CIKLIN and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.


Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Get daily alerts for FL District Court of Appeal Opinions

Daily digest delivered to your inbox.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

About this page

What is GovPing?

Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission

What's from the agency?

Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from FL District.

What's AI-generated?

The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.

Last updated

Classification

Agency
FL District
Filed
April 23rd, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Branch
Judicial
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor
Docket
4D2025-1603

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals Courts
Industry sector
5411 Legal Services
Activity scope
Appellate review Family court proceedings
Geographic scope
Florida US-FL

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Civil Rights Family Law

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

You're subscribed!