Jamal T. Jackson v. State of Florida Criminal Appeal Affirmed
Summary
The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed Jamal T. Jackson's criminal appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County. The per curiam decision, citing no specific legal reasoning, affirmed the lower court judgment. The appeal was brought pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2).
What changed
The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal issued a per curiam affirmance in Jamal T. Jackson v. State of Florida, a criminal appeal from Orange County Circuit Court. The court provided no substantive legal analysis or written opinion, simply affirming the lower court's judgment. Three judges (TravER, STARGEL, and GANNAM) concurred in the decision.
This routine affirmance does not establish any legal precedent or create compliance obligations for any regulated entity. It represents a procedural disposition of an individual criminal matter with no broader regulatory implications.
Archived snapshot
Apr 21, 2026GovPing captured this document from the original source. If the source has since changed or been removed, this is the text as it existed at that time.
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
April 21, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Jamal T. Jackson v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 6D2025-2035
Disposition: Affirmed
Disposition
Affirmed
Combined Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 6D2025-2035
Lower Tribunal No. 2012-CF-008312-D-O
JAMAL T. JACKSON,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Orange County.
Barbara J. Leach, Judge.
April 21, 2026
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
TRAVER, C.J., and STARGEL and GANNAM, JJ., concur.
Jamal T. Jackson, Wewahitchka, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Roberts J. Bradford, Jr.,
Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Parties
Related changes
Get daily alerts for FL District Court of Appeal Opinions
Daily digest delivered to your inbox.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Source
About this page
Every important government, regulator, and court update from around the world. One place. Real-time. Free. Our mission
Source document text, dates, docket IDs, and authority are extracted directly from FL District.
The summary, classification, recommended actions, deadlines, and penalty information are AI-generated from the original text and may contain errors. Always verify against the source document.
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.
Subscribed!
Optional. Filters your digest to exactly the updates that matter to you.